Abstract
Social influence has long been known to be a powerful determinant of individuals’ behavior. In collectivist societies such as rural Base of the Pyramid (BoP) communities, social influence can play an active role in the performances of need-based Do-It-Yourself (DIY) practices for survival. Several scholars have studied DIY communities though Ryan and Deci’s Self-Determination theory that explained how relatedness needs motivate DIY in online forums, hackerspaces, and maker communities. However, not much research has been done on how social influence shapes DIY behaviorism. In this paper, we focus on the BoP and present a study conducted in five rural BoP communities in India. Our research studied how, in such communities, an individual’s propensity to do DIY is influenced by others in their network. Through contextual enquiry, we investigated about the social motives that come to play when there is peer-to-peer influence for doing DIY. Our results indicate a strong disposition among the members of the community to engage in DIY activities that are pursued by others in their social milieu and the various motives that lead them to do so. In conclusion, we also discuss the implications of such social influences for design and how such motives can be leveraged for the diffusion of DIY products and product systems in such communities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Prahalad, C.K.: The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, Pearson Education India (2006)
Karnani, A.: Fighting Poverty Together: Rethinking Strategies for Business, Governments, and Civil Society to Reduce Poverty, Palgrave Macmillan (2001)
Karnani, A.: The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid: how the private sector can help alleviate poverty. Calif. Manag. Rev. 49(4), 90–111 (2007)
Landrum, N.E.: Advancing the “base of the pyramid” debate. Strateg. Manag. Rev. 1(1), 1–12 (2007)
Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., Ahuja, S.: Frugal Innovation: Lessons from Carlos Ghosn, CEO, Renault-Nissan. Harvard Bus. Rev. Blog Network http://blogs.hbr.org/2012/07/frugal-innovationlessons-from/. (2012) Accessed on 3 Dec 2013
Oosterlaken, I.: Design for development: A capability approach. Des. Issues 25(4), 91–102 (2009)
Birtchnell, T.: Jugaad as systemic risk and disruptive innovation in India. Contemp. S. Asia 19(4), 357–372 (2011)
Prabhu, J., Jain, S.: Innovation and entrepreneurship in India: understanding jugaad. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 32(4), 843–868 (2015)
Kiggundu, M.N., Ji, S.: Global growth companies in emerging economies: new champions, new challenges. J. Bus. Behav. Sci. 19(1), 70–90 (2008)
Bhaduri, S., Kumar, H.: Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations to innovate: tracing the motivation of ‘grassroot’innovators in India. Mind Soc. 10(1), 27–55 (2011)
Gupta, A.K., Sinha, R., Koradia, D., Patel, R., Parmar, M., Rohit, P.,… & Chandan, A. Mobilizing grassroots’ technological innovations and traditional knowledge, values and institutions: articulating social and ethical capital. Futures. 35(9), 975–987 (2003)
Gupta, A. K. (2006). From sink to source: The Honey Bee Network documents indigenous knowledge and innovations in India. Innovations: Technol. Governance, Globalization. 1(3), 49–66
Toffler, A., Alvin, T.: The Third Wave, pp. 32–33. Bantam books, New York (1981)
Ranjan, A., Ranjan, M.P. (Eds.). (2009). Handmade in India: A Geographic Encyclopedia of Indian Handicrafts, Abbeville Press
Reubens, R.: Bamboo canopy: creating new reference-points for the craft of the Kotwalia community in India through sustainability. Craft Research 1(1), 11–38 (2010)
Wolf, M., McQuitty, S.: Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes. AMS review 1(3–4), 154–170 (2011)
Wolf, M., McQuitty, S.: Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes. AMS review 1(3–4), 154–170 (2011)
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 68 (2000)
Freeman, S.: Immersed In pellet technology: motivation paths of innovative DIYers. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 16(1), 54–80 (2015)
Lakhani, K.R., Wolf, R.G.: Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Perspectives on free and open source software 1, 3–22 (2005)
Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson B, Gaudet H (1944) The People’s choice: how the voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign (Duell, Sloan and Pearce, New York)
Katz, E., Lazarsfeld, P.F.: Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ (1955)
Troldahl, V.C.: A field test of a modified “two-step flow of communication” model. Public Opin Q 30(4), 609–623 (1966)
Kim, D.K., Chitnis, K., Vasanti, P.N., Singhal, A.: Opinion leadership in Indian villages and diffusion of e-Choupal. J. Creative Commun. 2(3), 345–360 (2007)
Ryan, B., Gross, N.C.: The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural sociol. 8(1), 15 (1943)
Van den Bulte, C., Lilien, G.L.: Medical innovation revisited: social contagion versus marketing effort. Am. J. Sociol. 106(5), 1409–1435 (2001)
Burt, R.S.: Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am. J. Sociol. 92(6), 1287–1335 (1987)
Contractor, N.S., DeChurch, L.A.: Integrating social networks and human social motives to achieve social influence at scale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111(Supplement 4), 13650–13657 (2014)
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers
Festinger, L.: A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7(2), 117–140 (1954)
Sherif, M.: The psychology of social norms (1936)
Cartwright, D.: Influence, leadership, control (1965)
Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R.: The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117(3), 497 (1995)
Byrne D (1961) Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 62(3):713–715. 61
Baumeister, R.F.: A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychol. Bull. 91(1), 3 (1982)
Bicchieri, C. (2016). Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms, Oxford University Press
Bakker, J.H.: The Gandhian approach to swadeshi or appropriate technology: a conceptualization in terms of basic needs and equity. J. Agric. Ethics 3(1), 50–88 (1990)
Rural Spark. Accessed on 21st May 2018 from URL: http://www.ruralspark.com/
Norman, D.A.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, Basic Books (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Majumdar, P., Banerjee, S., Diehl, JC., Van Engelen, J.M.L. (2019). Connected Us! How Social Motives Determine DIY Behaviorism in Rural Base of the Pyramid Communities. In: Chakrabarti, A. (eds) Research into Design for a Connected World. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 134. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_70
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_70
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5973-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5974-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)