Skip to main content

Assessment of the Vulnerability of Emergency Rescue System in Coal Enterprises Based on GGAHP

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Proceeding of the 24th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2018
  • 880 Accesses

Abstract

To identify the weak links of the emergency rescue system in coal enterprises, this study assessed the vulnerability of this system with the Group Gray Analytical Hierarchy Process (GGAHP), which combined the Group Decision Making and Grey Theory. By setting up the index system about vulnerability and judgment matrix, then whitening the matrix, the vulnerability data at the bottom of the index system could be calculated to spot the weak links of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Y. Shang, Review on concept model of disaster vulnerability. J. Catastrophology 28(1), 112–116 (2013). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.A. Janssen, M.L. Schoon, W. Ke, Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Glob. Environ. Change 16(3), 240–252 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Z. Feng, J. Hao, Assessment on emergency rescue capacity of coal mine accident. J. UESTC ( Soc. Sci. Ed.) 12(3), 53–65 (2010). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Xu, Principles of Analytic Hierarchy Process (Tianjin University Press, Tianjin, 1988), pp. 6–10. (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Tang, X. Li, Study on method for assessment of vulnerability of railway emergency rescue system. J. China Railw. Soc. 35(7), 14–20 (2013). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Cheng, S. Song, Research on vulnerability of Beijing subway based on GGAHP. Urban Rapid Rail Transit 28(3), 29–33 (2015). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Xu, H. Tian, Vulnerability assessment of emergency management system in coal enterprises. Saf. Coal Mines 47(12), 219–221 (2016). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Yang, L. Wang, Assessment index system of coal mine emergency rescue ability based on interpretative structural modeling method. J. China Univ. Min. & Technol. ( Soc. Sci.) 17(1), 55–61 (2015). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Shan, C. Wang, X. Chen, Research on emergency rescue capability of coal mine based on vague set theory. Coal Technol. 35(2), 320–321 (2016). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Xie, S. Liu, Grey analytic hierarchy process and its position-solving. J. South. Yangtze Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 3(1), 87–89 (2004). (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Fund for Scientific Research Training of Xi’an University of Science and Technology (No. 6310214027).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tian-bo Xu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Xu, Tb. (2019). Assessment of the Vulnerability of Emergency Rescue System in Coal Enterprises Based on GGAHP. In: Huang, G., Chien, CF., Dou, R. (eds) Proceeding of the 24th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2018. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3402-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics