Skip to main content

Any Rain on Victoria Lake Is Only a Drop in the Bucket: A CGE Analysis of the Effects of Water Shortages on Food Security in Uganda

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economy-Wide Modeling of Water at Regional and Global Scales

Part of the book series: Advances in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling ((AAGEM))

  • 475 Accesses

Abstract

Using a dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE ) model of Uganda, we simulate the effects of water shortages and their impact on agricultural production and the broader Ugandan economy. It is expected that Ugandan crop production will be hit hard over the next forty years by increasing temperatures and decreasing precipitation associated with climate change . We use forecasts from the literature for ten specific crop outputs to simulate the effects of weather-related agricultural disruption on the rest of the economy. We are particularly interested in the effects on food security in Uganda. We find that Uganda is far from being food secure, and hypothesize that if the pessimistic forecasts from the literature were to become true, then the situation would deteriorate significantly. The adaptation strategies for Uganda should focus on the following: the country should diversify agricultural production to include more hardy crops; build transport infrastructure to improve access to the available food to all citizens, but also to enable the expansion of the manufacturing industry, which is dependent on trade between regions; improve sanitation conditions significantly in both rural and urban areas, and develop water infrastructure so that households and agricultural industries can gain better access to an increasingly scarce resource.

The work described in this chapter was carried out at the Centre of Policy Studies and the University of Pretoria. The original UgAGE model was developed for the Ugandan Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development. We kindly acknowledge their support. The model used in this chapter has been adapted to focus on agriculture and food security . The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the early 1970s there was scarcity in the world grain market, soaring prices and famines spread over several countries of Asia and Africa. A world food conference was held in 1974 to address world hunger (FAO 2003).

  2. 2.

    See https://www.wfp.org/node/359289 accessed 24 September 2018.

  3. 3.

    See http://water.org/country/uganda/ accessed 24 September 2018.

  4. 4.

    See https://www.zaragoza.es/contenidos/medioambiente/onu/825-eng-v14.pdf accessed 24 September 2018.

  5. 5.

    See https://www.wsp.org/sites/wsp.org/files/publications/WSP-Uganda-CFD-Profile.pdf accessed 24 September 2018.

  6. 6.

    See https://waterinstitute.unc.edu/files/2015/12/learning-series-uganda-learning-brief-2015-12.pdf accessed 24 September 2018.

  7. 7.

    See https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2012/3062/FS2012-3062.pdf accessed 24 September 2018.

  8. 8.

    See https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ug.html accessed 24 September 2018.

  9. 9.

    Numerical models representing physical processes in the atmosphere, ocean, cryosphere and land surface, used to simulate the response of the global climate system to increasing greenhouse gas concentrations.

  10. 10.

    Improved Global Agro- Ecological Zones method.

  11. 11.

    Uganda coffee production consists of 57.2% Arabica and 42.8% Robusta, which we use as weights here.

  12. 12.

    Other options are available, provided that there are data to support the non-default settings. For example, if there are data on economies or diseconomies of scale in certain industries, then this can be incorporated into the database and into the theoretical structure of the model. Similarly, if there are data suggesting imperfectly competitive market conditions, then this can also be incorporated into both the data and equation structure of the model.

  13. 13.

    The model requires a core database with separate matrices for basic, tax and margin flows for both domestic and imported sources of commodities sold to domestic and foreign users. These separate matrices are not explicitly captured in the SUT. Instead they appear in an aggregate form e.g. the USE table shows the use of commodity c by user u valued at purchasers price. These values should be disaggregated into three separate matrices namely, the use of commodities valued at basic price, tax and margin flows. They then have to be disaggregated to show where these commodities are sourced from, either from the local market or imported from the ROW.

  14. 14.

    See Roos et al. (2015) for a description of how such an IO database can be created from a SUT.

  15. 15.

    Downstream manufactures such as textiles, meat processing, grain and bakery industries contribute little to GDP. Most agricultural commodities, including sorghum , cereals, pulses, rootcrops, cassava and bananas are sold mainly to private households.

  16. 16.

    We imposed observed data for real investments, household and public spending and exports (UBOS 2017).

  17. 17.

    The base year is 2010 where nominal and real value are similar. By multiplying the initial database value with the year-on-year percentage change in industry output, we are able to calculate the value of real output per year.

  18. 18.

    In this simple BOTE there is only one domestic industry, namely grain, and one imported commodity, namely vehicles. Consumers buy both goods while investors use both as inputs into capital production.

  19. 19.

    In our modelling we assume that following a shock capital shifts between industries to eventually eliminate the initial disturbances in rates of return. For example, if the shock increases profitability in an industry, investment will rise (relative to baseline levels). The increase in investment will lead to increased capital. Over time, capital will continue to move into the industry until the initial disturbance in rate of return is eliminated. Note, that in the simulations reported here, the shocks are not once-off, but continue through the projection period. Thus, rates of return almost, but never fully, return to their baseline levels.

  20. 20.

    GDP comprises the cost of capital, the cost of labour, the cost of natural resources and indirect taxes net of subsidies. The combined share of natural resources and indirect taxes is 0.10. In this simulation, the stock of natural resources is held fixed and indirect taxes changes little relative to baseline levels.

  21. 21.

    Tobacco and Cotton .

  22. 22.

    This decomposition is referred to as the Fan decomposition, in recognition of the Chinese scholar who developed the idea while at the Centre of Policy Studies.

References

  • Adhikari U, Nejadhashemi AP, Woznicki SA (2015) Climate change and eastern Africa: a review of impact on major crops. Food Energy Secur 4:110–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison EH, Perry A, Badjeck MC, Adger WN, Brown K, Conway D, Halls AS, Pilling GM, Reynolds JD, Andrew NL, Dulvy NK (2009) Vulnerability of national economies to the impacts of climate change on fisheries. Fish Fisheries 10:173–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asseng S, Foster I, Turner NC (2011) The impact of temperature variability on wheat yields. Glob Change Biol 17:997–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boote KJ, Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Pickering NB (1998) The CROPGRO model for grain legumes. In: Tsuji GY, Hoogenboom G, Thornton PK (eds) Understanding options for agricultural production. Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 99–128

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Broughton WJ, Nernandez G, Blair M, Beebe S, Gepts P, Vanderleyden J (2003) Beans (Phaseolus spp.)- model food legumes. Plant Soil 252:55–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown L (2009) Plan B 4.0: mobilizing to save civilization. W.W. Norton and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn C, Läderach P, Rivera OO, Kirschke D (2015) A bitter cup: climate change profile of global production of Arabica and Robusta coffee. Clim Change 129:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calberto G, Staver C, Siles P (2015) An assessment of global banana production and suitability under climate change scenarios. In: FAO Climate change and food systems: global assessments and implications for food security and trade. FAO, pp 265–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon PB, Rimmer MT (2002a) Dynamic general equilibrium modelling for forecasting and policy: a practical guide and documentation of MONASH. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon PB, Rimmer MT (2002b) Explaining a dynamic CGE simulation with a trade-focused BOTE analysis: the effects of eCommerce on Australia. Centre of Policy Studies Working Paper Series, G-136

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon PB, Parmenter BR, Sutton J, Vincent DP (1982) ORANI: a multisectoral model of the Australian economy. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2002) The state of food insecurity 2001. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2003) Trade reforms and food security—conceptualizing the linkages. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2013a) FAOSTAT online statistical service. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermont AM (2009) Cassava and soil fertility in intensifying smallholder farming systems of East Africa. PhD dissertation. Wageningen University, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher G (2009) World food and agriculture to 2030/50: how do climate change and bioenergy alter the long-term outlook for food, agriculture and resource availability? http://www.fao.org/3/a-ak972e.pdf accessed 24 September 2018

  • Galvin KA, Thornton PK, Boone RB, Sunderland J (2004) Climate variability and impacts on east African livestock herders: the Maasai of Ngorongoro Conservation Area. Afr J Range Forage Sc 21:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison WJ, Horridge JM, Jerie M, Pearson KR (2016) GEMPACK manual, GEMPACK Software. http://www.copsmodels.com/gpmanual.htm accessed 24 September 2018

  • Harrison WJ, Pearson KR (1996) Computing solutions for large general equilibrium models using GEMPACK. Comput Ec 9:83–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepworth N (2010) Climate change vulnerability and adaptation preparedness in Uganda. https://ke.boell.org/sites/default/files/uganda_climate_change_adaptation_preparedness.pdf accessed 24 September 2018

  • International Trade Centre (ITC) (2011) Cotton and climate change: impacts and options to mitigate and adapt. http://www.intracen.org/Cotton-and-Climate-Change-Impacts-and-options-to-mitigate-and-adapt/ accessed 24 September 2018

  • Jarvis A, Ramirez-Villegas J, Campo BVH, Navarro-Racines C (2012) Is Cassava the answer to African climate change adaptation? Trop Plant Bio 5:9–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Fritz S, Van Wesenbeeck CFA, Fuchs M, You L, Obersteiner M (2008) A spatially explicit assessment of current and future hotspots of hunger in sub-Saharan Africa in the context of global change. Glob Planet Change 64:222–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Field CB (2007) Global scale climate-crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Env Research Letters 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Burke MB, Tebaldi C, Mastrandrea MD, Falcon WP, Naylor RL (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319:607–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DV, Banziger M, Magorokoso C, Vivek B (2011) Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials. Nat Climate Change 1:42–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moat J, Williams J, Baena S, Wilkinson T, Gole TW, Challa ZK, Demissew S, Davis AP (2017) Resilience potential of the Ethiopian coffee sector under climate change. Nat Plants 3:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakibuuka B (2016) Eliminating the culture of open defecation in Karamoja. http://www.monitor.co.ug/artsculture/Reviews/Eliminating-culture-open-defecation-Karamoja/691232-3021298-154wsqgz/index.html accessed 24 September 2018

  • Nelson GC, Rosegrant MW, Koo J, Robertson R, Sulser T, Zhu T, Ringler C, Msangi S, Palazzo A, Batka M, Magalhaes M, Valmonte-Santos R, Ewing M, Lee D (2009) Impact on agriculture and costs of adaptation. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/rome2007/docs/Impact_on_Agriculture_and_Costs_of_Adaptation.pdf accessed 24 September 2018

  • Ringler C, Zhu T, Cai X, Koo J, Wang D (2010) Climate change impacts on food security in sub-Saharan Africa: insights from comprehensive climate change scenarios. http://www.ifpri.org/publication/climate-change-impacts-food-security-sub-saharan-africa accessed 24 September 2018

  • Roos EL, Adams PD, van Heerden JH (2015) Constructing a CGE database using GEMPACK for an African country. Comput Econ 46:495–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatsumi K, Yamashiki Y, Valmir da Silva R, Takara K, Matsuoka Y, Takahashi K (2011) Estimation of potential changes in cereals production under climate change scenarios. Hydro Process 25:2715–2725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton PK, Jones PG, Alagarswamy G, Andresen J (2009) Spatial variation of crop yield response to climate change in East Africa. Glob Env Change 19:54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) (2017) Annual GDP data. Available at http://www.ubos.org/statistics/macro-economic/annual-gdp/ accessed 31 January 2017

  • Van Asten PJA, Fermont AM, Taulya G (2011) Drought is a major yield loss factor for rainfed East African highland banana. Agri Water Manage 98:541–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortmann CS, Kirby RA, Eledu CA, Allen DJ (1998) Atlas of common bean production in Africa. CIAT-Pan-African Bean Research Alliance, Kampala

    Google Scholar 

  • You L, Rosegrant MW, Fang C, Wood S (2005) Impact of global warming on Chinese wheat productivity. IFPRI, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan H. van Heerden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van Heerden, J.H., Roos, E.L., Adams, P.D., Kilimani, N. (2019). Any Rain on Victoria Lake Is Only a Drop in the Bucket: A CGE Analysis of the Effects of Water Shortages on Food Security in Uganda. In: Wittwer, G. (eds) Economy-Wide Modeling of Water at Regional and Global Scales. Advances in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6101-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6101-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6100-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6101-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics