Framework Execution and Schematic of Jounce Bumper in Two-Wheeler Fork

  • T. BabuEmail author
  • R. Sudharshan
  • Mohammed Suhail
  • K. Pradeep
  • S. Sanjay Arun
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


A two-wheeler fork connects the front wheel and the axle to its frame, via a pair of triple tree clamps. It typically incorporates the front suspension and front brake, which allows the front wheel to rotate about the steering axis so that the two-wheeler may be steered effectively. The front suspension is either hydraulic or pneumatic shock absorption type. The common type of the front suspension in motorcycle is telescopic forks which are now replaced by mono-shocks that gives a superior vehicle handling and provides safety while braking. The existing front fork suspension assembly consists of fork tubes, sliders, spring, damper rod, spacer, and gaiters to absorb and dampen the shock impulses. The front suspension contributes to the vehicle’s handling, thus providing safety and comfort by keeping the vehicle’s passengers comfortably isolated from bumps, vibration, and road noise. The objective of our work is to enhance the overall suspension efficiency of the front suspension system by introducing jounce bumper (bump stopper) between the spring and damper rod. The jounce bumper is a polymeric component usually made of polyurethane that can improve the noise, vibration, and harshness performance of the entire vehicle. Polyurethane is known for its low density, flexibility, and resistance to fatigue. Hence with the added absorption capacity of the jounce bumper, the effects of front suspension will get enhanced, which will result in reduction in noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH) leading to improved ride quality and vehicle handling.


Jounce suspension Jounce bumper Polyurethane 


  1. 1.
    Ali A, Sidhu RS, Samad MSA (2011) Fatigue characteristic of automotive jounce bumper. New Trends Dev Autom Syst Eng 298–306Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sidhu RS, Ali A (2010) Fatigue life of automotive rubber jounce bumper. Mater Sci Eng 11:1–6Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang Y, Wang L, Ma Z, Wang T (2017) Finite element analysis of a jounce bumper with negative Poisson’s ratio structure. J Mech Eng Sci 231(23):4374–4387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pinjarla P, Lakshmana KT (2012) Design and analysis of a shock absorber. Int J Res Eng Technol 1(4):578–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang Y, Wang L, Ma Z, Wang T (2016) A negative Poisson’s ratio suspension jounce bumper. Mater Des 103:90–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang Y, Zhao W, Zhou G, Gao Q, Wang C (2018) Suspension mechanical performance and vehicle ride comfort applying a novel jounce bumper based on negative Poisson’s ratio structure. Adv Eng Softw 122:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Samad MSA, Ali A, Sidhu RS (2011) Durability of automotive jounce bumper. Mater Des 32:1001–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang Y, Ma Z, Wang L (2016) A finite element stratification method for a polyurethane jounce bumper. J Automob Eng 230(7):983–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang J, Li H (2015) Optimization design on dynamic characteristics and fatigue life of automotive suspension system. J VibroEng 17(5):2547–2558Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Babu
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. Sudharshan
    • 1
  • Mohammed Suhail
    • 1
  • K. Pradeep
    • 1
  • S. Sanjay Arun
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSri Sai Ram Engineering CollegeChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations