Abstracts
The Bocciardi approach for RALP passes through the Douglas space, following a completely intrafascial plane without any dissection of the anterior compartment, which contains neurovascular bundles, Aphrodite’s veil, endopelvic fascia, the Santorini plexus, pubourethral ligaments, and all of the structures throught to play a role in maintenance of continence and potency. In the era of Robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) including various techniques of anterior suspension and posterior reconstruction. Most of these techniques aim to restore the normal anatomy so that functional outcomes can be optimized. Nearly all published techniques to date have involved dropping the bladder and entering the Retzius space at some point during RALP. Galfano et al. reported they performed a novel Retzius-sparing RALP in three out of five patients in 2010. Since introducing this technique, we have applied this technique on prostatectomy more than 800 cases. Our Retzius-sparing RALP technique is similar to that described by Galfano et al. but there are some modified technique compare to Galfano’s.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, Lobontiu A, Saint F, Cicco A, Antiphon P, Chopin D. Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case. Prog Urol. 2000;10(4):520–3.
Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001;87(4):408–10.
Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, Bocciardi AM. A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol. 2010;58(3):457–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.008.
Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, Strada E, Petralia G, Bramerio M, Ascione A, Gambacorta M, Bocciardi AM. Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with >/= 1 year of follow-up. Eur Urol. 2013;64(6):974–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.046.
Hurtes X, Roupret M, Vaessen C, Pereira H, Faivre d'Arcier B, Cormier L, Bruyere F. Anterior suspension combined with posterior reconstruction during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy improves early return of urinary continence: a prospective randomized multicentre trial. BJU Int. 2012;110(6):875–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10849.x.
Jeong W, Araki M, Park SY, Lee YH, Kumon H, Hong SJ, Rha KH. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the Asian population: modified port configuration and ultradissection. Int J Urol. 2010;17(3):297–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02480.x.
Lim SK, Kim KH, Shin TY, Han WK, Chung BH, Hong SJ, Choi YD, Rha KH. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: combining the best of retropubic and perineal approaches. BJU Int. 2014;114(2):236–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12705.
Menon M, Shrivastava A, Bhandari M, Satyanarayana R, Siva S, Agarwal PK. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009. Eur Urol. 2009;56(1):89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.032.
Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J, Team VIP. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique. J Urol. 2003;169(6):2289–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000067464.53313.dd.
Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B. Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol. 2009;56(3):472–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.007.
Potdevin L, Ercolani M, Jeong J, Kim IY. Functional and oncologic outcomes comparing interfascial and intrafascial nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. J Endourol. 2009;23(9):1479–84. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0369.
Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S, Santoro L, Bozzola A, Galli S, Knez R, Scieri F, Scaburri A, Gaboardi F. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(4):996–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.014.
Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn LC, Neuhaus J, Constantinides C, Liatsikos EN. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):629–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.012.
Williams SB, Alemozaffar M, Lei Y, Hevelone N, Lipsitz SR, Plaster BA, Hu JC. Randomized controlled trial of barbed polyglyconate versus polyglactin suture for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy anastomosis: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2010;58(6):875–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.07.021.
Acknowledgement
This research was supported by the Korean ministry of science and ICT to the Human plus fusion research and development challenge project in 2018 (NRF-2018M3C1B8017157).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chang, K.D., Oh, C.K., Rha, K.H. (2019). Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. In: Chan, Ey., Matsuda, T. (eds) Endourology Progress. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3465-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3465-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3464-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3465-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)