Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for the Spine

  • Dhritiman Chakrabarti
  • Deepti Srinivas


Intraoperative neuromonitoring is an essential modality for ensuring safety of neurosurgical procedures of the spinal cord. Many techniques have come into regular clinical use within the last decade, and their utility recognized as guideline recommendations. This chapter will provide a broad overview of the common electrophysiological monitoring methods of the spinal cord including somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, spontaneous electromyography, and pedicle screw monitoring.


Neuromonitoring Evoked potentials Somatosensory Motor Spontaneous electromyography Pedicle screw 


  1. 1.
    Møller AR. Introduction. In: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Møller AR. Monitoring somatosensory evoked potentials. In: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Møller AR. Anatomy and physiology of sensory systems. In: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 57–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson LG, Kanim LE, Sherman JE. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;96:6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hilibrand AS, Schwartz DM, Sethuraman V, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ. Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86–A:1248–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hadley MN, Shank CD, Rozzelle CJ, Walters BC. Guidelines for the use of electrophysiological monitoring for surgery of the human spinal column and spinal cord. Neurosurgery. 2017;81:713–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mehta AI, Mohrhaus CA, Husain AM, Karikari IO, Hughes B, Hodges T, Gottfried O, Bagley CA. Dorsal column mapping for intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection decreases dorsal column dysfunction. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25:205–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taniguchi M, Cedzich C, Schramm J. Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description. Neurosurgery. 1993;32:219–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Møller AR. Anatomy and physiology of motor systems. In: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 169–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shigematsu H, Kawaguchi M, Hayashi H, et al. Higher success rate with transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potentials using constant-voltage stimulation compared with constant-current stimulation in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Spine J. 2017;17:1472–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Møller AR. Practical aspects of monitoring spinal motor systems. In: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 207–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Legatt AD, Emerson RG, Epstein CM, MacDonald DB, Deletis V, Bravo RJ, López JR. ACNS Guideline. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;33:42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee JJ, Il KY, Hong JT, Sung JH, Lee SW, Yang SH. Intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials for supratentorial tumor surgery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014;56:98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen R, Cros D, Curra A, et al. The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:504–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Péréon Y, Tich SNT, Delécrin J, Dang CP, Bodin J, Drouet JC, Passuti N. Combined spinal cord monitoring using neurogenic mixed evoked potentials and collision techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(14):1571–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sloan TB, Erian R. Effect of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade on cortical motor evoked potentials. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:966–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim S-H, Jin S-J, Karm M-H, Moon Y-J, Jeong H-W, Kim J-W, Ha S-I, Kim J-U. Comparison of false-negative/positive results of intraoperative evoked potential monitoring between no and partial neuromuscular blockade in patients receiving propofol/remifentanil-based anesthesia during cerebral aneurysm clipping surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e4725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Journée HL, Berends HI, Kruyt MC. The percentage of amplitude decrease warning criteria for Transcranial MEP monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;34:22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    MacDonald DB. Overview on criteria for MEP monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;34:4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park J-H, Hyun S-J. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3:765–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lall RR, Lall RR, Hauptman JS, Munoz C, Cybulski GR, Koski T, Ganju A, Fessler RG, Smith ZA. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: indications, efficacy, and role of the preoperative checklist. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33:E10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Calancie B, Lebwohl N, Madsen P, Klose KJ. Intraoperative evoked EMG monitoring in an animal model. A new technique for evaluating pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992;17:1229–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Raynor BL, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Taylor BA, Padberg AM. Correlation between low triggered electromyographic thresholds and lumbar pedicle screw malposition. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:2673–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bosnjak R, Dolenc VV. Electrical thresholds for biomechanical response in the ankle to direct stimulation of spinal roots L4, L5, and S1. Implications for intraoperative pedicle screw testing. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:703–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Parker SL, Amin AG, Farber SH, McGirt MJ, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky J-P, Bydon A, Gokaslan ZL, Witham TF. Ability of electromyographic monitoring to determine the presence of malpositioned pedicle screws in the lumbosacral spine: analysis of 2450 consecutively placed screws. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15:130–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dhritiman Chakrabarti
    • 1
  • Deepti Srinivas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Neurocritical CareNational Institute of Mental Health and Neuro SciencesBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations