International Education: A Potentiality for Ethical Development

Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 48)


This chapter sketches the evolution of international education in terms of definition, approach and rationale from the late nineteenth century to current days. It notes the uneven terrain of international education practices that favour Western universities as sites of knowledge production and consumption. It discusses the research landscape of international education in relation to returning graduates and migrants, noting a marked absence in attending to graduates or returnees’ socioeconomic contributions to their home countries. The chapter offers Amartya Sen’s capabilities approach as a framework to view international education as a potentiality for ethical development. Anchored in pluralism, the capabilities approach could provide insights about conditions for people-centred development because it allows for evaluation to consider local voices and perspectives of those who live and work in the local communities rather than institutions from afar. In highlighting the potentiality of international education for ethical development, the chapter embraces the vision of education for international understanding and global citizenship – the core ideas of the international education movement when it began in the late nineteenth century and the global education goal of the United Nation 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 4).


  1. Adams, D. (2002). Education and national development: Priorities, policies, and planning. Hong Kong: Asian Development Bank. Comparative Education Research Centre.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, P. (1975). The transnational experience: An alternative view of cultural shock. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 15, 13–23.Google Scholar
  3. Alred, P. (1987). Becoming a “Better stranger”. A therapeutic perspective on intercultural experience and/as education. In G. Alred, M. Bryam, & M. Fleming (Eds.), Intercultural experience and education (pp. 14–30). Clevedon: Multilingualmatters.Google Scholar
  4. Altbach, P. (2014, 30 July). What counts for academic productivity in research universities? University World News Global Edition, Issue 320.Google Scholar
  5. Altbach, P., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 290.Google Scholar
  6. Andrews, F. F. (1908). The relation of teachers to the pace movement. Education: A Monthly Magazine, 28, 279–289.Google Scholar
  7. Auletta, A. (2000). A retrospective view of the Colombo Plan: Government policy, departmental administration and overseas students. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(1), 47–58.Google Scholar
  8. Australian Archives (ACT): A 1838/294, 200/6/1/2; Colombo Plan training facilities in Australia – Committee on the future of tertiary education, 1961–1966.Google Scholar
  9. Australian Archives (ACT) A1828/294, 2008/1/1 Part 2; Conditions of training awards – Negotiations on interdepartmental training agreement 1955–1967.Google Scholar
  10. Australian Education International (AEI). (2017). International student enrolment December 2017. Accessed 17 Dec 2017.
  11. Barnett, R. (2011). Being a university. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Bochner, S., Lin, A., & McLeod, B. (2010). Anticipated role conflict of returning overseas students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 110(2), 265–272.Google Scholar
  13. Brandenburgh, U., & de Wit, H. (2011). The end of internationalization. International Higher Education (Vol. 62, pp. 15–17).Google Scholar
  14. Brandenburgh, U., & de Wit, H. (2012). Getting internationalization back on track. IAU Horizons 17.3 and 18.1. Accessed 10 Sept 2014.
  15. Brickman, W. W. (1964). Historical development of governmental interest in international higher education. In S. Fraser (Ed.), Governmental policy and international education (pp. 17–46). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Campbell, A. (2010). Developing generic skills and attributes of international students: The (ir)relevance of the Australian university experience. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(5), 487–497.Google Scholar
  17. Callan, H. (2000). The international vision in practice: A decade of evolution. Higher Education in Europe, 25(1), 15–23.Google Scholar
  18. Cannon, R. (1999). International education and a professional edge for Indonesian graduates: The third place? In D. Davis & A. Olsen (Eds.), International education: The professional edge (pp. 15–36). A set of research papers presented at the 13th Australian International Education Conference, Freemantle, 1999). Deakin: IDP Education Australia.Google Scholar
  19. Cannon, R. (2000). The outcomes of an international education for Indonesian graduates: The third place? Higher Education Research and Development, 19(3), 357–379.Google Scholar
  20. Carnoy, M. (1974). Education as cultural imperialism. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  21. Carr, W. G. (Ed.). (1945). Only by understanding ((Foreign policy association headline series) 52). New York: Foreign Policy Association.Google Scholar
  22. Carruthers, A. (2001). Exile and return: Deterritorializing national imaginaries in Vietnam and the diaspora. PhD thesis, The University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  23. Cassidy, S. (2006). Developing employability skills: Peer assessment. Higher Education. Education and Training, 48(7), 508–517.Google Scholar
  24. Chen, Y. (2008). The limits of brain circulation: Chinese returnees and technological development in Beijing (Vol. 81, pp. 195–215). Pacific Affairs.Google Scholar
  25. Choi, P. K. (2010). ‘Weep for the Chinese University’: A case study of English hegemony and academic capitalism in higher education in Hong Kong. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 233–252.Google Scholar
  26. Choi, E. (2017). Higher education regionalization in East Asia. International Higher Education Number 90: Summer 2017.Google Scholar
  27. Cox, S., & King, D. (2006). Enhancing graduate employability: Best intentions and mixed outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 169–184.Google Scholar
  28. Crocker, D. (2008). Ethics of global development agency, capability and deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Crossman, J., & Clark, M. (2010). International experience and graduate employability: Stakeholder perceptions on the connection. Higher Education, 59, 599–613.Google Scholar
  30. Cuthbert, D., Smith, W., & Boey, J. (2008). What do we really know about the outcomes of Australian international education? A critical review and prospectus for future research. Journal of Studies in International Education., 12, 255–275.Google Scholar
  31. Daroesman, I. P., & Daroesman, R. (1992). Degrees of success. Canberra: Australian International Development Assistance Bureau and International Development Program.Google Scholar
  32. de Wit, H., & Jooste, N. (2014, July 30). Can international education be truly equal and global? University World News Global Edition Issue 308.Google Scholar
  33. Duggan, S. P. (1920). First annual report of the Director: Institute of International Education. New York: Institute of International Education.Google Scholar
  34. Fong, P. E. (1981). The economic development and the labour market in a newly industrialising country: The experience of Singapore. The Developing Economies, 19(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
  35. Gill, S. (2010). The homecoming: An investigation into the effect that studying overseas had on Chinese postgraduates’ life and work on their return to China. Compare, 40(3), 359–376.Google Scholar
  36. Gross, A., & Connor, A. (2007). Managing Chinese returnees. Mobility Magazine. Accessed January 2017.
  37. Grunsweig, W. and Rinehart, N. (2002) An Introduction. International understanding and global interdependence: Towards a critique of international education. In Walter Grünsweig and Nana Rinehart (eds) Rockin’ in Red Square: Critical approaches to international education in an age of cyberculture, (pp. 5–24). Münster: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
  38. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Harman, G. (2005). Internationalisation of Australian higher education: A critical review of literature and research. In P. Ninnes & M. Hellsten (Eds.), Internationalising higher education: Critical explorations of pedagogy and practice (pp. 119–140). Hong Long: University of Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre.Google Scholar
  40. Harley, J. E. (Ed.). (1931). International understanding: Agencies educating for a new world. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Haywood, T. (2015). International Mindedness and Its Enemies. In M. Hayden, J. Levy, & J. Thomson (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Research in International Education (pp. 45–58). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  42. Huddart, D. (2014). Involuntary associations. Postcolonial studies and world Englishes. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Institute of International Education. (2017, December 17). Open Doors 2016. Retrieved from
  44. Johnsrud, L. K. (1993). Cross-cultural implications of graduate study abroad: The case of Korean academics. Higher Education, 25, 207–222.Google Scholar
  45. Kallich, J., Martel, M., & Bhandari, R. (2017, March). Social justice leaders in action: IFP Impacts in Asia. Ford Foundation International Fellowships Program Alumni Tracking Study Report No. 2. New York: Institute of International Education.Google Scholar
  46. Keats, D. M. (1969). Back in Asia – A follow up study of Australian-trained Asian students. Canberra: Australian National University, Department of Economics Research School of Pacific Studies.Google Scholar
  47. Keeling, R. (2006). The Bologna process and the Lisbon research agenda: The European Commission’s expanding role in higher education discourse. European Journal of Higher Education, 41(2), 203–223.Google Scholar
  48. Kenworthy, L. S. (1947). Social Studies teaching and international understanding. UNESCO seminar on education for international understanding (Sevres). Paris: UNESCO Archives.Google Scholar
  49. Kiley, M. (1999) Expectations and experiences of Indonesian postgraduate students studying in Australia: A longitudinal study. PhD thesis, The University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
  50. Kim, J. (2011). Aspiration for global cultural capital in the stratified realm of global higher education: Why do Korean students go to US graduate schools? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(1), 109–126.Google Scholar
  51. Knight, J. (2014, February 3). The limits of soft power in higher education. University World News Global Edition, Issue 305.Google Scholar
  52. Kyaw, K. (1992). A tracer study of recent graduates: Implications for education and manpower planning (Working Paper Series No. 3.2). Yangon: Myanmar Education Research Bureau.Google Scholar
  53. Leask, B., & de Wit, H. (2016). Reimagining the HE curriculum for the 21st century. University World News Global Edition Issue 438.Google Scholar
  54. Leckey, J., & Mcguigan, M. (1997). Right tracks- wrong rails: The development of generic skills in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 365–378.Google Scholar
  55. Mahbubani, K. (2008). The new Asian hemisphere. The irresistible shift of global power to the East. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  56. Marginson, S. (2007). Have global academic flows created a global labour market? In D. Epstein, R. Boden, R. Deem, F. Rizvi, & S. Wright (Eds.), Geographies of knowledge, geometries of power: Higher education in the 21st century (World year book of education 2008) (pp. 305–318). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Marginson, S. (2014). Student self-formation in international education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(11), 6–22.Google Scholar
  58. Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Markus, A. (1994). Australia race relations 1788–1993. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  60. Maringe, F., Foskett, N., & Woodfield, S. (2013). Emerging internationalisation models in an uneven global terrain: Findings from a global survey. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 43(1), 9–36.Google Scholar
  61. Meadows, E. (2011). From aid to industry: A history of international education in Australia. In D. Davis & B. Mackintosh (Eds.), Making a difference – Australian international education (pp. 50–53). Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
  62. Morris, P., & Sweeting, A. (Eds.). (1995). Education and development in East Asia. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  63. Murphy-LeJeune, E. (2003). An experience of interculturality: Student travellers abroad. In G. Alred, M. Byram, & M. Fleming (Eds.), Intercultural experience and education (pp. 101–113). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  64. Nahas, G. (2012, 10 September). Internationalization and values. IAU Horizons,17.3 and 18.1.Google Scholar
  65. National Archives Records Administration of the US (NARA). Records of US Foreign Assistance in South Vietnam 1955–1968. Accessed September 2015.Google Scholar
  66. Ng, S. W. (2012). Rethinking the mission of internationalization of higher education in the Asia-Pacific region. Compare, 42(3), 439.Google Scholar
  67. Nguyen, P. M. (2017). Intercultural communication: An interdisciplinary approach: When neurons, genes and evolution joined the discourse. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Nye, J. S. (2005, December 29). The rise of China’s soft power. Wall Street Journal Asia.
  69. Organisation of Economic and Development (OECD). (2013). Education at a glance 2013: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. Accessed 19 Sept 2017.
  70. Olsen, M., & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.Google Scholar
  71. Patrick, F. (2013). Neoliberalism, the knowledge economy, and the learner: Challenging the inevitability of the commodified self as an outcome of education. Hindawi Publishing Corporation ISRN Education Volume 2013. Accessed November 2016 from Google Scholar
  72. Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  73. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Pham, L. (2018). International students’ aspiration to contribute to socioeconomic development in Vietnam. In L. T. Tran & S. Marginson (Eds.), Internationalisation in Vietnamese higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  75. Phan Le-Ha. (2017). Transnational education crossing ‘Asia’ and ‘the West’: Adjusted desire, transformative mediocrity, neo-colonial disguise. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  76. Potter, P. B. (1948). An introduction to the study of international organization. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  77. Pritchard, R. (2011). Re-entry trauma: Asian re-integration after study in the West. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(1), 93–111.Google Scholar
  78. Rhoades, R., & Torres, C. (2006). The university, state and market: The political economy of globalization in the Americas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Rizvi, F. (2007). Postcolonialism and globalisation in education. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 7(3), 256–263.Google Scholar
  80. Robertson, S., Hoare, L., & Harwood, A. (2011). Returnees, student-migrants and second chance learners: Case studies of positional and transformative outcomes of Australian international education. Compare: A journal of Comparative and International Education, 41(5), 685–698.Google Scholar
  81. Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3), 61–92.Google Scholar
  82. Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117.Google Scholar
  83. Robeyns, I. (2006). Three models of education. Rights, capabilities and human capital. Theory and Research in Education, 4(1), 69–84.Google Scholar
  84. Scanlon, D. G. (Ed.). (1960). International education: A documentary history. New York: Teachers College of Columbia University, Bureau of Publications.Google Scholar
  85. Scott, W. (1912). World education: A discussion of the favorable conditions for a world campaign for education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82, 169–221.Google Scholar
  87. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Shougee, M. (1998). The experiences, meaning and outcomes of studying abroad: A qualitative multiple-case study. PhD thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  89. Spender, P. (1969). Exercises in diplomacy: The ANZUS Treaty and the Colombo Plan. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Stomfay-Stitz, A. M. (1993). Peace education in America, 1828–1990: Sourcebook for education and research. London: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  91. Sylvester, R. (2015). Historical resources for research in international education. In M. Hayden, J. Levey, & J. Thomson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of research in international education (pp. 13–27). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  92. Teichler, U. (2004). The changing debate on internationalization of higher education. Higher Education, 48(5), 5–26.Google Scholar
  93. Tran, L., & Marginson, S. (2018). Internationalisation of Vietnamese higher education: An overview. In L. T. Tran & S. Marginson (Eds.), Internationalisation in Vietnamese higher education (Higher education dynamics 51) (pp. 1–18). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  94. Tran, T. L., & Pham, L. (2015). International students as intercultural agents: Engagement with domestic students, institutions and the wider community. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(4), 560–581.Google Scholar
  95. UNESCO UIS Statistics. (2018). International student mobility.
  96. Vietnamese International Education Development. (2017). Retrieved from
  97. Waters, J. (2006). Geographies of cultural capital: Education, international migration and family strategies between Hong Kong and Canada. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31, 179–192.Google Scholar
  98. Welch, A. (2013). Different paths, one goal: Southeast Asia as knowledge society. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(2), 197–211.Google Scholar
  99. Willinsky, J. (1998). Learning to divide the world: Education at empires’ end. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  100. Wilson, D. N. (1994). Comparative and international education: Fraternal or Siamese twins? A preliminary genealogy of our twin fields. Comparative Education Review, 38(4), 449–486.Google Scholar
  101. Yashiro, K. (2010). Japan’s returnees. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 16(1–2), 139–164.Google Scholar
  102. Zweig, D., & Yang, F. (2014). Overseas students, returnees, and the diffusion of international norms into post-Mao China. International Studies Review, 16, 252–263.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Technology SydneyUltimoAustralia

Personalised recommendations