Advertisement

Moving Beyond Microwork: Rebundling Digital Education and Reterritorialising Digital Labour

  • Michael GallagherEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Digital labour is often reduced to microwork, granular tasks disassociated from a larger work project, and the labour market to serve these activities is distributed and largely unorganised as a collective body. Larger platform employers such as Amazon Mechanical Turk and Samasource have mobilised large pools of labour towards microtasks which, often, aggregate into a larger work process made opaque to the labour used to complete them. Some link this micowork to poverty alleviation suggesting the public good that might arise from such a workplace and larger industry reconfiguration. Yet, an important feature of microwork is a general placelessness that subverts labour and the communities from which this labour emerges. Education has largely aligned itself with this efficiency and microwork maxims in moves towards granular capacities that are both restrictive and empowering. In these contexts, education is reduced to serving the granularization in work that automation and microwork have accelerated. Yet, there is a role for an education that embraces the ‘messy’ configurations of digital labour, one that provides a futures dimension and a critical capacity for redefining the futures of work. This chapter explores this microwork contexts and suggests several educational reconfigurations that might serve this critical capacity.

Keywords

Microwork Digital labour Digital Education Critical pedagogy Higher Education 

References

  1. Arora, P., & Thompson, L. H. (2018). Crowdsourcing as a platform for digital labor unions. International Journal of Communication, 12, 19.Google Scholar
  2. Azhar, A. (2016). Coding is not enough, we need smarter skills. Financial Times. Retrieved 4 April 2018. https://www.ft.com/content/7babc12c-f662-11e5-96db-fc683b5e52db.
  3. Bailur, S., Masiero, S., & Tacchi, J. (2018). Gender, mobile, and mobile internet| gender, mobile, and development: The theory and practice of empowerment—Introduction. Information Technologies & International Development, 14, 9.Google Scholar
  4. Bass, R., & Eynon, B. (2017). From unbundling to rebundling: Design principles for transforming institutions in the new digital ecosystem. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 49(2), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2017.1286211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayne, S. (2018). Near future teaching. Teaching Matters. Retrieved 4 April 2018. http://www.teaching-matters-blog.ed.ac.uk/?p=2264.
  6. Bayne, S., & Jandrić, P. (2017). From anthropocentric humanism to critical posthumanism in digital education. Knowledge Cultures, 5(2), 197–216.  https://doi.org/10.22381/KC52201712.
  7. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Howcroft, D. (2014). Amazon Mechanical Turk and the commodification of labour. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(3), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braidotti, R. (2013). After cosmopolitanism. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  9. Brusoni, S., & Vaccaro, A. (2017). Ethics, technology and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 223–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3061-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carmel, E., Lacity, M. C., & Doty, A. (2014). The impact of impact sourcing: Framing a research agenda. In R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl, & J. Dibbern (Eds.), Information systems outsourcing (pp. 397–429). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43820-6_16.Google Scholar
  11. Chatterbox. (2018). Homepage. Retrieved 4 April 2018. https://wearechatterbox.org/.
  12. Chuene, D., & Mtsweni, J. (2015). The adoption of crowdsourcing platforms in South Africa. In IST-Africa Conference, 2015 (pp. 1–9). IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAFRICA.2015.7190561
  13. Chui, M., Manyika, J., & Miremadi, M. (2015). Four fundamentals of workplace automation. McKinsey Quarterly, 29(3), 1–9.Google Scholar
  14. Chun, W. H. K. (2011). Programmed visions: Software and memory. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cloudfactory. (2018). Homepage. Retrieved 4 April 2018. https://www.cloudfactory.com/.
  16. Codagnone, C., Abadie, F., & Biagi, F. (2016). The future of work in the ‘Sharing Economy’. Market efficiency and equitable opportunities or unfair precarisation? Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, JRC Science for Policy Report, EUR 27913 EN. Retrieved 4 April 2018. http://www.bollettinoadapt.it/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/future-of-sharingeconomy-EU.pdf.
  17. DWDI. (2018). Homepage. Retrieved 4 April 2018. https://www.dwdi.org/.
  18. Edwards, R., Tracy, F., & Jordan, K. (2011). Mobilities, moorings and boundary marking in developing semantic technologies in educational practices. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19i3.17111.
  19. Ettlinger, N. (2017). Paradoxes, problems and potentialities of online work platforms. Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation, 11(2), 21–38.  https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.11.2.0021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fabo, B., Karanovic, J., & Dukova, K. (2017). In search of an adequate European policy response to the platform economy. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916688861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Facer, K., & Sandford, R. (2010). The next 25 years?: Future scenarios and future directions for education and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00337.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flecker, J., & Schönauer, A. (2016). The production of ‘placelessness’: Digital service work in global value chains. In J. Flecker (Ed.), Space, place and global digital work (pp. 11-30). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48087-3_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Future Happens. (2017). FH1: Digital is not the future. Retrieved 4 April 2018. http://www.futurehappens.org/sample-page/.
  24. Gallagher, M., & Bayne, S. (2018). Future trends: Education and society. Retrieved 4 April 2018. http://www.nearfutureteaching.xyz/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Future-Teaching-trends-education-and-society.pdf.
  25. Galpaya, H., Perampalam, S., & Senanayake, L. (2018). Investigating the potential for micro-work and online-freelancing in Sri Lanka. In L. Pupillo, E. Noam, & L. Waverman (Eds.), Digitized Labor (pp. 229-250). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78420-5_14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gawade, M., Vaish, R., Nduta, M., & Davis, J. (2012). Exploring microwork opportunities through cybercafés. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Symposium on Computing for Development (p. 21). ACM.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2160601.2160628.
  27. Georgetown University. (2017). Designing the future(s). Retrieved 4 April 2018. https://futures.georgetown.edu/.
  28. Graham, M. (2014). A global division of microwork. Oxford Internet Institute. Retrieved 4 April 2018. http://geonet.oii.ox.ac.uk/blog/a-global-division-of-microwork/.
  29. Green, D. D. (2018). Fueling the gig economy: A case study evaluation of upwork.com. Management and Economics Research Journal, 4(2018), 3399.  https://doi.org/10.18639/MERJ.2018.04.523634.
  30. Ho, K. C., Baber, Z., & Khondker, H. (2002). ‘Sites’ of resistance: Alternative websites and state-society relations. The British Journal of Sociology, 53(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310120109366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ibrahim, Y. (2012). Temporality, space and technology: Time-space discourses of call centres. New Technology, Work and Employment, 27(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00275.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Irani, L. (2015). The cultural work of microwork. New Media & Society, 17(5), 720–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813511926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. JANA. (2018). Homepage. Retrieved 4 April 2018. http://www.jana.com/home.
  34. Kuek, S. C., Paradi-Guilford, C. M., Fayomi, T., Imaizumi, S., & Ipeirotis, P. (2015). The global opportunity in online outsourcing (English). Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Retrieved 4 April 2018. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/138371468000900555/The-global-opportunity-in-online-outsourcing.
  35. LaborVoices. (2018). Homepage. Retrieved 4 April 2018. https://www.laborvoices.com/.
  36. Lehdonvirta, V. (2016). Algorithms that divide and unite: Delocalisation, identity and collective action in ‘Microwork’. In J. Flocker (Ed.), Space, place and global digital work (pp. 53–80). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48087-3_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lehdonvirta, V., & Mezier, P. (2013). Identity and self-organization in unstructured work. The University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK. Retrieved 4 April 2018. http://dynamicsofvirtualwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/COST-Action-IS1202-Working-Paper-13.pdf.
  38. Liveops. (2018). Homepage. Retrieved 4 April 2018. https://www.liveops.com/.
  39. McCowan, T. (2017). Higher education, unbundling, and the end of the university as we know it. Oxford Review of Education, 43(6), 733–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1343712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mtsweni, J., & Burge, L. (2014). The potential benefits of mobile microwork services in developing nations: Research opportunities and challenges. In IST-Africa Conference Proceedings, 2014 (pp. 1–10). IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAFRICA.2014.6880636.
  41. Near Future Teaching. (2018). Near future teaching. Retrieved 4 April 2018. http://www.nearfutureteaching.ed.ac.uk/.
  42. Nokelainen, P., Nevalainen, T., & Niemi, K. (2018). Mind or machine? Opportunities and limits of automation. In C. Harteis (Ed.), The impact of digitalization in the workplace (pp. 13–24). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63257-5_2.Google Scholar
  43. Olsen, T., & Carmel, E. (2013). The process of atomization of business tasks for crowdsourcing. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/SO-10-2013-0019.
  44. Pradhan, S. (2017). Analysis of impact sourcing by infusing social innovation in outsourcing for Nepal. In J. Choudrie, M. Islam, F. Wahid, J. Bass J, & J. Priyatma (Eds.), International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries (pp. 829–834). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. QuizRR. (2018). Homepage. Retrieved 4 April 2018. https://www.quizrr.se/.
  46. Regmi, K. D. (2015). Lifelong learning: Foundational models, underlying assumptions and critiques. International Review of Education, 61(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-015-9480-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ross, J., Irani, I., Silberman, M. S., Zaldivar, A., & Tomlinson, B. (2010). Who are the crowdworkers?: Shifting demographics in Amazon Mechanical Turk. In: CHI EA 2010 (pp. 2863–2872).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1753873.
  48. Samasource. (2018). Samasource digital basics. Retrieved 4 April 2018. https://www.samasource.org/training.
  49. Schneider, N. (2018). Everything for everyone: The radical tradition that is shaping the next economy. New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
  50. Scholz, T. (2017). Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital economy. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Scrivener, S., Weiss, M., Ratledge, A., Rudd, T., Sommo, C., & Fresques, H. (2015). Doubling graduation rates: Three-year effects of CUNY’s Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP) for developmental education students. New York, NY: MDRC. Retrieved 4 April 2018. https://www.mdrc.org/publication/doubling-graduation-rates.
  52. Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected age. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  53. Singh, K. (2015). Resisting neoliberal restructuring of education and reclaiming critical educational space. In R. Kumar (Ed.), Neoliberalism, Critical Pedagogy and Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  55. Stanford 2025. (2014). Learning and living at Stanford: An exploration of undergraduate experiences in the future. Retrieved 4 April 2018. http://www.stanford2025.com/.
  56. Tasko. (2018). Homepage. Retrieved 4 April 2018. http://tasko.ai/.
  57. Teachmenow. (2018). Retrieved 4 April 2018. https://teachmenow.com/.
  58. Teevan, J. (2016). The future of microwork. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 23(2), 26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tygel, A., & Kirsch, R. (2015). Contributions of Paulo Freire for a critical data literacy. In Proceedings of Web Science 2015 Workshop on Data Literacy. Retrieved 4 April 2018. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alan_Tygel/publication/278524333_Contributions_of_Paulo_Freire_for_a_critical_data_literacy/links/5581469d08aea3d7096e6a31/Contributions-of-Paulo-Freire-for-a-critical-data-literacy.pdf.
  60. Upwork. (2018). Upwork releases Q1 2018 Skills Index, ranking the 20 fastest-growing skills for freelancers. Retrieved 4 April 2018. https://www.upwork.com/press/2018/05/01/q1-2018-skills-index/.
  61. Urry, J. (2014). Offshoring. Hoboken USA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  62. Webster, J. (2016, September). Microworkers of the gig economy: Separate and precarious. New Labor Forum, 25(3), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796016661511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williamson, B. (2018). Startup schools, fast policies, and full-stack education companies: Digitizing education reform in Silicon Valley. Critical Studies in Education, 59(2), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1186710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations