Skip to main content

High School Spaces and Student Transitioning: Designing for Student Wellbeing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Transition to high school can be challenging for students who encounter a complex new learning environment and unfamiliar physical spaces. Little research examines relationships between physical school spaces and wellbeing at this critical stage when students are at risk of disengagement from learning . This qualitative case study explored Year 7 students’ wellbeing experience and needs when transitioning to high school in Queensland , Australia . Findings indicate that Year 7 students: prefer their home area where they feel supported; need fresh air and outdoor spaces to run and play ; gravitate towards informal spaces such as handball courts and gardens; use the library for relaxation and quiet time alone; and feel intimidated and unsafe among older students in interstitial spaces such as pathways and stairwells. The study’s findings support a set of suggestions for designing school spaces that enhance the wellbeing of Year 7 students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkinson, S., Fuller, S., & Painter, J. (Eds.). (2012). Wellbeing and place. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2016). My school. https://www.myschool.edu.au/.

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2012). Social and emotional wellbeing: Development of a Children’s headline indicator. Information Paper. Canberra: AIWH. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/children-youth/social-emotional-wellbeing-development-of-chi/contents/table-of-contents.

  • Barber, B. K., & Olsen, J. A. (2004). Assessing the transitions to middle and high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(1), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J., Batemann, D., Loughlin, J., O’Mara, J. & Aranda, G. (2011). Research into the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes: Literature review. Paper No. 22. Melbourne: Department of Education and Early Childhood Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland, D. (2012). Analysing children’s drawings: Applied imagination. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 35(3), 235–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bland, D., Hughes, H., & Willis, J. (2013). Reimagining learning spaces: A research report for the Queensland Council for Social Science Innovation. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/109555/.

  • Brewin, M., & Statham, J. (2011). Supporting the transition from primary school to secondary school for children who are looked after. Educational Psychology in Practice, 27(4), 365–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C. (2014). Looking back to imagine the future: Connecting with the radical past in technologies of school design. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2014). Making the case for space: The effect of learning spaces on teaching and learning. Curriculum and Teaching, 29(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardellino, P., Leiringer, R., & Clements-Croome, D. (2009). Exploring the role of design quality in the building schools for the future. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 5(4), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2011). Breaking methodological boundaries? Exploring visual, participatory methods with adults and young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(3), 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments: A critical review of literature. Learning Environment Research, 17, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Training (DET). (2018). A flying start for Queensland children. Brisbane: Queensland Government. http://flyingstart.qld.gov.au/Pages/home.aspx.

  • Desjardins, R. (2008). Researching the links between education and well-being. European Journal of Education, 43(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraillon, J. (2004). Measuring student well-being in the context of Australian schooling: Discussion paper. Victoria: ACER/MCEETYA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, J. M. (2010). Arts-based research. In J. Higgs, N. Cherry, R. Macklin, & R. Ajjawi (Eds.), Researching practice: A discourse on qualitative methodologies (pp. 217–226). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gislason, N. (2009). Mapping school design: A qualitative study of the relations among facilities design, curriculum delivery, and school climate. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(4), 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A., & Hutton, L. (2012). Design for the changing educational landscape: Space, place and the future of learning. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, H., Franz, J., Willis, J., Bland, D., & Rolfe, A. (2016). High school spaces and student transitioning: Designing for student wellbeing. Research report for Queensland Department of Education and Training. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/109555/.

  • Lamb, S. Walstab, A., Teese, R., Vickers, M., & Rumberger, R. (2004). Staying on at school: Improving student retention in Australia. Queensland Department of Education and the Arts. http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/studentretention_main_file.pdf.

  • Luz, A. (2008). The [design of] educational space: A process-centred built pedagogy. In A. Clarke, M. Evatt, P. Hogarth, J. Lloveras & L. Pons (Eds.), Proceedings of E&PDE 2008: International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (pp. 339–344). Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, 4–5 September, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, E., McMaugh, A., & O’Sullivan, K. (2012). Perceptions of primary to secondary school transition: Challenge or threat? Issues in Educational Research, 22(2), 298–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marley, J., Nobe, M., Clevenger, C., & Banning, J. (2015). Participatory post-occupancy evaluation (PPOE): A method to include students in evaluating health-promoting attributes of a green school. Children, Youth and Environments, 25(1), 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (MCEETYA). (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf.

  • National Disability Authority. Centre for Excellence in Universal Design. (NDA). (2014). The 7 principles. Dublin: NDA. http://universaldesign.ie/What-is-Universal-Design/The-7-Principles/.

  • Newton, C., & Fisher, K. (2009). Take 8: Learning spaces: The transformation of educational spaces for the 21st century. Canberra: Australian Institute of Architects.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L. (2008). Understanding individual patterns of learning: Implications for the well-being of students. European Journal of Education, 43(1), 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendergast, D., Flanagan, R., Land, R., Bahr, M., Mitchell, J., Weir, K., et al. (2005). Developing lifelong learners in the Middle Years of Schooling. Brisbane: The State of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland. Department of Education and Training (DET). (2015). School enrolment management plans. http://education.qld.gov.au/schools/catchment/.

  • Rudd, P., Reed., F. & Smith, P. (2008). The effects of the school environment on young people’s attitudes towards education and learning. Summary Report. Berkshire: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanoff, H. (2001). School building assessment methods. Washington DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, C., Graham, A., & Thomas, N. (2015). Imagining an ideal school for wellbeing: Locating student voice. Journal of Educational Change, 16, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, R. G. (1987). Social transition and adolescent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1987(37), 33–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soutter, K. (2011). What can we learn about wellbeing in school? Journal of Student Wellbeing, 5(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, C. (2009). Effects of school design on student outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(3), 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Emery, C. & Bayliss, P. (2012). Children’s social and emotional wellbeing in schools: A critical perspective. Bristol: Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, A., & Malekzadeh, M. (2015). Exploring the use of new school buildings through post-occupancy evaluation and participatory action research. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(6), 440–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolner, P. (Ed.). (2015). School design together. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Queensland Department of Education and Training (DET) supported this research through funding and allowing access to schools. The research was carried out with ethical clearance from QUT (1600000299) and permission from DET.

Sincere thanks to the students, school leaders and Year 7 teachers for so willingly collaborating in data collection and sharing insights and creative ideas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilary Hughes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hughes, H., Franz, J., Willis, J., Bland, D., Rolfe, A. (2019). High School Spaces and Student Transitioning: Designing for Student Wellbeing. In: Hughes, H., Franz, J., Willis, J. (eds) School Spaces for Student Wellbeing and Learning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6092-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6092-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6091-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6092-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics