Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Epilogue

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Bayesian Claims Reserving Methods in Non-life Insurance with Stan

  • 603 Accesses

Abstract

In this final chapter, we summarize the three proposed Bayesian claims reserving models and suggest a Bayesian modelling procedure for use when facing a real problem. Finally, other considerations with respect to Bayesian methodology and actuarial applications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, M., & Niemeyer, A. (2014). The fundamental definition of the solvency capital requirement in Solvency II. ASTIN Bulletin, 44, 501–533.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Genest, C., Rémillard, B., & Beaudoin, D. (2009). Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: A review and a power study. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44, 199–213.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Joe, H. (2014). Dependence modeling with copulas. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lunn, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N., & Spiegelhalter, D. (2000). WinBUGS—A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing, 10, 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minka, T. P. (2001). Expectation propagation for approximate Bayesian inference. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 362–369). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saluz, A. (2015). Prediction uncertainties in the Cape Cod reserving method. Annals of Actuarial Science, 9, 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saluz, A., Gisler, A., & Wüthrich, M. V. (2011). Development pattern and prediction error for the stochastic Bornhuetter-Ferguson claims reserving method. ASTIN Bulletin, 41, 279–313.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, L., & McCourt, P. (2012). Worksafe Victoria actuarial valuation of outstanding claims liability for the scheme as at 30 June 2012, Technical report. PricewaterhouseCoopers Actuarial Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Statistics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China

    Guangyuan Gao

Authors
  1. Guangyuan Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangyuan Gao .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gao, G. (2018). Epilogue. In: Bayesian Claims Reserving Methods in Non-life Insurance with Stan. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3609-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation