Application of Bayesian Networks in Reliability Evaluation

  • Baoping CaiEmail author
  • Yonghong Liu
  • Zengkai Liu
  • Yuanjiang Chang
  • Lei Jiang


The Bayesian network (BN) is a powerful model for probabilistic knowledge representation and inference and is increasingly used in the field of reliability evaluation. This paper presents a bibliographic review of BNs that have been proposed for reliability evaluation in the last decades. Studies are classified from the perspective of the objects of reliability evaluation, i.e., hardware, structures, software, and humans. For each classification, the construction and validation of a BN-based reliability model are emphasized. The general procedural steps for BN-based reliability evaluation, including BN structure modeling, BN parameter modeling, BN inference, and model verification and validation, are investigated. Current gaps and challenges in reliability evaluation with BNs are explored, and a few upcoming research directions that are of interest to reliability researchers are identified.


Bayesian network (BN) Reliability Hardware Structure Software Human 


  1. 1.
    A. Bobbio, L. Portinale, M. Minichino, E. Ciancamerla, Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 71(3), 249–260, (2001). (2001-01-01)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    IEC, Electric/Electronic/Programmable Electronic safety-related systems, parts 1–7. Technical Report, International Electrotechnical Commission (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Cai, L. Huang, M. Xie, Bayesian networks in fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 13(5), 2227–2240 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.A. Khorshidi, I. Gunawan, M.Y. Ibrahim, Data-Driven system reliability and failure behavior modeling using FMECA. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 12(3), 1253–1260 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Q. Zhang, C. Zhou, Y. Tian, N. Xiong, Y. Qin, B. Hu, A fuzzy probability Bayesian network approach for dynamic cybersecurity risk assessment in industrial control systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. (2018), Scholar
  6. 6.
    Z. Liu, Y. Liu, X.L. Wu, B. Cai, Risk analysis of subsea blowout preventer by mapping GO models into Bayesian networks. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 52, 54–65 (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Cai, Y. Liu, Q. Fan, A multiphase dynamic Bayesian networks methodology for the determination of safety integrity levels. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 150, 105–115 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Cai, M. Xie, Y. Liu, Y. Liu, Q. Feng, Availability-based engineering resilience metric and its corresponding evaluation methodology. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 172, 216–224 (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Cai, Y. Liu, M. Xie, A dynamic-bayesian-network-based fault diagnosis methodology considering transient and intermittent faults. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 1(14), 276–285 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Luo, L. Kaicheng, Y. Li, D. Cai, C. Zhao, Q. Meng, Three layer Bayesian network for classification of complex power quality disturbances. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. (2018), Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. Wang, Z. Wang, X. Gu, S. He, Z. Yan, Feature selection based on Bayesian network for chiller fault diagnosis from the perspective of field applications. Appl. Therm. Eng. 129, 674–683 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Langseth, L. Portinale, Bayesian networks in reliability. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92(1), 92–108 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Tosun, A.B. Bener, S. Akbarinasaji, A systematic literature review on the applications of Bayesian networks to predict software quality. Softw. Qual. J. 25(1), 273–305 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Mkrtchyan, L. Podofillini, V.N. Dang, Bayesian belief networks for human reliability analysis: A review of applications and gaps. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 139, 1–16 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Mkrtchyan, L. Podofillini, V.N. Dang, Methods for building conditional probability tables of Bayesian belief networks from limited judgment: An evaluation for human reliability application. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 151, 93–112 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    F.V. Jensen, T.D. Nielsen, Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs (Springer Science and Business Media, 2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    U.B. Kjærulff, A.L. Madsen, Bayesian Networks and Influence Diagrams: A Guide to Construction and Analysis (Springer Science and Business Media, 2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Darwiche, Modeling and Reasoning with Bayesian Networks (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    X. Yuan, B. Cai, Y. Ma, J. Zhang, K. Mulenga, Y. Liu, G. Chen, Reliability evaluation methodology of complex systems based on dynamic object-oriented Bayesian networks. IEEE Access 6, 11289–11300 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. Weber, L. Jouffe, Complex system reliability modelling with dynamic object oriented Bayesian networks (DOOBN). Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91(2), 149–162 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Sättele, M. Bründl, D. Straub, Reliability and effectiveness of early warning systems for natural hazards: Concept and application to debris flow warning. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 142, 192–202 (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. Honari, J. Donovan, E. Murphy, Using Bayesian networks in reliability evaluation for an (r, s)-out-of-(m, n): F distributed communication system. J. Stat. Plann. Infer. 139(5), 1756–1765 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Eliassi, A.K. Dashtaki, H. Seifi, M. Haghifam, C. Singh, Application of Bayesian networks in composite power system reliability assessment and reliability-based analysis. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 9(13), 1755–1764 (2015). (2015-10-01)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    H. Seifi, M. Eliassi,M. Haghifam, Incorporation of protection system failures into bulk power system reliability assessment by Bayesian networks. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 9(11), 1226–1234 (2015). (2015-08-06)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    B. Cai, Y. Liu, Z. Liu, X. Tian, X. Dong, S. Yu, Using Bayesian networks in reliability evaluation for subsea blowout preventer control system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 108, 32–41 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    B. Cai, Y. Liu, Q. Fan, Y. Zhang, S. Yu, Z. Liu, X. Dong, Performance evaluation of subsea BOP control systems using dynamic Bayesian networks with imperfect repair and preventive maintenance. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 26(10), 2661–2672 (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    B. Cai, Y. Liu, Y. Ma, Z. Liu, Y. Zhou, J. Sun, Real-time reliability evaluation methodology based on dynamic Bayesian networks: A case study of a subsea pipe ram BOP system. ISA Trans. 58, 595–604 (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Q. Feng, X. Bi, X. Zhao, Y. Chen, B. Sun, Heuristic hybrid game approach for fleet condition-based maintenance planning. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 157, 166–176 (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Q. Feng, W. Bi, Y. Chen, Y. Ren, D. Yang, Cooperative game approach based on agent learning for fleet maintenance oriented to mission reliability. Comput. Ind. Eng. 112, 221–230 (2017)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    T. Huang, J. Yan, M. Jiang, W. Peng, H. Huang, Reliability analysis of electrical system of computer numerical control machine tool based on bayesian networks. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Science) 21(5), 635–640 (2016)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    J. Mi, Y. Li, Y. Yang, W. Peng, H. Huang, Reliability assessment of complex electromechanical systems under epistemic uncertainty. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 152, 1–15 (2016)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    S. Montani, L. Portinale, A. Bobbio, D. Codetta-Raiteri, Radyban: A tool for reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees through conversion into dynamic Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93(7), 922–932 (2008)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    L. Portinale, D.C. Raiteri, S. Montani, Supporting reliability engineers in exploiting the power of dynamic Bayesian networks. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 51(2), 179–195 (2010)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    H. Boudali, J.B. Dugan, A discrete-time Bayesian network reliability modeling and analysis framework. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 87(3), 337–349 (2005)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    X.F. Liang, H.D. Wang, H. Yi, D. Li, Warship reliability evaluation based on dynamic bayesian networks and numerical simulation. Ocean Eng. 136, 129–140 (2017)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    B. Cai, Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, Q. Fan, S. Yu, Dynamic Bayesian networks based performance evaluation of subsea blowout preventers in presence of imperfect repair. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(18), 7544–7554 (2013)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Z. Liu, Y. Liu, X. Wu, D. Yang, B. Cai, C. Zheng, Reliability evaluation of auxiliary feedwater system by mapping GO-FLOW models into Bayesian networks. ISA Trans. 64, 174–183 (2016)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    T. Daemi, A. Ebrahimi, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Constructing the Bayesian network for components reliability importance ranking in composite power systems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 43(1), 474–480 (2012)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    O. Doguc, J.E. Ramirez-Marquez, A generic method for estimating system reliability using Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(2), 542–550 (2009)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    O. Doguc, J.E. Ramirez-Marquez, An automated method for estimating reliability of grid systems using Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 104, 96–105 (2012)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    P. Yontay, R. Pan, A computational Bayesian approach to dependency assessment in system reliability. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 152, 104–114 (2016)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Y. Zhang, L. Wang, Y. Xiang, C. Ten, Power system reliability evaluation with SCADA cybersecurity considerations. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6(4), 1707–1721 (2015)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Z. Ruijun, Z. Lulu, W. Nannan, W. Xiaowei, Reliability evaluation of a multi-state system based on interval-valued triangular fuzzy Bayesian networks. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 7(1), 16–24 (2016)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Y. Liu, C. Singh, Evaluation of hurricane impact on composite power system reliability considering common-cause failures. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 1(2), 135–145 (2010)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    I. Tien, A. Der Kiureghian, Algorithms for Bayesian network modeling and reliability assessment of infrastructure systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 156, 134–147 (2016)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Y. Tong, I. Tien, Algorithms for Bayesian network modeling, inference, and reliability assessment for multistate flow networks. J. Comput. Civil Eng. 5(31), 04017051 (2017)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    D. Marquez, M. Neil, N. Fenton, Improved reliability modeling using Bayesian networks and dynamic discretization. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95(4), 412–425 (2010)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    X. Zhong, M. Ichchou, A. Saidi, Reliability assessment of complex mechatronic systems using a modified nonparametric belief propagation algorithm. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95(11), 1174–1185 (2010)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    B. Cai, Y. Liu, Y. Ma, L. Huang, Z. Liu, A framework for the reliability evaluation of grid-connected photovoltaic systems in the presence of intermittent faults. Energy 93, 1308–1320 (2015)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    A.O. Connor, A. Mosleh, A general cause based methodology for analysis of common cause and dependent failures in system risk and reliability assessments. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 145, 341–350 (2016)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    C. Simon, P. Weber, A. Evsukoff, Bayesian networks inference algorithm to implement Dempster Shafer theory in reliability analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93(7), 950–963 (2008)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    M. Groden, M. Collette, Fusing fleet in-service measurements using Bayesian networks. Mar. Struct. 54, 38–49 (2017)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    J. Hackl, J. Kohler, Reliability assessment of deteriorating reinforced concrete structures by representing the coupled effect of corrosion initiation and progression by Bayesian networks. Struct. Saf. 62, 12–23 (2016)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    E.H. Ait Mokhtar, A. Chateauneuf, R. Laggoune, Bayesian approach for the reliability assessment of corroded interdependent pipe networks. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 148, 46–58 (2016)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    D. Lee, J.D. Achenbach, Analysis of the reliability of a jet engine compressor rotor blade containing a fatigue crack. J. Appl. Mech. 4(83), 041004 (2016)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    D. Lee, Y. Huang, J.D. Achenbach, Probabilistic analysis of stress corrosion crack growth and related structural reliability considerations. J. Appl. Mech. 2(83), 021003 (2016)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    D. Straub, Stochastic modeling of deterioration processes through dynamic Bayesian networks. J. Eng. Mech. 10(135), 1089–1099 (2009)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    S. Mahadevan, R. Zhang, N. Smith, Bayesian networks for system reliability reassessment. Struct. Saf. 23(3), 231–251 (2001). (2001-01-01)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    D. Straub, A.D. Kiureghian, Bayesian Network enhanced with structural reliability methods: Methodology. J. Eng. Mech. 10(136), 1248–1258 (2009)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    J. Luque, D. Straub, Reliability analysis and updating of deteriorating systems with dynamic Bayesian networks. Struct. Saf. 62, 34–46 (2016)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    D. Straub, A.D. Kiureghian, Bayesian network enhanced with structural reliability methods: Application. J. Eng. Mech. 10(136), 1259–1270 (2010)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    K. Zwirglmaier, D. Straub, A discretization procedure for rare events in Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 153, 96–109 (2016)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    J. Zhu, M. Collette, A dynamic discretization method for reliability inference in dynamic Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 138, 242–252 (2015)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    N. Fenton, B. Littlewood, M. Neil, L. Strigini, A. Sutcliffe, D. Wright, Assessing dependability of safety critical systems using diverse evidence. IEE Proc.-Softw. 1(145), 34–46 (1998)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    N.E. Fenton, M. Neil, A critique of software defect prediction models. EEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 5(25), 675–689 (1999)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    N. Fenton, M. Neil, D. Marquez, Using Bayesian networks to predict software defects and reliability. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 222(4), 701–712 (2008)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    M. Neil, N. Fenton, L. Nielson, Building large-scale Bayesian networks. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 3(15), 257–284 (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    G. Dahll, B.A. Gran, The use of Bayesian belief nets in safety assessment of software based systems. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 2(29), 205–229 (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    B.A. Gran, Use of Bayesian belief networks when combining disparate sources of information in the safety assessment of software-based systems. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 6(33), 529–542 (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    G. Dahll, Combining disparate sources of information in the safety assessment of software-based systems. Nucl. Eng. Des. 6(33), 529–542 (2000)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    S. Mohanta, G. Vinod, R. Mall, A technique for early prediction of software reliability based on design metrics. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 2(4), 261–281 (2011)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    G. Si, J. Xu, J. Yang, S. Wen, An evaluation model for dependability of Internet-scale software on basis of Bayesian networks and trustworthiness. J. Syst. Softw. 89, 63–75 (2014)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    B. Zou, M. Yang, E. Benjamin, H. Yoshikawa, Reliability analysis of digital instrumentation and control software system. Prog. Nucl. Energy 98, 85–93 (2017)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    R. Roshandel, N. Medvidovic, L. Golubchik, A Bayesian model for predicting reliability of software systems at the architectural level. QoSA 2007 LNCS 4880, 108–126 (2007)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Y. Jiang, H. Zhang, X. Song, X. Jiao, W.N.N. Hung, M. Gu, J. Sun, Bayesian-network-based reliability analysis of PLC systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 60(11), 5325–5336 (2013)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    B.A. Gran, A. Helminen, A Bayesian belief network for reliability assessment. SAFECOMP 2001 LNCS 2187, 35–45 (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    C.G. Bai, Q.P. Hu, M. Xie, S.H. Ng, Software failure prediction based on a Markov Bayesian network model. J. Syst. Softw. 74(3), 275–282 (2005)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Y. Liu, B. Cai, R. Ji, Z. Liu, Y. Zhang, Reliability Modeling and Evaluation of Subsea Blowout Preventer Systems (Science Press, 2015)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    C. Bai, Bayesian network based software reliability prediction with an operational profile. J. Syst. Softw. 77(2), 103–112 (2005)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    J.A. McCall, W. Randell, J. Dunham, L. Lauterbach, Software reliability, measurement, and testing software reliability and test integration. Tech. Rep. Final Technical Report RL-TR-92-52 (Rome Laboratory, Rome) (1992)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Q. Zhou, Y.D. Wong, H.S. Loh, K.F. Yuen, A fuzzy and Bayesian network CREAM model for human reliability analysis—The case of tanker shipping. Saf. Sci. 105, 149–157 (2018)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    P. Li, G. Chen, L. Dai, L. Zhang, A fuzzy Bayesian network approach to improve the quantification of organizational influences in HRA frameworks. Saf. Sci. 50(7), 1569–1583 (2012)Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    M. Aalipour, Y.Z. Ayele, A. Barabadi, Human reliability assessment (HRA) in maintenance of production process: A case study. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 7(2), 229–238 (2016)Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    K. Zwirglmaier, D. Straub, K.M. Groth, Capturing cognitive causal paths in human reliability analysis with Bayesian network models. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 158, 117–129 (2017)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    K.M. Groth, L.P. Swiler, Bridging the gap between HRA research and HRA practice: A Bayesian network version of SPAR-H. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 115, 33–42 (2013)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    R. Sundaramurthi, C. Smidts, Human reliability modeling for the next generation system code. Ann. Nucl. Energy 52, 137–156 (2013)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    B. Cai, Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, Q. Fan, Z. Liu, X. Tian, A dynamic Bayesian networks modeling of human factors on offshore blowouts. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26(4), 639–649 (2013)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    M.R. Martins, M.C. Maturana, Application of Bayesian belief networks to the human reliability analysis of an oil tanker operation focusing on collision accidents. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 110, 89–109 (2013)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    P. Baraldi, L. Podofillini, L. Mkrtchyan, E. Zio, V.N. Dang, Comparing the treatment of uncertainty in Bayesian networks and fuzzy expert systems used for a human reliability analysis application. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 138, 176–193 (2015)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    M. Musharraf, D. Bradbury-Squires, F. Khan, B. Veitch, S. MacKinnon, S. Imtiaz, A virtual experimental technique for data collection for a Bayesian network approach to human reliability analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 132, 1–8 (2014)Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    P. Li, L. Zhang, L. Dai, X. Li, Study on operator’s SA reliability in digital NPPs. Part 3: A quantitative assessment method. Ann. Nucl. Energy 109, 82–91 (2017)Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    M.C. Kim, P.H. Seong, An analytic model for situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators based on Bayesian inference. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91(3), 270–282 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    H. Lee, P. Seong, A computational model for evaluating the effects of attention, memory, and mental models on situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(11), 1796–1805 (2009)Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Z.L. Yang, S. Bonsall, A. Wall, J. Wang, M. Usman, A modified CREAM to human reliability quantification in marine engineering. Ocean Eng. 58, 293–303 (2013)Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    M. Musharraf, J. Hassan, F. Khan, B. Veitch, S. MacKinnon, S. Imtiaz, Human reliability assessment during offshore emergency conditions. Saf. Sci. 59, 19–27 (2013)Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    B. Kirwan, Validation of human reliability assessment techniques: Part 1—Validation issues. Saf. Sci. 27(6), 359–73 (1996). (1996-12-01)Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    B. Kirwan, Validation of human reliability assessment techniques: Part 2—Validation results. Saf. Sci. 1(27), 43–75 (1997)Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    A. Gregoriades, A. Sutcliffe, Workload prediction for improved design and reliability of complex systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93(4), 530–549 (2008)Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    D.J. Bradbury-Squires, Simulation Training in a Virtual Environment of an Offshore Oil Installation (2013)Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    A.X. Miao, G.L. Zacharias, S. Kao, A Computational situation assessment model for nuclear power plant operations. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern.-Part A: Systems and humans 6(27), 728–742 (1997)Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Z. Liu, Y. Liu, B. Cai, D. Zhang, C. Zheng, Dynamic Bayesian network modeling of reliability of subsea blowout preventer stack in presence of common cause failures. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 38, 58–66 (2015)Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    M. Li, J. Liu, J. Li, B.U. Kim, Bayesian modeling of multi-state hierarchical systems with multi-level information aggregation. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 124, 158–164 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Baoping Cai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yonghong Liu
    • 1
  • Zengkai Liu
    • 1
  • Yuanjiang Chang
    • 1
  • Lei Jiang
    • 2
  1. 1.China University of PetroleumQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Southwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations