Advertisement

Risk Analysis of Subsea Blowout Preventer by Mapping GO Models into Bayesian Networks

  • Baoping CaiEmail author
  • Yonghong Liu
  • Zengkai Liu
  • Yuanjiang Chang
  • Lei Jiang
Chapter

Abstract

Bayesian network (BN) is commonly used in probabilistic risk quantification due to its powerful capacity in uncertain knowledge representation and uncertainty reasoning. For the formalization of BN models, this paper presents a novel approach on constructing a BN from GO model. The equivalent BNs of the seventeen basic operators in GO methodology are developed. Therefore, the existing GO model can be mapped into an equivalent BN on basis of these developed BNs of the operators. Subsea blowout preventer (BOP) system plays an important role in providing safety during the subsea drilling activities. A case of closing the subsea BOP in the presence of pump failures is used to illustrate the mapping process. First, its GO model is presented according to the flowchart of the case. Then, BN is obtained based on the presented GO model. The developed BN relaxes the limitations of GO model and is capable of probability updating and probability adapting. Sensitivity analysis is performed to find the key influencing factor. The three-axiom-based analysis method is used to validate the developed BN.

Keywords

Risk analysis Subsea blowout preventer GO methodology Bayesian network 

References

  1. 1.
    L. Sanmiquel, J.M. Rossell, C. Vintro, Study of Spanish mining accidents using data mining techniques. Saf. Sci. 75, 49–55 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Khakzad, F. Khan, P. Amyotte, Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96, 925–932 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.S. Wu, R. Zhou, S.D. Xu, Z.W. Wu, Probabilistic analysis of natural gas pipeline network accident based on Bayesian network. J. Loss Prevent Proc. Ind. 46, 126–136 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y.M. Huang, G.W. Ma, J.D. Li, Grid-based risk mapping for gas explosion accidents by using Bayesian network method. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. Ind. 48, 223–232 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.T. Yeo, J. Bhandari, R. Abbassi, V. Garaniya, S.H. Chai, B. Shomali, Dynamic risk analysis of offloading process in floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) platform using Bayesian Network. J. Loss Prevent Proc. Ind. 41, 259–269 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Goerlandt, J. Montewka, A framework for risk analysis of maritime transportation systems: a case for oil spill from tankers in a ship-ship collision. Saf. Sci. 76, 42–66 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Garmer, H. Sjostrom, A.M. Hiremath, A.K. Tilwankar, G. Kinigalakis, S.R. Asolekar, Development and validation of three-step risk assessment method for ship recycling sector. Saf. Sci. 76, 175–189 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Bhandari, R. Abbassi, V. Garaniya, F. Khan, Risk analysis of deepwater drilling operations using Bayesian network. J. Loss Prevent Proc. Ind. 38, 11–23 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Khakzad, F. Khan, P. Amyotte, Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: a Bayesian approach. Saf. Sci. 57, 108–117 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.J. Akhtar, I.B. Utne, Human fatigue’s effect on the risk of maritime groundings—A Bayesian network modeling approach. Saf. Sci. 62, 427–440 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Musharraf, D. Bradbury-Squires, F. Khan, B. Veitch, S. Mackinnon, S. Imtiaz, A virtual experimental technique for data collection for a Bayesian network approach to human reliability analysis. Reliab. Eng. Sys. Saf. 132, 1–8 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Musharraf, J. Hassan, F. Khan, B. Beitch, S. MacKinnon, S. Imtiza, Human reliability assessment during offshore emergency conditions. Saf. Sci. 2013, 19–27 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Abimbola, F. Khan, N. Khakzad, S. Butt, Safety and risk analysis of managed pressure drilling operation using Bayesian network. Saf. Sci. 76, 133–144 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Cai, H. Liu, M. Xie, A real-time fault diagnosis methodology of complex systems using object-oriented Bayesian networks. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 80, 31–44 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. Cai, M. Xie, Y. Liu, Y. Liu, Q. Feng, Availability-based engineering resilience metric and its corresponding evaluation methodology. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 172, 216–224 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y. Zhao, F. Xiao, S. Wang, An intelligent chiller fault detection and diagnosis methodology using Bayesian belief network. Energy Build. 57, 278–288 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. Cai, L. Huang, M. Xie, Bayesian networks in fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform. 13, 2227–2240 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Bobbio, L. Portinale, M. Minichino, E. Ciancamerla, Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Sys. Saf. 71, 249–260 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Boudali, J.B. Dugan, A discrete-time Bayesian network reliability modeling and analysis framework. Reliab. Eng. Sys. Saf. 87, 337–349 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Montani, L. Portinale, A. Bobbio, Codetta-Raiteri D. RADYBAN: a tool for reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees through conversion into dynamic Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Sys. Saf. 93, 922–932 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. Bearfield, W. Marsh, Generalising event trees using Bayesian networks with a case study of train derailment. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 3688, 52–66 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C.H. Lo, Y.K. Wong, A.B. Rad, Bond graph based Bayesian network for fault diagnosis. Appl. Soft Comput. 11, 1208–1212 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M.C. Kim, Reliability block diagram with general gates and its application to system reliability analysis. Ann. Nucl. Energy 38, 2456–2461 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    N. Khakzad, F. Khan, P. Amyotte, Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 91, 46–53 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    R.L. Williams, W.Y. Gateley, Use of GO methodology to directly generate minimal cut set, in Nuclear system reliability engineering and risk assessment, ed. by I.B. Fussell (Society for industrial and applied mathematics, Pennsylvania, PA, 1977), pp. 825–849Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    T. Matsuoka, M. Kobayashi, GO-FLOW: a new reliability analysis methodology. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 98, 64–78 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    X.J. Yi, J. Shi, H.N. Mu, H.P. Dong, Z. Zhang, Reliability analysis of repairable system with multiple-input and multi-function component based on goal-oriented methodology. ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B 3, 014501–014501–014501–014506 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    X.J. Yi, B.S. Dhillon, J. Shi, H.N. Mu, Z. Zhang, A new reliability analysis method for vehicle systems based on goal-oriented methodology. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. D 231, 1066–1095 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Z.P. Shen, X.J. Dai, X.R. Huang, A supplemental algorithm for the repairable system in the GO methodology. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91, 940–944 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Z. Shen, J. Gao, X. Huang, A new quantification algorithm for the GO methodology. Reliab. Eng. Sys. Saf. 67, 241–247 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Z.P. Shen, X.R. Huang, Principle and application of GO methodology: a system reliability analysis methodology (Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, 2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    M. Abimbola, F. Khan, N. Khakzad, Dynamic safety risk analysis of offshore drilling. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 30, 74–85 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    R. Islam, F. Khan, R. Venkatesan, Real time risk analysis of kick detection: testing and validation. Reliab. Eng. Sys. Saf. 161, 25–37 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    P. Fougere, J.R. Roche, Multiplex BOP system utilizes updated technology, decreases riser disconnect time. Oil Gas J. 98, 86–94 (1997)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    B. Jones, J. Jenkinson, Z. Yang, J. Wang, The use of Bayesian network modelling for maintenance planning in a manufacturing industry. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95, 267–277 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Baoping Cai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yonghong Liu
    • 1
  • Zengkai Liu
    • 1
  • Yuanjiang Chang
    • 1
  • Lei Jiang
    • 2
  1. 1.China University of PetroleumQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Southwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations