Skip to main content

Breaking CNN-Based Steganalysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Genetic and Evolutionary Computing (ICGEC 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 834))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 841 Accesses

Abstract

With the rapid development of deep learning, a lot of CNN-based steganalyzers have emerged. This kind of steganalyzer uses statistical learning to investigate the properties caused by steganography, which is the most efficient approaches for breaking information hiding. However, we find a vulnerability of CNN-based steganalyzer that it can be defeated by dual operations. In this paper, we propose an easy yet effective algorithm to perturb the stego images against neural network, which can evade CNN-based steganalyzer with high probabilities. We elaborated on the theoretical basis of the method we proposed and proved the feasibility of this method through experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fridrich, J.: Steganography in Digital Media: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications [M]. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Filler, T., Judas, J., Fridrich, J.: Minimizing additive distortion in steganography using syndrome-trellis codes. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 6(3), 920–935 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holub, V., Fridrich, J.: Designing steganographic distortion using directional filters. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security, Binghamton, NY, USA, pp. 234–239 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holub, V., Fridrich, J., Denemark, T.: Universal distortion function for steganography in an arbitrary domain. EURASIP J. Inf. Secur. 2014(1), 1–13 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, B., Wang, M., Huang, J., Li, X.: A new cost function for spatial image steganography. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Paris, France, pp. 4206–4210 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sedighi, V., Cogranne, R., Fridrich, J.: Content-adaptive steganography by minimizing statistical detectability. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 11(2), 221–234 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fridrich, J., Kodovský, J.: Rich models for steganalysis of digital images. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 7(3), 868–882 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Qian, Y., Dong, J., Wang, W., Tan, T.: Deep learning for steganalysis via convolutional neural networks. Proc. SPIE 9409, 94090J (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., Haffner, P.: Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86(11), 2278–2324 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu, G., Wu, H.-Z., Shi, Y.Q.: Structural design of convolutional neural networks for steganalysis. IEEE Signal Process Lett. 23(5), 708–712 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ye, J., Ni, J., Yi, Y.: Deep learning hierarchical representations for image steganalysis. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 12(11), 2545–2557 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I.J., Fergus, R.: Intriguing properties of neural networks. ICLR (2014). arXiv:1312.6199

  13. Barreno, M., Nelson, B., Sears, R., Joseph, A.D., Tygar, J.D.: Can machine learning be secure? In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, pp. 16–25 (2006). ACM

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barreno, M., Nelson, B., Joseph, A.D., Tygar, J.: The security of machine learning. Mach. Learn. 81(2), 121–148 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Goodfellow, I.J., Shlens, J., Szegedy, C.: Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples (2014). arXiv:1412.6572

  16. Su, J., Vargas, D.V., Kouichi, S.: One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networks (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bas, P., Filler, T., Pevný, T.: Break our steganographic system: the ins and outs of organizing BOSS. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Hiding, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 59–70 (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (U1736213, U1536108, 61572308, 61103181, U1636206, 61373151, and 61525203), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (18ZR1427500), the Shanghai Dawn Scholar Plan (14SG36) and the Shanghai Excellent Academic Leader Plan (16XD1401200).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenxing Qian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Qian, Z., Huang, C., Wang, Z., Zhang, X. (2019). Breaking CNN-Based Steganalysis. In: Pan, JS., Lin, JW., Sui, B., Tseng, SP. (eds) Genetic and Evolutionary Computing. ICGEC 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 834. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5841-8_50

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics