Skip to main content

What Kind of Future in What Kind of World?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Civic and Citizenship Education in Volatile Times

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((SCEC))

  • 504 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews current trends influencing societies and individuals and assesses the implications for CCE. Following from the previous chapter, it is acknowledged that CCE can support both the authoritarian state and the democratic state but in relation to the latter its main function has been to consolidate democratic processes, institutions and values. This consolidation, however, is now seen to be under threat from major social and economic influences including globalization, populism, fundamentalisms and the negative use of social media. These influences pose a major threat to, and provide significant challenges for, CCE. The implications of these multiple influences for the future are that democratic values may not be a given and support for democracy cannot be assumed. Future citizens will need to evaluate information critically, to weigh up competing interpretations and most importantly of all to make decisions that are grounded in moral and ethical values. These citizens will not only be active and engaged but also knowledgeable, equipped with moral purpose and integrity and willing to defend democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dumas, C. (2010). Globalisation fractures—How major nations’ interests are now in conflict. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S. (2000). Law and religion: A critical anthology. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2016, September 29). Brangelina is dead. So, is the end nigh for globalisation? South China Morning Post, p. A11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1989, Summer). The end of history? The National Interest, 16, 3–18. Retrieved August 5, 2017 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/24027184?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

  • Gos, D. (2016, May 6). Is Globalization Really Fueling Populism? Retrieved September 26, 2016, from Project Syndicate: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/understand-factors-behind-rising-populism-by-daniel-gros-2016-05?barrier=true.

  • Havas. (2011). Milenials: The challenger generation. Prosumer Report (Vol. 10). Retrieved August 5, 2017 from http://mag.havas.com/prosumer-report/millennials-the-challenger-generation/.

  • Kennedy, K. (2007). Student constructions of ‘active citizenship’: What does participation mean to students? British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(3), 304–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, K. (2010). Neo-statism and post-globalization contexts for new times. In A. Reed & J. Gill (Eds.), Globalization, the nation-state and the citizen—Dilemmas as a direction for civic and citizenship education (pp. 223–229). New York & London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, K. (2016). Global citizenship education for a fractured world. Curriculum Perspectives, 36(2), 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuang, X. (2016). Alienated and disaffected students: The civic capacity of ‘outsiders’ in cross cultural context Unpublished (Ph.D. thesis). The Education University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, T. (1990). Social theory and modernity—Critique, dissent and revolution. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCants, W. (2015). The ISIS apocalypse: The history, strategy, and doomsday vision of the Islamic State. New York: St Martins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagata, J. (2001). Beyond theology: Toward an anthropology of “Fundamentalism”. American Anthropologist, 103(2), 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, A. (2016, October 15). Changing world needs a philosophy of identity. South China Morning Post, p. A14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media—Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs (January/February), 1–9. Retrieved on August 5, 2017 from http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67038/clay-shirky/the-political-power-of-social-media.

  • Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W.W Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2013). The price of inequality. London: Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kennedy, K.J. (2019). What Kind of Future in What Kind of World?. In: Civic and Citizenship Education in Volatile Times. SpringerBriefs in Education(). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6386-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6386-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6385-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6386-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics