Abstract
What are generic processes by which theories of cognitive and social sciences provide interaction design input for complex safety-critical systems? In this article, we identify the need for intervening cognitive structures in the form of conceptual-based abstract frameworks that translate the insights from human studies to the design of human technology interaction in safety-critical systems. Using examples of two human systems design frameworks, cognitive work analysis and core task analysis, the aim will be to draw generic implications for these intervening conceptual-based translational structures linking cognitive and social sciences to complex safety-critical interaction design.
Keywords
- Safety-critical systems
- Interaction design
- Translation
- Intermediate structures
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
References
Gaver, W.: Science and design: the implications of different forms of accountability. In: Olson, J.S., Kellogg, W.A. (eds.) Ways of Knowing in HCI, pp. 143–165. Springer, New York (2014)
Norros, L.: Developing human factors/ergonomics as a design discipline. Appl. Ergon. 45, 61–71 (2014)
Robertson, J., Robertson, S.: Mastering the requirements process. Addison-Wesley, Harlow (2017)
Höök, K., Löwgren, J.: Strong concepts: intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 19, 23 (2012)
Ghemraoui, R., Mathieu, L., Tricot, N.: Design method for systematic safety integration. CIRP Ann. 58, 161–164 (2009)
Sadeghi, L., Mathieu, L., Tricot, N., Al Bassit, L., Ghemraoui, R.: Toward design for safety part 1: functional reverse engineering driven by axiomatic design. Presented at the International Conference on Axiomatic Design, 7th ICAD (2013)
Sadeghi, L., Mathieu, L., Tricot, N., Al Bassit, L., Ghemraoui, R.: Toward design for safety part 2: functional re-engineering using axiomatic design and FMEA. Presented at the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Axiomatic Design, ICAD (2013)
Bardzell, J., Bolter, J., Löwgren, J.: Interaction criticism: three readings of an interaction design, and what they get us. Interactions 17, 32–37 (2010)
Lidwell, W., Holden, K., Butler, J.: Universal principles of design, revised and updated: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Rockport Pub (2010)
Löwgren, J.: Toward an articulation of interaction esthetics. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia 15, 129–146 (2009)
Gaver, B., Bowers, J.: Annotated portfolios. Interactions 19, 40–49 (2012)
Vicente, K.J.: Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. CRC-Press, Boca Raton (1999)
Rasmussen, J., Goodstein, L.P., Pejtersen, A.M.: Cognitive systems engineering. Wiley, New York (1994)
Rasmussen, J.: On the structure of knowledge—a morphology of metal models in a man-machine system context. Risø National Laboratory ER (1979)
Dal Vernon, C.R., Sanderson, P.M.: Work domain analysis and sensors II: Pasteurizer II case study. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 56, 597–637 (2002)
Burns, C.M., Kuo, J., Ng, S.: Ecological interface design: a new approach for visualizing network management. Comput. Netw. 43, 369–388 (2003)
Amelink, M.H., Van Paassen, M.M., Mulder, M., Flach, J.M.: Total energy-based perspective flight path display for aircraft guidance along complex approach trajectories. Presented at the Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (2003)
Norros, L.: Acting under uncertainty: the core-task analysis in ecological study of work. VTT Espoo (2004)
Norros, L., Savioja, P., Koskinen, H.: Core-task design: a practice-theory approach to human factors. Synth. Lect. Hum. Centered Inform. 8, 1–141 (2015)
Wahlström, M., Karvonen, H., Norros, L., Jokinen, J., Koskinen, H.: Radical innovation by theoretical abstraction—a challenge for the user-centred designer. Des. J. 19, 857–877 (2016)
Wahlström, M., Karvonen, H., Kaasinen, E., Mannonen, P.: Designing user-oriented future ship bridges–an approach for radical concept design. Ergonomics in Design: Methods and Techniques, pp. 217–231 (2016)
Woods, D.D.: Cognitive technologies: the design of joint human-machine cognitive systems. AI Mag. 6, 86 (1985)
Woods, D.D., Hollnagel, E.: Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)
Stolterman, E., Wiberg, M.: Concept-driven interaction design research. Hum. Comput. Interact. 25, 95–118 (2010)
Stolterman, E., Pierce, J.: Design tools in practice: studying the designer-tool relationship in interaction design. Presented at the Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, New York, NY, USA (2012)
Stolterman, E.: The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. Int. J. Des. 2 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kant, V., Wahlström, M. (2019). Conceptual Intermediate Structures for Interaction Design in Complex Safety-Critical Systems. In: Chakrabarti, A. (eds) Research into Design for a Connected World. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 134. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5973-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5974-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)