Abstract
The research quality and productivity of a research area are decided by the number of research articles and citations. Several factors affect the citation count of a research article. The objective of this paper is to find the influences of social media and abstract views in the increase of citations. The relationship between social media influence and abstract count on the overall citations is evaluated on the top cited research articles of cloud computing area. More research focus is needed to analyze the social media influence score. The research scholars, research organizations, funding agencies, and various communities can increase their research productivity and research impact through this analysis.
Please note that the LNCS editorial assumes that all authors have used the western naming convention, with given names preceding surnames. This determines the structure of the names in the running heads and the author index.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
M.E.J. Newman, Networks: an introduction, 23(01) (2014)
A.L. Kinney, National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104(46), 17943–17947 (2007)
H.F. Moed, A critical comparative analysis of five world university rankings. Scientometrics 110(2), 967–990 (2017)
J.E. Hirsch, An index to quantify an individual’s s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102(46), 16569–16572 (2005)
I.M. Verma, Impact, not impact factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112(26), 7875–7876 (2015)
E. Garfield, The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 295(1), 90–93 (2006)
L. Bornmann, H. Daniel, What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. J. Doc. 64(1), 45–80 (2008)
L. Bornmann, G. Wallon, A. Ledin, Does the committee peer review select the best applicants for funding? An investigation of the selection process for two European molecular biology organization programmes. PLoS ONE, 3(10) (2008)
G. Madaan, S. Jolad, Evolution of scientific collaboration networks, in Proceeding—2014 IEEE International Conference Big Data, IEEE Big Data 2014, pp. 7–13, (2015)
Z. Xie, Z. Ouyang, Q. Liu, J. Li, A geometric graph model for citation networks of exponentially growing scientific papers. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 456, 167–175 (2016)
D. Wang, C. Song, A.-L. Barabasi, Quantifying long-term scientific impact, Science (80-.) 342(6154), pp. 127–132 (2013)
S. Redner, “How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. Eur. Phys. J. B—Condens. Matter Complex Syst., 4(2), 131–134 (1998)
T.A. Brooks, Evidence of complex citer motivations. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 37(1), 34–36 (1986)
S. Zhang, D. Zhao, R. Cheng, J. Cheng, H. Wang, Finding Influential Papers in Citation Networks, in 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace, pp. 658–662 (2016)
Y. Jia L. Qu, Improve the Performance of link prediction methods in citation network by using H-Index, in 2016 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing Knowledge Discovery, pp. 220–223 (2016)
L. Floridi, Big data and their epistemological challenge. Philos. Technol. 25(4), 435–437 (2012)
C. Caragea, J. Wu, K. Williams, S. Das, G.M. Khabsa, P. Teregowda, C.L. Giles, Automatic identification of research articles from crawled documents (2014)
Y. Lin, H. Tong, J. Tang, K. Selc, Guest editorial: big scholar data discovery and collaboration. IEEE Trans. Big Data 2(1), 1–2 (2016)
F. Xia, W. Wang, T.M. Bekele, H. Liu, Big scholarly data: a survey. IEEE Trans. Big Data 3(1), 18–35 (2017)
M.W. Nielsen, Gender and citation impact in management research. J. Informetr. 11(4), 1213–1228 (2017)
H.J. Kim, Y.K. Jeong, M. Song, Content- and proximity-based author co-citation analysis using citation sentences. J. Informetr. 10(4), 954–966 (2016)
D. Fiala, G. Tutoky, PageRank-based prediction of award-winning researchers and the impact of citations. J. Informetr. 11(4), 1044–1068 (2017)
L. Bornmann, L. Leydesdorff, Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: a large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data. J. Informetr. 11(1), 164–175 (2017)
J. Guan, Y. Yan, J.J. Zhang, The impact of collaboration and knowledge networks on citations. J. Informetr. 11(2), 407–422 (2017)
G.S. Patience, C.A. Patience, B. Blais, F. Bertrand, Citation analysis of scientific categories. Heliyon 3(5) (2017)
N. Wang, H. Liang, Y. Jia, S. Ge, Y. Xue, Z. Wang, Cloud computing research in the IS discipline: A citation/co-citation analysis. Decis. Support Syst. 86, 35–47 (2016)
J. Son, S.B. Kim, Academic paper recommender system using multilevel simultaneous citation networks. Decis. Support Syst. 105, 24–33 (2018)
J.M. Lindsay, PlumX from plum analytics: not just altmetrics. J. Electron. Resour. Med. Libr. 13(1), 8–17 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nivash, J.P., Dhinesh Babu, L.D. (2019). An Empirical Analysis of Big Scholarly Data to Find the Increase in Citations. In: Satapathy, S., Bhateja, V., Somanah, R., Yang, XS., Senkerik, R. (eds) Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 862. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3329-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3329-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3328-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3329-3
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)