Abstract
Let \(k\ge 0\) and \(n,\, r\ge 1\) be natural numbers, and let \(\zeta = \mathrm{e}^{\pi \mathrm{i}/2^k}\). Suppose that \(f : S({\mathbb C}^n) \rightarrow {\mathbb R}^{2r}\) is a continuous map on the unit sphere in \({\mathbb C}^n\) such that, for each \(v\in S({\mathbb C}^n)\), \(f(\zeta v)= - f(v)\). A connective K-theory Borsuk–Ulam theorem is used to show that, if \(n> 2^kr\), then the covering dimension of the space of vectors \(v\in S({\mathbb C}^n)\) such that \(f(v)=0\) is at least \(2(n-2^kr-1)\). It is shown, further, that there exists such a map f for which this zero-set has covering dimension equal to \(2(n-2^kr-1) + 2^{k+2}k+1\).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Z. Blaszczyk, W. Marzantowicz, M. Singh, General Bourgin-Yang theorems. Topol. Appl. 249, 112–126 (2018)
M.C. Crabb, Periodicity in \(\mathbb{Z}/4\)-equivariant stable homotopy theory. Contemporary Math. 96, 109–124 (1989)
M.C. Crabb, J. Jaworowski, Aspects of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 13, 459–488 (2013)
S. Deo, T.B. Singh, On the converse of some theorems about orbit spaces. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 25, 162–170 (1982)
M. Furuta, Y. Kametani, H. Matsue, N. Minami, Homotopy theoretical considerations of the Bauer-Furuta stable homotopy Seiberg-Witten invariants. Geom. Topol. Monogr. 10, 155–166 (2007)
H.J. Munkholm, On the Borsuk-Ulam theorem for \(\mathbb{Z}_{p^a}\) -actions on \(S^{2n-1}\) and maps \(S^{2n-1} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^m\). Osaka J. Math. 7, 451–456 (1970)
S. Stolz, The level of real projective spaces. Comment. Math. Helv. 64, 661–674 (1989)
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Prof. Mahender Singh for discussions on some of the material in Sect. 5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Proof of Proposition 2.9. Embedding Y as a retract of an open subspace \(W\subseteq E\) of some Euclidean space E by \(i: Y\hookrightarrow W\), \(r : W\rightarrow Y\), we treat Y as a subspace of W. There is some \(\epsilon >0\) such that the open ball \(B_\epsilon (y)\) of radius \(\epsilon \) is contained in W for all \(y\in Y\).
By the hypothesis on the covering dimension, there exist a finite open cover \((U_i)_{i\in I}\) of Z and points \(x_i\in U_i\) such that \(f(U_i) \subseteq B_{\epsilon }(f(x_i))\) for all \(i\in I\) and \(\#\{ i\in I \mid x\in U_i\} \le d+1\) for each \(x\in Z\).
Then we may choose a partition of unity \((\varphi _i)_{i\in I}\) subordinate to the cover and define C to be the simplicial complex
of dimension at most d.
Given \(x\in Z\), let \(J=\{ i\in I \mid x\in U_i\}\). Then \(f(x) \in B_{\epsilon }(f(x_i))\) for all \(i\in J\) and \(\varphi _i(x)=0\) if \(i\notin J\). So \(f(x_i)\in B_\epsilon (f(x))\) for all \(i\in J\). Since the ball is convex, for \(0\le t\le 1\), we have \((1-t)f(x) + t\sum _i \varphi _i(x)f(x_i)\in B_\epsilon (f(x)) \subseteq W\).
So we may define a homotopy \(f_t : Z\rightarrow Y\), \(0\le t\le 1\), by
Now \(f_0=f\) and \(f_1\) given by \(f_1(x) =r(\sum _i \varphi _i(x)f(x_i))\) factors through the map
and
Indeed, given \((s_i)\) we can choose \(x\in \bigcap _{i : s_i>0} U_i\), and then \(f(x_i) \in B_\epsilon (f(x))\) if \(s_i >0\). Thus we have constructed the required factorization up to homotopy. \(\square \)
Proof of Proposition 2.11. Suppose that \(\mathcal {U}\) is an open cover of \(\tilde{Z}\). It is straightforward to check that, for each point \(x\in \tilde{Z}\), with stabilizer \(G_x\le G\), there is an open \(G_x\)-invariant neighbourhood \(U_x\) of x such that (i) for each \(g\in G\) the translate \(gU_x\) is contained in some set of the cover \(\mathcal {U}\) and (ii) for distinct cosets \(gG_x,\, hG_x\in G/G_x\), the translates \(gU_x\) and \(hU_x\) are disjoint.
Write \(\pi : \tilde{Z} \rightarrow Z\) for the projection. Then the open sets \(\pi (U_x)\), (\(x\in \tilde{Z}\)), cover Z. By assumption, there is a finite open refinement \(\mathcal {V}\) of the cover \((\pi (U_x))\) such that each point of Z lies in at most \(d+1\) sets in \(\mathcal {V}\).
For each \(V\in \mathcal {V}\), choose an element \(x_V\in \tilde{Z}\) such that \(V\subseteq \pi (U_{x_V})\). The subsets \(\pi ^{-1}(V)\cap gU_{x_V}\), \(V\in \mathcal {V}\), \(gG_x\in G/G_x\), constitute a finite open refinement of \(\mathcal {U}\) with the property that each point of \(\tilde{Z}\) lies in at most \(d+1\) sets of the cover. \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Crabb, M.C. (2019). Connective K-Theory and the Borsuk–Ulam Theorem. In: Singh, M., Song, Y., Wu, J. (eds) Algebraic Topology and Related Topics. Trends in Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5742-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5742-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5741-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5742-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)