Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wearable and Wireless Systems for Movement Disorder Evaluation and Deep Brain Stimulation Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wearable and Wireless Systems for Healthcare II

Part of the book series: Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation ((SSMI,volume 31))

Abstract

The implementation of wearable and wireless systems for deep brain stimulation offers the opportunity to substantially advance the treatment of progressive neurodegenerative movement disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease and Essential tremor. Deep brain stimulation offers an efficacious alternative regarding scenarios for which the intervention by medication has become intractable while avoiding the permanency of ablative neurosurgery. Even subsequent to the expert surgical application of the deep brain stimulation system, the acquisition of the optimal parameter configuration is inherently resource intensive and challenging in nature. With the advent of wearable and wireless systems, the response to therapy intervention for movement disorder status can be objectively quantified through the inertial sensor signal, such as an accelerometer and gyroscope. Furthermore, wireless connectivity to the Internet enables experimental and post-processing resources to be remotely situated effectively anywhere in the world. With machine learning amended to the post-processing capability, clinical diagnostic acuity is substantially advanced. Foundational subjects are elucidated, such a general perspective regarding Parkinson’s disease and Essential tremor, traditional ordinal methodologies for diagnosing severity, and the development of deep brain stimulation including surgical techniques for installation. The role of wearable and wireless systems, such as the smartphone, for quantifying the status of neurodegenerative movement disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease and Essential tremor, is presented. The utility of applying machine learning for augmenting diagnostic acuity of movement disorder status is addressed. The integration of wearable and wireless systems, such as the smartphone, with machine learning is discussed for the ability to distinctively classify between deep brain stimulation set to “On” and “Off” status for Parkinson’s disease and Essential tremor. The amalgamation of wearable and wireless systems with deep brain stimulation using machine learning as an augmented post-processing application implicate the evolutionary trends for the ability to achieve closed-loop optimization of parameter configurations with the development of Network Centric Therapy for a quantum leap in the treatment intervention for neurodegenerative movement disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease and Essential tremor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parkinson J (1817) An essay on the shaking palsy. Whittingham and Rowland, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Louis ED (2005) Essential tremor. Lancet Neurol 4(2):100–110

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Louis ED (2000) Essential tremor. Arch Neurol (JAMA Neurology) 57(10):1522–1524

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM (2000) Principles of neural science. McGraw-Hill, New York, Ch 43

    Google Scholar 

  5. Essential tremor: [http://www.essentialtremor.org/about-et/]

  6. Seeley RR, Stephens TD, Tate P (2003) Anatomy and physiology. McGraw-Hill, Boston, Ch 14

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deuschl G, Raethjen J, Hellriegel H, Elble R (2011) Treatment of patients with essential tremor. Lancet Neurol 10(2):148–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Habib-ur-Rehman (2000) Diagnosis and management of tremor. Arch Intern Med 160(16):2438–2444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. LeMoyne R (2013) Wearable and wireless accelerometer systems for monitoring Parkinson’s disease patients—a perspective review. Adv Park Dis 2(4):113–115

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nolte J, Sundsten JW (2002) The human brain: an introduction to its functional anatomy. Mosby, St. Louis, Ch 19

    Google Scholar 

  11. Williams R (2010) Alim-Louis Benabid: stimulation and serendipity. Lancet Neurol 9(12):1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Amon A, Alesch F (2017) Systems for deep brain stimulation: review of technical features. J Neural Transm 124(9):1083–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Isaias IU, Tagliati M (2008) Deep brain stimulation programming for movement disorders. In: Deep brain stimulation in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Springer, New York, pp 361–397

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Volkmann J, Moro E, Pahwa R (2006) Basic algorithms for the programming of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 21(S14):S284–S289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramaker C, Marinus J, Stiggelbout AM, Van Hilten BJ (2002) Systematic evaluation of rating scales for impairment and disability in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 17(5):867–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fahn S, Elton RL, UPDRS Program Members (1987) Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. In: Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease, Vol. 2. Macmillan Healthcare Information, Florham Park, pp 153–163, 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goetz CG, Stebbins GT, Chmura TA, Fahn S, Poewe W, Tanner CM (2010) Teaching program for the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale: (MDS-UPDRS). Mov Disord 25(9):1190–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Movement Disorder Society Task Force on Rating Scales for Parkinson’s Disease (2003) The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS): status and recommendations. Mov Disord 18(7):738–750

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, Stebbins GT, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stern MB, Dodel R, Dubois B, Holloway R, Jankovic J, Kulisevsky J, Lang AE, Lees A, Leurgans S, LeWitt PA, Nyenhuis D, Olanow CW, Rascol O, Schrag A, Teresi JA, van Hilten JJ, LaPelle N (2008) Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord 23(15):2129–2170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fahn S, Tolosa E, Marin C (1988) Clinical rating scale for tremor. In: Parkinson’s disease and movement disorders. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, pp 225–234

    Google Scholar 

  21. Elble RJ (2016) The essential tremor rating assessment scale. J Neurol Neuromed 1(4):34–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Siderowf A, McDermott M, Kieburtz K, Blindauer K, Plumb S, Shoulson I (2002) Test–retest reliability of the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale in patients with early Parkinson’s disease: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Mov Disord 17(4):758–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Metman LV, Myre B, Verwey N, Hassin-Baer S, Arzbaecher J, Sierens D, Bakay R (2004) Test–retest reliability of UPDRS-III, dyskinesia scales, and timed motor tests in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease: an argument against multiple baseline assessments. Mov Disord 19(9):1079–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Richards M, Marder K, Cote L, Mayeux R (1994) Interrater reliability of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale motor examination. Mov Disord 9(1):89–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Post B, Merkus MP, de Bie RM, de Haan RJ, Speelman JD (2005) Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale motor examination: are ratings of nurses, residents in neurology, and movement disorders specialists interchangeable? Mov Disord 20(12):1577–1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. LeMoyne R, Coroian C, Cozza M, Opalinski P, Mastroianni T, Grundfest W (2009) The merits of artificial proprioception, with applications in biofeedback gait rehabilitation concepts and movement disorder characterization. In: Biomedical engineering. InTech, Vienna, pp 165–198

    Google Scholar 

  27. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2018) Wearable and wireless systems for healthcare I: gait and reflex response quantification. Springer, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2017) Smartphone and portable media device: a novel pathway toward the diagnostic characterization of human movement. In: Smartphones from an applied research perspective. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  29. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2017) Wearable and wireless gait analysis platforms: smartphones and portable media devices. In: Wireless MEMS networks and applications. Elsevier, New York, pp 129–152

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2016) Telemedicine perspectives for wearable and wireless applications serving the domain of neurorehabilitation and movement disorder treatment. In: Telemedicine, SMGroup, Dover, Delaware, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  31. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2015) Use of smartphones and portable media devices for quantifying human movement characteristics of gait, tendon reflex response, and Parkinson’s disease hand tremor. In: Mobile health technologies, methods and protocols. Springer, New York, pp 335–358

    Google Scholar 

  32. LeMoyne R, Coroian C, Mastroianni T, Grundfest W (2008) Accelerometers for quantification of gait and movement disorders: a perspective review. J Mech Med Biol 8(2):137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Diamond MC, Scheibel AB, Elson LM (1985) The human brain coloring book. Harper Perennial, New York, Ch 5

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hariz GM, Lindberg M, Bergenheim AT (2002) Impact of thalamic deep brain stimulation on disability and health-related quality of life in patients with essential tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72(1):47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. LeMoyne R, Tomycz N, Mastroianni T, McCandless C, Cozza M, Peduto D (2015) Implementation of a smartphone wireless accelerometer platform for establishing deep brain stimulation treatment efficacy of essential tremor with machine learning. In: 37th Annual international conference of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), pp 6772–6775

    Google Scholar 

  36. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T, Tomycz N, Whiting D, Oh M, McCandless C, Currivan C, Peduto D (2017) Implementation of a multilayer perceptron neural network for classifying deep brain stimulation in ‘On’ and ‘Off’ modes through a smartphone representing a wearable and wireless sensor application. In: 47th Society for Neuroscience annual meeting (featured in Hot Topics; top 1% of abstracts)

    Google Scholar 

  37. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T, McCandless C, Currivan C, Whiting D, Tomycz N (2018) Implementation of a smartphone as a wearable and wireless accelerometer and gyroscope platform for ascertaining deep brain stimulation treatment efficacy of Parkinson’s disease through machine learning classification. Adv Park Dis 7(2):19–30

    Google Scholar 

  38. LeMoyne RC (2010) Wireless quantified reflex device. Ph.D. Dissertation UCLA

    Google Scholar 

  39. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T, Coroian C, Grundfest W (2011) Tendon reflex and strategies for quantification, with novel methods incorporating wireless accelerometer reflex quantification devices, a perspective review. J Mech Med Biol 11(3):471–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T, Kale H, Luna J, Stewart J, Elliot S, Bryan F, Coroian C, Grundfest W (2011) Fourth generation wireless reflex quantification system for acquiring tendon reflex response and latency. J Mech Med Biol 11(1):31–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. LeMoyne R, Coroian C, Mastroianni T, Grundfest W (2008) Quantified deep tendon reflex device for response and latency, third generation. J Mech Med Biol 8(4):491–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. LeMoyne R, Dabiri F, Jafari R (2008) Quantified deep tendon reflex device, second generation. J Mech Med Biol 8(1):75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. LeMoyne R, Dabiri F, Coroian C, Mastroianni T, Grundfest W (2007) Quantified deep tendon reflex device for assessing response and latency. In: 37th Society for Neuroscience annual meeting

    Google Scholar 

  44. LeMoyne R, Jafari R, Jea D (2005) Fully quantified evaluation of myotatic stretch reflex. In: 35th Society for Neuroscience annual meeting

    Google Scholar 

  45. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2017) Implementation of a smartphone wireless gyroscope platform with machine learning for classifying disparity of a hemiplegic patellar tendon reflex pair. J Mech Med Biol 17(6):1750083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. LeMoyne R, Kerr W, Zanjani K, Mastroianni T (2014) Implementation of an iPod wireless accelerometer application using machine learning to classify disparity of hemiplegic and healthy patellar tendon reflex pair. J Med Imaging Health Inform 4(1):21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2016) Smartphone wireless gyroscope platform for machine learning classification of hemiplegic patellar tendon reflex pair disparity through a multilayer perceptron neural network. In: Wireless Health (WH) of IEEE, pp 103–108

    Google Scholar 

  48. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2015) Machine learning classification of a hemiplegic and healthy patellar tendon reflex pair through an iPod wireless gyroscope platform. In: 45th Society for Neuroscience annual meeting

    Google Scholar 

  49. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T, Grundfest W, Nishikawa K (2013) Implementation of an iPhone wireless accelerometer application for the quantification of reflex response. In: 35th Annual international conference of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), pp 4658–4661

    Google Scholar 

  50. LeMoyne R, Coroian C, Mastroianni T (2009) Quantification of Parkinson’s disease characteristics using wireless accelerometers. In: ICME International conference on IEEE Complex Medical Engineering (CME), pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  51. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T, Cozza M, Coroian C, Grundfest W (2010) Implementation of an iPhone for characterizing Parkinson’s disease tremor through a wireless accelerometer application. In: 32nd Annual international conference of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), pp 4954–4958

    Google Scholar 

  52. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2016) Implementation of a multilayer perceptron neural network for classifying a hemiplegic and healthy reflex pair using an iPod wireless gyroscope platform. In: 46th Society for Neuroscience annual meeting

    Google Scholar 

  53. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T, Grundfest W (2013) Wireless accelerometer configuration for monitoring Parkinson’s disease hand tremor. Adv Park Dis 2(2):62–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. LeMoyne R, Coroian C, Mastroianni T, Grundfest W (2008) Virtual proprioception. J Mech Med Biol 8(3):317–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Benabid AL, Pollak P, Louveau A, Henry S, de Rougemont J (1987) Combined (thalamotomy and stimulation) stereotactic surgery of the VIM thalamic nucleus for bilateral Parkinson’s disease. Appl Neurophysiol 50(1–6):344–346

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rehncrona S, Johnels B, Widner H, Törnqvist AL, Hariz M, Sydow O (2003) Long-term efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation for tremor: double-blind assessments. Mov Disord 18(2):163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sydow O, Thobois S, Alesch F, Speelman JD (2003) Multicentre European study of thalamic stimulation in essential tremor: a six year follow up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74(10):1387–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Krack P, Batir A, Van Blercom N, Chabardes S, Fraix V, Ardouin C, Koudsie A, Limousin PD, Benazzouz A, LeBas JF, Benabid AL, Pollak P (2003) Five-year follow-up of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 349(20):1925–1934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Lyons KE, Koller WC, Wilkinson SB, Pahwa R (2001) Long term safety and efficacy of unilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus for parkinsonian tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71(5):682–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Benabid AL, Benazzous A, Pollak P (2002) Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation. Mov Disord 17(S3):S73–S74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Yu H, Neimat JS (2008) The treatment of movement disorders by deep brain stimulation. Neurotherapeutics 5(1):26–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Pretto T (2007) Deep brain stimulation. Neurologist 13(2):103–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Panisset M, Picillo M, Jodoin N, Poon YY, Valencia-Mizrachi A, Fasano A, Munhoz R, Honey CR (2017) Establishing a standard of care for deep brain stimulation centers in Canada. Can J Neurol Sci 44(2):132–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Schwalb JM, Hamani C (2008) The history and future of deep brain stimulation. Neurotherapeutics 5(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hariz M (2017) My 25 stimulating years with DBS in Parkinson’s disease. J Park Dis 7(s1):S33–S41

    Google Scholar 

  66. Fang JY, Tolleson C (2017) The role of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: an overview and update on new developments. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 13:723–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Sun FT, Morrell MJ (2014) Closed-loop neurostimulation: the clinical experience. Neurotherapeutics 11(3):553–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Priori A, Foffani G, Rossi L, Marceglia S (2013) Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) controlled by local field potential oscillations. Exp Neurol 245:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Okun MS (2012) Deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 367(16):1529–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Hariz MI (2002) Complications of deep brain stimulation surgery. Mov Disord 17(S3):S162–S166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Constantoyannis C, Berk C, Honey CR, Mendez I, Brownstone RM (2005) Reducing hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation. Can J Neurol Sci 32(2):194–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Patterson T, Stecker MM, Netherton BL (2007) Mechanisms of electrode induced injury. Part 2: clinical experience. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol 47(2):93–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Nutt JG, Anderson VC, Peacock JH, Hammerstad JP, Burchiel KJ (2001) DBS and diathermy interaction induces severe CNS damage. Neurology 56(10):1384–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Rezai AR, Phillips M, Baker KB, Sharan AD, Nyenhuis J, Tkach J, Henderson J, Shellock FG (2004) Neurostimulation system used for deep brain stimulation (DBS): MR safety issues and implications of failing to follow safety recommendations. Investig Radiol 39(5):300–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Tagliati M, Jankovic J, Pagan F, Susatia F, Isaias IU, Okun MS (2009) Safety of MRI in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation devices. NeuroImage 47(S2):T53–T57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Temel Y (2010) Limbic effects of high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. Vitam Horm 82:47–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Tomycz ND, Whiting DM (2018) Deep brain stimulation: indications, operative technique, and programming. Internal Publication Allegheny General Hospital

    Google Scholar 

  78. Saunders JB, Inman VT, Eberhart HD (1953) The major determinants in normal and pathological gait. J Bone Joint Surg 35A(3):543–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Culhane KM, O’Connor M, Lyons D, Lyons GM (2005) Accelerometers in rehabilitation medicine for older adults. Age Ageing 34(6):556–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Patel S, Park H, Bonato P, Chan L, Rodgers M (2012) A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 9(1):21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. LeMoyne R (2007) Gradient optimized neuromodulation for Parkinson’s disease. In: 12th Annual UCLA research conference on aging

    Google Scholar 

  82. LeMoyne R, Coroian C, Mastroianni T (2008) 3D wireless accelerometer characterization of Parkinson’s disease status. In: Plasticity and repair in neurodegenerative disorders (Conference)

    Google Scholar 

  83. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2018) Bluetooth inertial sensors for gait and reflex response quantification with perspectives regarding cloud computing and the Internet of Things. In: Wearable and wireless systems for healthcare I: gait and reflex response quantification. Springer, Singapore, pp 95–103

    Google Scholar 

  84. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T (2018) Role of machine learning for gait and reflex response classification. In: Wearable and wireless systems for healthcare I: gait and reflex response quantification. Springer, Singapore, pp 111–120

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  85. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T, Tomycz N, Whiting D, McCandless C, Peduto D, Cozza M (2015) I-Phone wireless accelerometer quantification of extremity tremor in essential tremor patient undergoing activated and inactivated deep brain stimulation. In: International Neuromodulation Society’s 12th World Congress

    Google Scholar 

  86. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 11(1):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Witten IH, Frank E, Hall MA (2011) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  88. WEKA [http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/~ml/weka/]

  89. LeMoyne R, Kerr W, Mastroianni T, Hessel A (2014) Implementation of machine learning for classifying hemiplegic gait disparity through use of a force plate. In: 13th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), IEEE, pp 379–382

    Google Scholar 

  90. LeMoyne R, Mastroianni T, McCandless C, Currivan C, Whiting D, Tomycz N (2018) Implementation of a smartphone as a wearable and wireless inertial sensor platform for determining efficacy of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease tremor through machine learning. In: 48th Society for Neuroscience annual meeting (Nanosymposium)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences and Center for Bioengineering Innovation, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA

    Robert LeMoyne

  2. Independent, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Timothy Mastroianni

  3. Department of Neurosurgery Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Neuroscience Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Donald Whiting & Nestor Tomycz

Authors
  1. Robert LeMoyne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Timothy Mastroianni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Donald Whiting
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nestor Tomycz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

LeMoyne, R., Mastroianni, T., Whiting, D., Tomycz, N. (2019). Wearable and Wireless Systems for Movement Disorder Evaluation and Deep Brain Stimulation Systems. In: Wearable and Wireless Systems for Healthcare II. Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation, vol 31. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5808-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5808-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5807-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5808-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation