Skip to main content

A Functional Requirements Development and Management Approach Applied to a Civil Aircraft Program

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Proceedings of the 2018 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology (APISAT 2018) (APISAT 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 459))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The functions and requirements play an extremely important role in developing complex systems, providing a framework so that all engineers involved in a project have a common understanding of the scope and characterization of the system. Meanwhile, the functions and requirements are used to specify the system itself, as well as relevant auxiliary products and services which the stakeholders expect and desire. In this paper, a functional requirements development and management approach applied in a civil aircraft program is introduced. The operational scenario/use case definition, functional analysis, functional requirements and interfaces capture processes for a civil aircraft are presented in detail. In particular, the model-based functional analysis process and method are presented. The aircraft functional requirements hierarchy is studied and defined, taking account of the aircraft product breakdown, organization, and statement of work in order to define the requirements topology and traceability relationships. A typical aircraft functional requirements development case is taken to illustrate the functional requirements development method. Furthermore, a requirements management process is depicted throughout the aircraft program life cycle including requirements identification, validation, allocation, verification, and change control activities. A requirements management platform is developed according to the requirements management process. It shows that it is effective to perform functional requirements development based on aircraft operational scenarios (Use Cases) and aircraft program stakeholders’ needs, to improve the completeness of requirements and to ensure engineers’ common awareness of the aircraft to be developed. Furthermore, it’s necessary to perform a common requirements management process throughout the whole aircraft life cycle to ensure that the requirements can be properly validated, satisfied, implemented and verified so that stakeholders’ needs and expectations are met and that aircraft development, operation, and commercial success can be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schaad RG, Hopper JM (1993) The customer influence in 777 design. In: AIAA 93-1139, AIAA/AHS/ASEE Aerospace design conference, Irvine, CA, February 1993

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vigneron Y (2003) Commercial aircraft for the 21st century A380 and beyond. In: AIAA 2003-2886, AIAA/ICAS international air & space symposium and exposition, Dayton, OH, July 2003

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cummings TK (2007) Lessons learned from 737 & 787 jet liner programs. In: AIAA 2007-6125, AIAA SPACE 2007 conference & exposition, Long Beach, California, September 2007

    Google Scholar 

  4. Loren JR (1992) Design for global competition – The Boeing 777. In: AIAA 92-4190, AIAA aircraft design systems meeting, Hilton Head, SC, August 1992

    Google Scholar 

  5. Altfeld HH, Tang CH (2013) Commercial aircraft projects – managing the development of highly complex products. Aviation Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  6. Raghunathan S, Curran R, Kundu A, Price M, Benard E (2003) Research into integrated aircraft technologies. In: AIAA 2003-6736, AIAA’s 3rd annual aviation technology, integration, and operations (ATIO) Tech, Denver, Colorado, November 2003

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson S (2015) Systems engineering for comercial aircraft – a domain-specific adaptation. University of Southern California and Burnham Systems Consulting, Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  8. Petersen TJ, Sutcliffe PL (1992) Systems engineering as applied to the Boeing 777. In: AIAA 92-1010, AIAA Aerospace design conference, Irvine, CA, February 1992

    Google Scholar 

  9. SAE ARP 4754A Guidelines for development of civil aircraft and systems (2010). Society of Automotive Engineers, December 2010

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buus H, McLees R, Orgun M, Pasztor E, Schultz L (1997) 777 flight control validation. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 33:656–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cencetti M, Maggiore P (2013) System modeling framework and MDO tool integration: MBSE methodologies applied to design and analysis of space system. In: AIAA modeling and simulation technologies (MST) conference

    Google Scholar 

  12. Estefan JA (2008) Survey of model-based systems engineering (MBSE) methodologies Rev. B. INCOSE MBSE Initiative, May 2008

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fuchs J (2012) Multi-disciplinary MBSE approach in industrial phases. In: Infotech@Aerospace 2012, AIAA 2012-2532

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cole BJ, Jenkins S (2015) Connecting requirements to architecture and analysis via model-based systems engineering. In: AIAA Infotech@Aerospace 2015

    Google Scholar 

  15. Systems Modeling Language (2018) SysML. www.sysml.org. Accessed Feb 2018

  16. Williams JH (2006) NAS system engineering manual (version 3.1). Federal Aviation Administration, October 2006

    Google Scholar 

  17. He DF, Zhao YR, Qian ZY (2016) COMAC systems engineering manual. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, Shanghai

    Google Scholar 

  18. Eshelman D, Klafter M (2004) Activity diagrams - a requirements distribution process for test equipment development. In: IEEE AUTOTESTCON

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haomin Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, H., Zhang, X., Tang, C., Zhan, C. (2019). A Functional Requirements Development and Management Approach Applied to a Civil Aircraft Program. In: Zhang, X. (eds) The Proceedings of the 2018 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology (APISAT 2018). APISAT 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 459. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3305-7_248

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3305-7_248

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3304-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3305-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics