Skip to main content

Connected Us! How Social Motives Determine DIY Behaviorism in Rural Base of the Pyramid Communities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research into Design for a Connected World

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 134))

Abstract

Social influence has long been known to be a powerful determinant of individuals’ behavior. In collectivist societies such as rural Base of the Pyramid (BoP) communities, social influence can play an active role in the performances of need-based Do-It-Yourself (DIY) practices for survival. Several scholars have studied DIY communities though Ryan and Deci’s Self-Determination theory that explained how relatedness needs motivate DIY in online forums, hackerspaces, and maker communities. However, not much research has been done on how social influence shapes DIY behaviorism. In this paper, we focus on the BoP and present a study conducted in five rural BoP communities in India. Our research studied how, in such communities, an individual’s propensity to do DIY is influenced by others in their network. Through contextual enquiry, we investigated about the social motives that come to play when there is peer-to-peer influence for doing DIY. Our results indicate a strong disposition among the members of the community to engage in DIY activities that are pursued by others in their social milieu and the various motives that lead them to do so. In conclusion, we also discuss the implications of such social influences for design and how such motives can be leveraged for the diffusion of DIY products and product systems in such communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Prahalad, C.K.: The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, Pearson Education India (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karnani, A.: Fighting Poverty Together: Rethinking Strategies for Business, Governments, and Civil Society to Reduce Poverty, Palgrave Macmillan (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Karnani, A.: The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid: how the private sector can help alleviate poverty. Calif. Manag. Rev. 49(4), 90–111 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Landrum, N.E.: Advancing the “base of the pyramid” debate. Strateg. Manag. Rev. 1(1), 1–12 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., Ahuja, S.: Frugal Innovation: Lessons from Carlos Ghosn, CEO, Renault-Nissan. Harvard Bus. Rev. Blog Network http://blogs.hbr.org/2012/07/frugal-innovationlessons-from/. (2012) Accessed on 3 Dec 2013

  6. Oosterlaken, I.: Design for development: A capability approach. Des. Issues 25(4), 91–102 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Birtchnell, T.: Jugaad as systemic risk and disruptive innovation in India. Contemp. S. Asia 19(4), 357–372 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Prabhu, J., Jain, S.: Innovation and entrepreneurship in India: understanding jugaad. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 32(4), 843–868 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiggundu, M.N., Ji, S.: Global growth companies in emerging economies: new champions, new challenges. J. Bus. Behav. Sci. 19(1), 70–90 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bhaduri, S., Kumar, H.: Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations to innovate: tracing the motivation of ‘grassroot’innovators in India. Mind Soc. 10(1), 27–55 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta, A.K., Sinha, R., Koradia, D., Patel, R., Parmar, M., Rohit, P.,… & Chandan, A. Mobilizing grassroots’ technological innovations and traditional knowledge, values and institutions: articulating social and ethical capital. Futures. 35(9), 975–987 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta, A. K. (2006). From sink to source: The Honey Bee Network documents indigenous knowledge and innovations in India. Innovations: Technol. Governance, Globalization. 1(3), 49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Toffler, A., Alvin, T.: The Third Wave, pp. 32–33. Bantam books, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ranjan, A., Ranjan, M.P. (Eds.). (2009). Handmade in India: A Geographic Encyclopedia of Indian Handicrafts, Abbeville Press

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reubens, R.: Bamboo canopy: creating new reference-points for the craft of the Kotwalia community in India through sustainability. Craft Research 1(1), 11–38 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolf, M., McQuitty, S.: Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes. AMS review 1(3–4), 154–170 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wolf, M., McQuitty, S.: Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes. AMS review 1(3–4), 154–170 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 68 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Freeman, S.: Immersed In pellet technology: motivation paths of innovative DIYers. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 16(1), 54–80 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lakhani, K.R., Wolf, R.G.: Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Perspectives on free and open source software 1, 3–22 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson B, Gaudet H (1944) The People’s choice: how the voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign (Duell, Sloan and Pearce, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Katz, E., Lazarsfeld, P.F.: Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Troldahl, V.C.: A field test of a modified “two-step flow of communication” model. Public Opin Q 30(4), 609–623 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, D.K., Chitnis, K., Vasanti, P.N., Singhal, A.: Opinion leadership in Indian villages and diffusion of e-Choupal. J. Creative Commun. 2(3), 345–360 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ryan, B., Gross, N.C.: The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural sociol. 8(1), 15 (1943)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van den Bulte, C., Lilien, G.L.: Medical innovation revisited: social contagion versus marketing effort. Am. J. Sociol. 106(5), 1409–1435 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Burt, R.S.: Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am. J. Sociol. 92(6), 1287–1335 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Contractor, N.S., DeChurch, L.A.: Integrating social networks and human social motives to achieve social influence at scale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111(Supplement 4), 13650–13657 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  30. Festinger, L.: A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7(2), 117–140 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sherif, M.: The psychology of social norms (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cartwright, D.: Influence, leadership, control (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R.: The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117(3), 497 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Byrne D (1961) Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 62(3):713–715. 61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Baumeister, R.F.: A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychol. Bull. 91(1), 3 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bicchieri, C. (2016). Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bakker, J.H.: The Gandhian approach to swadeshi or appropriate technology: a conceptualization in terms of basic needs and equity. J. Agric. Ethics 3(1), 50–88 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rural Spark. Accessed on 21st May 2018 from URL: http://www.ruralspark.com/

  39. Norman, D.A.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, Basic Books (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prarthana Majumdar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Majumdar, P., Banerjee, S., Diehl, JC., Van Engelen, J.M.L. (2019). Connected Us! How Social Motives Determine DIY Behaviorism in Rural Base of the Pyramid Communities. In: Chakrabarti, A. (eds) Research into Design for a Connected World. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 134. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_70

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_70

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5973-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5974-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics