The Anthropological Dimensions of the Preparation of Youth for Marriage and Family

  • Birutė ObelenienėEmail author


Today, in the face of cultural challenges, dramatically decreased birth rate and the collapse of marriage and family institution, there is no doubt that preparation of youth for marriage and family (PYMF) is now, more than ever, necessary. The changes that have taken place in almost all modern societies demand that not only the family but also the school and Church be involved in this process.


  1. Anderson, C., & Granados, J. (2009). Called to love. US: The Doubleday Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  2. Catechism of the Catholic Church. (1993). Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Google Scholar
  3. Congregation for Catholic Education. (2013). Educating to intercultural dialogue in Catholic schools living in harmony for a civilization of love. Retrieved from
  4. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. (2004). Letter to the bishops of the Catholic Church on the collaboration of men and women in the church and in the world. Retrieved from
  5. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. (2008). Instruction dignitas personae on certain bioethical questions. Retrieved from
  6. De Irala, J., Osorio, A., Beltramo, C., Carlos, S., & López del Burgo, C. (2014). The politics of ‘Comprehensive Sexuality Education’. Briefing Paper, 2014. Retrieved from“Comprehensive-Sexuality-Education”-revised-date.pdf.
  7. Fromas, E. (1999). Menas mylėti. Vilnius: Asveja.Google Scholar
  8. IPPF. (2010). IPPF framework for comprehensive sexuality education (CSE). Retrieved from
  9. Juškevičius, J. (2007). Kai kurie teisės į gyvybę prenataliniu laikotarpiu probleminiai aspektai. Sveikatos mokslai, 17(2), 764–774.Google Scholar
  10. Kulpys, Ž. (2009). Krikščioniškoji kūno teologija: vedybinė kūno prasmė. Daktaro disertacija. Kaunas: VDU.Google Scholar
  11. Obelenienė, B., & Narbekovas, A. (2016). Human dignity as a universal moral dimension of the preparation of youth for marriage and family life. In J. Stala & J. Garmaz (Eds.), Strengthening families. Kraków: Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow Press.Google Scholar
  12. Obelenienė, B., & Narbekovas, A. (2017). Evaluation of content about human sexuality and Procreation in school textbooks in Lithuania. In The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 20, pp. 197–205. Retrieved from
  13. Pew Research Center. (2017). Gay marriage around the world. Retrieved from
  14. Pope Benedict XVI. (2005). Encyclical letter Deus Caritas est. Retrieved from
  15. Pope John Paul II. (1981). Apostolic exhortation familiaris consortio. Retrieved from
  16. Pope John Paul II. (1994). Letter to families gratissimam sane. Retrieved from
  17. Pope John Paul II. (2006). Man and woman he created them. A theology of the body. Boston: Pauline Books and Media.Google Scholar
  18. Pope Paul VI. (1968). Encyclical letter Humanae vitae. Retrieved from
  19. Pranevičienė, B., & Margevičiūtė, A. (2012). The right to religious education in Lithuania. Jurisprudence, 19(2), 443–458.Google Scholar
  20. Skinkaitis, R. (2016). Žmogaus, sukurto pagal dievo paveikslą ir panašumą, teologinė perspektyva (Monografija). Kaunas: VDU.Google Scholar
  21. The Holy See. (1983). Charter of the rights of the family presented by the Holy See to all persons, institutions, and authorities concerned with the mission of the family in today’s world. Retrieved from
  22. The Pontifical Council for the family. (1995). The truth and meaning of human sexuality: Guidelines for education within the family. Retrieved from
  23. UN. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from:
  24. Wojtyla, K. (1994). Meilė ir atsakomybė. Vilnius: Alka.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vytautas Magnus UniversityKaunasLithuania

Personalised recommendations