Abstract
Experiments have become part and parcel of today’s economics. Experimental evidence is used to update and to refute economic theories but also helps in formulating new theories or policies. Experimental evidence and (quasi)experimental designs are becoming increasingly popular in many fields of applied economics. The consequences of this transformation are deep enough to prompt methodological reflection at least as wide-ranging and radical, as the change itself. In this discussion, seemingly outdated distinctions may gain new significance and inspire more general questions on the structure and perspectives of current economic science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amable, B., Boyer, R., & Lordon, F. (1997). The ad hoc in economics: the pot calling the Kettle Black. In A. D’Autume & J. Cartelier (Eds.), Is economics becoming a hard science? (pp. 252–275). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 3–30.
Backhouse, R., & Cherrier, B. (2017). The age of the applied economist: The transformation of economics since the 1970s. History of Political Economy, 49(annual suppl.). 1–33.
Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2007). Economic experiments and the construction of markets. In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Greif, A. (1997). Cliometrics after 40 years. American Economic Review, 87(2), 400–403.
Guala, F. (2007). How to do things with experimental economics. In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gul, F., & Pesendorfer, W. (2008). The case for mindless economics. In A. Caplin & A. Shotter (Eds.), The foundations of positive and normative economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hands, W. D. (2014). Normative ecological rationality: Normative rationality in the fast-and-frugal- heuristics research program. Journal of Economics Methodology, 21(4), 396–410.
Hamermesh, D. (2013). Six decades of top economics publishing: Who and how? Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 162–172.
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. (Eds.). (2004). Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2016). Performative mechanisms. In I. Boldyrev & E. Svetlova (Eds.), Enacting dismal science: new perspectives on the performativity of economics. Palgrave McMillan: New York, NY.
Korinek, A. (2017). Thoughts on DSGE Macroeconomics: Matching the moment, but missing the point? Available at SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=3022009.
Lee, K. S. (2011). Three ways of linking laboratory endeavours to the realm of policies. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 18(5), 755–776.
Plott, C. R. (1991). Will economics become an experimental science? Southern Economic Journal, 57, 901–919.
Rizvi, S. A. T. (1994). Game theory to the rescue? Contributions to Political Economy, 13(1), 1–28.
Santos, A. C. (2007). The ‘materials’ of experimental economics: Technological versus behavioral experiments. Journal of Economic Methodology, 14, 311–337.
Santos, A. C. (2011). Experimental economics. In J. B. Davis & W. D. Hands (Eds.), The Elgar companion to recent economic methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Sugden, R. (2005). Experiments as exhibits and experiments as tests. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12, 291–302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boldyrev, I. (2019). New Wine into Old Wineskins? Methodenstreit, Agency, and Structure in the Philosophy of Experimental Economics. In: Kawagoe, T., Takizawa, H. (eds) Diversity of Experimental Methods in Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6065-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6065-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6064-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6065-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)