Dissemination of Research

  • Krittinee NuttavuthisitEmail author


While data analysis and interpretation of qualitative research can yield conceptual descriptions of consumption experience, sharing and presenting of this knowledge may vary depending on the purpose i.e. academic or practical. For academic dissemination, the aim is to make theoretical advancement and to continue development of studies and theories. For practical dissemination, the aim is to address some practical situations or to find strategic programs in response to specific issues in the market. The first half of this chapter explains approaches to achieve theory building and writing reports or publications in leading academic journals. The second half of the chapter describes implications for business practices. This includes understanding of managerial needs and delivering meaningful research results to practitioners focusing on consumption and marketing in the Asian market context.


  1. Abodomagazine (2017) Intelligence: Havas Media Singapore reveals 7 Codes that shape the way Singaporean Millennials think, feel and act. Accessed 8 Jan 2018
  2. Alvesson M, Sandberg J (2011) Generating research questions through problematization. Acad Manag Rev 36(2):247–271Google Scholar
  3. Beer J (2012) Marketing to China: Oreo’s Chinese twist. Accessed 9 Jan 2018
  4. Belk RW (1975) The objective situation as a determinant of consumer behavior. In: Schlinger MJ, Abor A (eds) Advances in consumer research, vol 2. Association for Consumer Research, MI, pp 427–438Google Scholar
  5. Belk RW (2014) Collaborating in visual consumer research. Int J Bus Anthropol 5(1):79–92Google Scholar
  6. Belk RW, Ostergaard P, Groves R (1998) Sexual consumption in the time of AIDS: a study of prostitute patronage in Thailand. J Public Policy Mark 17(2):197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belk RW, Fischer E, Kozinets R (2013) Qualitative consumer & marketing research. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Berg BL (1998a) Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Berg BL (1998b) Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Bharti K, Agrawal R, Sharma V (2014) What drives the customer of world’s largest market to participate in value co-creation? Mark Intell Plann 32(4):413–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bing RL (1987) Plea bargaining: an analysis of the empirical evidence. Doctoral Dissertation, Florida State University, TallahasseeGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown S (1995) Postmodern marketing. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Caelli K, Ray L, Mill J (2003) Clear as mud: toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods 2(2):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chamaret C, Pueschel J, Parguel B (2016) Why some Emiratis buy counterfeit goods when they could afford the genuine product. Accessed 8 Jan 2018
  16. Chang HC (1997) Language and words: communication in the Analects of Confucius. J Lang Soc Psychol 16(2):107–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen GM (2004) The two faces of Chinese communication. Human Commun. J Pac Asian Commun Assoc 7(1):25–36Google Scholar
  18. Chen GM, Miike Y (2006) The ferment and future of communication studies in Asia: Chinese and Japanese perspectives. China Media Res 2(1):1–12Google Scholar
  19. Chio J (2014) Fieldwork, film, and the tourist gaze: making 农家乐 peasant family happiness. Vis Anthropol Rev 30(1):62–72. Scholar
  20. Corley KG, Gioia DA (2011) Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad Manag Rev 36:12–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davis MS (1971) That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philos Soc Sci 1(4):309–344Google Scholar
  22. Davies B, Harré R (1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. J Theory Soc 20(1):43–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Day GS (1990) Market driven strategy: processes for creating value. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Denzin NK (1978) The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. DeVault M (1995) Ethnicity and expertise: racial–ethnic knowledge in sociological research. Gend Soc 9:612–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dissanayake W (2003) Asian approaches to human communication: retrospect and prospect. In: Chen G-M, Miike Y (eds) Asian approaches to human communication [Special issue]. Intercult Commun Stud 12(4):17–37Google Scholar
  27. Dubin R (1978) Theory building (ed). Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Edwards R (1990) Connecting method and epistemology: a white woman interviewing black women. Women’s Stud Int Forum 13:477–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fu XC, Cai LA, Lehto XY (2015) A Confucian analysis of Chinese tourist motivations. J Travel Tour Mark 32(3):180–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geertz C (1973a) The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Geertz C (1973b) Thick description. In: The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books, New York, pp 3–30Google Scholar
  33. Gergen KJ (1982) Toward transformation in social knowledge. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gillette M (2014a) Documenting, dramatizing, and representing China’s porcelain world in broken pots broken dreams. Vis Anthropol Rev 30(1):38–49. Scholar
  35. Gillette MB (2014b) New ethnographic film in the new China. Vis Anthropol Rev 30(1):1–10. Scholar
  36. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldines, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  37. Griffin A, Hauser J (1993) The voice of the customer. Mark Sci 12(1):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hambrick D (2007) Upper echelons theory: an update. Acad Manag Rev 32:334–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hertz R (1996) Introduction: ethics, reflexivity and voice. Qual Sociol 19(1):3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Holt D (1997) Poststructuralist lifestyle analysis: conceptualizing the social patterning of consumption in postmodernity. J Consum Res 23(4):326–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kambil BA, Friesen GB, Sundaram A (1999) Co-creation: a new source of value. Accentue Outlook 2:38–43Google Scholar
  42. Kirkwood WG (1997) Indian thought and the intrapersonal consequences of speaking: implications for ethics in communication. In: Aitken JE, Shedletsky LJ (eds) Intrapersonal communication processes. Speech Communication Association, Annandale, pp 220–226Google Scholar
  43. Kozinets RV, Sherry JF, Storm D, Duhachek A, Nuttavuthisit K, DeBerry-Spence B (2004) Ludic agency and retail spectacle. J Consum Res 31(December):658–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kwek A, Lee Y-S (2015) How “face” matters: Chinese corporate tourists in Australia. J Travel Tour Mark 32(1–2):120–140. Scholar
  45. Leedy P (1993) Practical research: plug and design, 5th edn. Macmillan Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Lim S (2017) Havas unveils seven codes that shapes the way Asian millennials think, feel and act. Accessed 8 Jan 2018
  47. Littlejohn SW, Foss KA (2005) Theories of human communication, 8th edn. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  48. Locke K, Golden-Biddle K (1997) Constructing opportunities for contribution: structuring intertexual coherence and “problematizing” in organizationazional studies. Acad Manag J 40(5):1023–1062Google Scholar
  49. Miike Y (2006) Non-Western theory in Western research? An Asiacentric agenda for Asian communication studies. Rev Commun 6(1–2):4–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miike Y (2007) An Asiacentric reflection on Eurocentric bias in communication theory. Commun Monogr 74(2):272–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. (2017) Cracking the millennial codes Singapore. Accessed 8 Jan 2018
  52. Mod C (2016) The facebook-loving farmers of Myanmar: a dispatch from an internet revolution in progress. Accessed 21 Jan 2016
  53. Nuttavuthisit K (2007a) Branding Thailand: correcting the negative image of sex tourism. Place Branding Public Diplomacy 3(1):21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nuttavuthisit K (2007b) Postmodern consumption and marketing. Sasin J Manag 13(2):133–140Google Scholar
  55. Nuttavuthisit K (2007c) The dynamic of brand equity. Asia-Pac Adv Consum Res 7:2–3Google Scholar
  56. Nuttavuthisit K (2007d) Tourism industry management: from service to story. In: Jayachandran et al (eds) Services management in Asia Pacific: issues and challenges. The Society for Global Business and Economic Development, Sintok, Penerbit Universiti Utara Malaysia, pp 187–206Google Scholar
  57. Nuttavuthisit K (2010a) If you can’t beat them, let them join: the development of strategies to foster consumers’ co-creative practices. Bus Horizon 53(3):315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nuttavuthisit K (2010b) The philosophy of sufficiency economy: a Thai approach to corporate sustainability. The Case of KASIKORNBANKGROUP, The Thailand Research Fund Report, 2010Google Scholar
  59. Nuttavuthisit K (2014) How consumers as aesthetic subjects co-create the aesthetic experience of the retail environment. J Retail Consum Serv 21(4):432–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nuttavuthisit K, DeBerry-Spence B (2003) New retail design development: incorporating consumer perspectives in the architectural design of servicescapes. Adv Consum Res 30:209Google Scholar
  61. Nuttavuthisit K, Passakonjaras S, Siripant S (2010) A study on opportunities and challenges in the US market after the economic downturn. The Gem and Jewelry Institute of Thailand research reportGoogle Scholar
  62. Passakonjaras S, Nuttavuthisit K, Siripant S (2008) The study of trade and consumption behavior of gem and jewelry market in Austria and Ukraine. The Gem and Jewelry Institute of Thailand research reportGoogle Scholar
  63. Pichyangkul C, Nuttavuthisit K, Israsena P (2012) Co-creation at the front-end: a systematic process for radical innovation. Int J Innov Manag Technol 3(2):121–127Google Scholar
  64. Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V (2000) Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Bus Rev 78(1):79–90Google Scholar
  65. Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V (2004) Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. J Interact Mark 18(3):5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pratt MG (2008) Fitting oval pegs into round holes: tensions in evaluating and publishing qualitative research in top-tier North American journals. Organ Res Methods 11:481–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pratt MG (2009) For the lack of a boilerplate: tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Acad Manag J 52(5):858–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Punch M (1994) Politics and ethics in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 83–95Google Scholar
  69. Smith KG, Hitt MA (2006) Great minds in management: the process of theory development. Soc Bus Rev 1(3):280–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sobh R, Belk R, Gressel J (2014) Mimicry and modernity in the Middle East: fashion invisibility and young women of the Arab Gulf. Consumption Markets Cult 17:392–412. Scholar
  71. Stayman DM, Deshpande R (1989) Situational ethnicity and consumer behavior. J Consum Res 16(3):361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sunderland PL, Denny RM (2007) Doing anthropology in consumer research. Left Coast Press, Walnut CreekGoogle Scholar
  73. Thompson C, Pollio H, Locander W (1994) The spoken and the unspoken: a hermeneutic approach to understanding the cultural viewpoints that underlie consumers’ expressed meanings. J Consum Res 21(3):432–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tu WM (1996) Confucian traditions in east Asian modernity. Bull Am Acad Arts Sci 50(2):12–39Google Scholar
  75. Tu WM (2001) The ecological turn in new confucian humanism: implication for China and the world. Daedalus 130(4):243–264Google Scholar
  76. Whetten D (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad Manag Rev 14(4):490–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Williams C, Heikes J (1993) The importance of researcher’s gender in the in-depth interview: evidence from two case studies of male nurses. Gend Soc 7:280–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wolcott HF (1994) Transforming qualitative data: description, analysis, and interpretation. SAGE Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sasin Graduate Institute of Business AdministrationChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations