Surgical Technique for Baerveldt Glaucoma Devices

Jutley G, Luk S, Dehabadi M, Cordeiro MF. Management of glaucoma as a neurodegenerative disease. Neurodegen Dis Manag. 2017;7(2):157–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd MA, Baerveldt G, Fellenbaum PS, et al. Intermediate-term results of a randomized clinical trial of the 350 versus the 500 mm2 Baerveldt implant. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1456–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christakis PG, Kalenak JW, Zurakowski D, et al. The Ahmed Versus Baerveldt Study. Design, baseline characteristics, and intraoperative complications. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2172–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christakis PG, Tsai JC, Zurakowski D, et al. The Ahmed Versus Baerveldt Study. One-year treatment outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2180–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton K, Gedde SJ, Budenz DL, et al. The Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study: methodology, baseline patient characteristics, and intraoperative complications. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:435–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton K, Feuer WJ, Budenz DL, et al. Three-year outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison (ABC) Study. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(8):1547–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budenz DL, Barton K, Feuer WJ, et al. Treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study after one year of follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:443–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christakis PG, Tsai JC, Kalenak JW, et al. The Ahmed Versus Baerveldt Study. Three-year treatment outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:2232–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trible JR, Brown DB. Occlusive ligature and standardized fenestrations of a Baerveldt tube with and without antimetabolites for early postoperative intraocular pressure control. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:2243–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prata JA Jr, Mermoud A, LaBree L, et al. In vitro and in vivo flow characteristics of glaucoma drainage implants. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(6):894–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al. Three-year follow-up of the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:670–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al. Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) Study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:789–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gedde S. Treatment outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (PTVT) study after 1 year of follow-up. Presented at: American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting; Oct. 14–18, 2016; Chicago.Google Scholar

Lim S. Postoperative complications in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (PTVT) study during the first year of follow-up. Presented at: American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting; Oct. 14–18, 2016; Chicago.Google Scholar

Sherwood MB, Smith MF, Driebe WT Jr, et al. Drainage tube implants in the treatment of glaucoma following penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1993;24(3):185–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Jutley G, Yang E, Bloom PA. Surgical management of raised intra-ocular tension in the hostile ocular surface: recurrent tube erosion in a patient with systemic sclerosis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(Suppl 1):222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarbak AAA, Shahwan SA, Jadaan IA, et al. Endophthalmitis associated with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:454–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar