Effect of BGA Biofertilizers Using Different Carrier Materials on Rice Crop

  • Rajinder Kaur
  • Dinesh Goyal


The present study laid emphasis on rice crop improvement by development of low-cost blue-green algal biofertilizer comprising of consortium of four ARM blue-green algal strains, viz. Anabaena variabilis (ARM 441), Nostoc muscorum (ARM 442), Tolypothrix tenuis (ARM 443) and Aulosira fertilissima (ARM 444) using different carrier materials, i.e. fly ash (100%), soil (100%), montmorillonite (100%), fly ash + soil (1:1) and fly ash + montmorillonite (1:1). Pot trial was conducted to study their effect on rice cultivar PUSA 1121 using nonsterile soil with a control without inoculation of blue-green algal consortium. At the time of harvest (after 90 days of inoculation), consortium of ARM culture showed highest nitrogen content (0.149%) and carbon (0.39%), respectively, at treatment T3 involving fly ash + soil (1:1) followed by highest grain yield (g per pot) of 14.3 and 12.75 which was recorded in treatment T3, fly ash + soil (1:1) as compared to control. Therefore in the present study, fly ash with combination of soil (1:1) was observed as a good carrier material in place of soil or MMT alone for showing highest nitrogen, carbon and phosphorus content promoting cheap and adaptable method by farmers for organic farming.


Blue-green algae Biofertilizers Soil Fly ash Soil properties Rice 


  1. 1.
    Pabbi S (2008) Cyanobacterial biofertilizers (review). J Eco-friendly Agric 3(2):95–111Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elanwar M, Osman H, Mostafa M, El-Sheekh M, El-Naggar AH, Gheda SF (2010) Effect of two species of cyanobacteria as biofertilizers on some metabolic activities, growth, and yield of pea plant. Biol Fertil Soils 46:861–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pereira I, Ortega R, Barrientos L, Moya M, Reyes G, Kramm V (2009) Development of a biofertilizer based on filamentous nitrogen –fixing cynobacteria for rice crops in Chile. J Appl Phycol 21:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dhar DW, Prasanna R, Singh BV (2007) Comparative performance of three carrier based blue green algal biofertilizers for sustainable rice cultivation. J Sustain Agric 30:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gaind and Gaur (2002) Impact of fly ash and phosphate solubilising bacteria on soybean productivity. Bioresour Technol 85:313–315Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maqubela P, Pearson NSM, Muchaonyerwa P, Acqui LPD, Pardo MT (2010) Effects of cyanobacteria strains selected for their bioconditioning and biofertilization potential on maize dry matter and soil nitrogen status in a South African soil. Jpn Soc Soil Sci Plant Nutr 56:552–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mittra BN, Karmakar S, Swain KD, Ghosh CB (2005) Fly ash – a potential source of soil amendment and a component of integrated plant nutrient supply system. International Ash Utilization Centre for Applied Energy Research, University of Kentucky, Paper#28.
  8. 8.
    Prasanna R, Jaiswal P, Nayak S, Sood A, Kaushik BD (2009) Cyanobacterial diversity in the rhizosphere of rice and its ecological significance. Indian J Microbiol 49:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaur R, Goyal D (2014) Mineralogical comparison of coal fly ash with soil for use in agriculture. J Mater Cycles Waste Mater 18(1):186–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Valiente EF, Ucha A, Quesada A, Leganes F, Carreres R (2000) Contribution of N2 fixing cyanobacteria to rice production: availability of nitrogen from 15N-labelled cyanobacteria and ammonium sulphate to rice. Plant Soil 221:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajinder Kaur
    • 1
  • Dinesh Goyal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyBeant College of Engineering and TechnologyGurdaspurIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologyThapar UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations