Centrifuge Model Studies on the Performance of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Structures

  • B. V. S. ViswanadhamEmail author
Part of the Developments in Geotechnical Engineering book series (DGE)


This paper highlights centrifuge model studies on geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures undertaken at IIT Bombay using a 4.5 m radius large beam centrifuge facility. First, attempt has been made to introduce scaling considerations for modelling geosynthetic materials in a geocentrifuge, like, geotextiles, geogrids from hydraulic and mechanical considerations point of view. Recent studies on the performance of geogrid-reinforced clay liners subjected to differential settlements at 40 gravities, geogrid-reinforced soil walls with marginal backfill at gravities, geotextile-reinforced slopes with variable gravity level and geosynthetic-reinforced slopes subjected to rainfall at 30 gravies are presented. The above studies could bring out the importance of centrifuge modelling along with digital image analyses technique for investigating the performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures before and at failure. The analysis and interpretation of centrifuge test results have yielded valuable information for understanding the failure mechanism of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures. Particularly, the effect of geogrid reinforcement layer in restraining clay-based cracking, effect of chimney drains on the performance of geogrid-reinforced soil walls subjected to seepage, failure mechanism of geotextiles reinforced slopes at the onset of failure and the performance of geosynthetic-reinforced slopes subjected to rainfall using in-flight rainfall simulator are postulated distinctly.


Geosynthetics Centrifuge models Geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures Model tests Centrifuge modelling 



The author would like to acknowledge doctoral research works of Dr. Ratnakar Mahajan, Dr. S. Rajesh, Dr. D. V. Raisinghani, Dr. P. V. Divya, Dr. A. Rajabian, Dr. Sreeja Balakrishnan, Dr. Dipankana Bhattacherjee, Mr. Jaber Mamaghanian and Master students Mr. Subhro Senguptha, Mr. Bibek Kumar Jha and Mr. Ch. Manikumar. Special thanks are due to Dr. Dipankana Bhattacherjee for providing excellent help in editing this manuscript. The authors would like to thank all the funding agencies (like DST, MHRD, IFCPAR) for sponsoring studies and the centrifuge staff at the large beam centrifuge facility of the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India for their active involvement and untiring support during the course of this endeavour.


  1. 1.
    Balakrishnan, S., Viswanadham, B.V.S.: Performance evaluation of geogrid reinforced soil walls with marginal backfills through centrifuge model tests. Geotext. Geomembr. 44(1), 95–108 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bathurst, R.J., Vlachopoulos, N., Walters, D.L., Burgess, P.G., Allen, T.M.: The influence of facing stiffness on the performance of two geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls. Can. Geotech. J. 43(12), 1225–1237 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhattacherjee, D., Viswanadham, B.V.S.: Numerical studies on the performance of hybrid-geosynthetic-reinforced soil slopes subjected to rainfall. Geosynth. Int. 22(6), 411–427 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhattacherjee, D., Viswanadham, B.V.S.: Effect of geocomposite layers on slope stability under rainfall condition. Indian Geotech. J. 48(2), 316–326 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhattacherjee, D., Viswanadham, B.V.S.: Design and performance of an in-flight rainfall simulator in a geotechnical centrifuge. Geotech. Test. J. (ASTM) 41(1), 72–91 (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Divya, P.V., Viswanadham, B.V.S., Gourc, J.P.: Influence of geomembrane on the deformation behaviour of clay-based landfill covers. Geotext. Geomembr. 34, 158–171 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Izawa, J., Kuwano, J.: Centrifuge modeling of geogrid reinforced soil walls subjected to pseudo-static loading. Int. J. Phys. Model. Geotech. 10(6), 1–18 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jewell, R.A.: Soil Reinforcement with Geotextiles. Constrution Indistry Research and Information Association, 332 pp. Special Publication 123, Thomas Telford (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koerner, J., Soong, T.Y., Koerner, R.M.: Earth retaining wall costs in the USA. GRI Report#20, Geosynthetic Institute, 38 p. Folsom, PA (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koerner, R.M.: Designing with Geosynthetics, 6th edn. Xlibris Publishing (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raisinghani, D.V., Viswanadham, B.V.S.: Centrifuge model study on low permeable slope reinforced by hybrid geosynthetics. Geotext. Geomembr. 29(6), 567–580 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rajabian, A., Viswanadham, B.V.S., Ghiassian, H., Salehzadeh, H.: Centrifuge model studies on anchored geosynthetic slopes for coastal shore protection. Geotext. Geomembr. 34, 144–157 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rajesh, S., Viswanadham, B.V.S.: Evaluation of geogrid as a reinforcement layer in clay based engineered barriers. Appl. Clay Sci. 46(2), 153–165 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rajesh, S., Viswanadham, B.V.S.: Development of a motor-based differential settlement simulator setup for a geotechnical centrifuge. Geotech. Test. J. (ASTM) 33(6), 507–514 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rajesh, S., Viswanadham, B.V.S.: Hydro-mechanical behavior of geogrid reinforced soil barriers of landfill cover systems. Geotext. Geomembr. 29(1), 51–64 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rajesh, S., Viswanadham, B.V.S.: Centrifuge modeling and instrumentation of geogrid reinforced soil barriers of landfill covers. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. (ASCE) 138(1), 26–37 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sarsby, R.W.: Geosynthetics in Civil Engineering, 1st edn. The Textile Institute, CRC Press, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Springman, S., Bolton, M., Sharma, J., Balachandran, S.: Modelling and instrumentation of a geotextile in the geotechnical centrifuge. In: Ochiai, H., Hayashi, S., Otani, J. (eds.) Proceedings of International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement Practice, pp. 167–172. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam (Pubs)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Viswanadham, B.V.S., Bhattacherjee, D.: Studies on the performance of geocomposite reinforced low-permeable slopes subjected to rainfall. Jpn. Geotech. Soc. Spec. Publ. 2(69), 2362–2367 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Viswanadham, B.V.S., Jessberger, H.L.: Centrifuge modeling of geosynthetic reinforced clay liner of landfills. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. (ASCE) 131(5), 564–574 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Viswanadham, B.V.S., König, D.: Studies on scaling and instrumentation of a geogrid. Geotext. Geomembr. 22(5), 307–328 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Viswanadham, B.V.S., Mahajan, R.R.: Centrifuge model tests on geotextile reinforced slopes. Geosynth. Int. 14(6), 365–379 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Viswanadham, B.V.S., Rajesh, S.: Centrifuge model test on clay based engineered barriers subjected to differential settlements. Appl. Clay Sci. 42(3–4), 460–472 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Viswanadham, B.V.S., Jha, B.K., Sengupta, S.S.: Centrifuge testing of fiber-reinforced soil liners for waste contained systems. Pract. Period. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste Manag. (ASCE) 13(1):45–58 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Viswanadham, B.V.S., Razeghi, H.R., Mamaghanian, J., Manikumar, C.H.S.G.: Centrifuge model study on geogrid reinforced soil walls with marginal backfills with and without chimney sand drain. Geotext. Geomembr. 45(5), 430–446 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zornberg, J.G., Arriaga, F.: Strain distribution within geosynthetic-reinforced slopes. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. (ASCE) 129(1), 32–45 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayPowai, MumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations