Skip to main content

A Deep Learning-Based Stacked Generalization Method to Design Smart Healthcare Solution

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 545))

Abstract

Healthcare or health insurance agencies have been in a continuous state of change, especially during the present technology expansion. They are beneath colossal pressure to forecast customer health issue and to generate surplus premium holders which will simultaneously reduce the cost. Examining and utilizing the vast data available are critical for healthcare companies in designing various strategies in the future. Many such healthcare organizations have already moved toward data mining and analytics with data warehouse methodologies and business intelligence with statistical analysis. However, further adaptation is required, as they must use different data from new sources in a blend with the prior sources. To consider this adaptation, predictive analysis technique is proposed. Predictive analysis comprises diverse statistical methods from predictive modeling, machine learning, and data mining that analyze present and past realities to make predictions about future. There are several advantages of using descriptive and predictive analytics in healthcare domain for concrete decision making of cost-effective solutions to their customers. This paper expands upon risk mitigation tactics to foresee high-risk patients. This is done by considering clinical data that is an electronic medical record and evaluating risk associated using stacked ensemble machine learning techniques. This technique helps achieve higher predictive accuracy of 90.17% and specificity of 94.90% in identifying high-risk patients from a lesser amount of data. It has been centered on payer analytics and customer analytics in light of novel machine learning algorithm to give full-cycle knowledge toward cost reduction and improvement in nature of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.embrots.com.

References

  1. Cucciare MA, O’Donohue W (2006) Predicting future healthcare costs: how well does risk-adjustment work? J Health Organ Manag 20(2):150–162. pMID:16869351

    Google Scholar 

  2. Medicaid. A small share of enrollees consistently accounted for a large share of expenditures, no. 15-460. United States Government Accountability Office

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pandey S, Supriya M, Shrivastava A (2017) Data classification using machine learning Approach. In: Thampi S, Mitra S, Mukhopadhyay J, Li KC, James A, Berretti S (eds) Intelligent systems technologies and applications, ISTA 2017. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 683. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sheeran M, Steele R (2017) A framework for big data technology in health and healthcare. In: 2017 IEEE 8th annual ubiquitous computing, electronics and mobile communication conference (UEMCON)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nambiar R, Bhardwaj R, Sethi A, Vargheese R (2013) A look at challenges and opportunities of big data analytics in health care. In: International conference on big data 2013. IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2013.6691753

  6. Yoo I, Alafaireet P, Marinov M, Pena-Hernandez K, Gopidi R, Chang J-F, Hua L (2012) Data mining in healthcare and biomedicine: a survey of the literature. J Med Syst 36(4):2431–2448

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harper PR (2005) A review and comparison of classification algorithms for medical decision making. Health Policy 71(3):315–331

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hachesu PR, Ahmadi M, Alizadeh S, Sadoughi F (2013) Use of data mining techniques to determine and predict length of stay of cardiac patients. Healthc Inform Res 19(2):121–129

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hasan O, Meltzer DO, Shaykevich SA, Bell CM, Kaboli PJ, Auerbach AD, Wetterneck TB, Arora VM, Zhang J, Schnipper JL (2010) Hospital readmission in general medicine patients: a prediction model. J Gen Intern Med 25(3):211–219

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dominic V, Gupta D, Khare S (2015) An effective performance analysis of machine learning techniques for cardiovascular disease. Appl Med Inform 36:23

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kartchner D, Merrill A, Wrathall J (2017) Cost reduction via patient targeting and outreach: a statistical approach. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICHI.2017.86

  12. Reardon S (2015) Preventable readmissions cost CMS $17 billion. http://bit.ly/1nL8k7g. Accessed 12 Feb 2018

  13. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA (2009) Rehospitalizations among patients in the medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med 360(14):1418–1428

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sushmita S, Khulbe G, Hasan A, Newman S, Ravindra P, Roy SB, De Cock M, Teredesai A (2016) Predicting 30-day risk and cost of “all-cause” hospital readmissions”. In: Workshops at the thirtieth AAAI conference on AI, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  15. List of ICD-9 Codes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ICD9_codes. Accessed 12 Mar 2018

  16. Charlson M (2018) Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). https://www.mdcalc.co/charlson-comorbidity-index-cci. Accessed 24 Mar 2018

  17. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. https://www.cms.gov/. Accessed 13 Mar 2018

  18. Wolpert DH (1992) Stacked generalization. Neural Netw 5(2):241–259

    Google Scholar 

  19. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn, 45(1):5–32

    Google Scholar 

  20. Friedman JH (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat:1189–1232

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 2016, pp 785–794

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ting SL, Ip WH, Tsang AHC (2011) Is Naïve Bayes a good classifier for document classification? Int J Softw Eng Its Appl 5(3)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Guisan A, Edwards TC Jr, Hastie T (2002) Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecol Model 157:89–100

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravindran Nambiar Jyothi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nambiar Jyothi, R., Prakash, G. (2019). A Deep Learning-Based Stacked Generalization Method to Design Smart Healthcare Solution. In: Sridhar, V., Padma, M., Rao, K. (eds) Emerging Research in Electronics, Computer Science and Technology. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 545. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5802-9_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5802-9_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5801-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5802-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics