Skip to main content

Fast Combination Method for Dependent Evidences in the Framework of Hyper-Power Sets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Proceedings of the 2018 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology (APISAT 2018) (APISAT 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 459))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 97 Accesses

Abstract

Two dependent evidences can be viewed as resulted from orthogonal sum of one dependent original evidence and two independent original evidences, respectively. The original method has so many iterations and big calculation, based on these disadvantages, a fast combination method for dependent evidences in the framework of hyper-power sets is proposed in this paper. Equipollent classic Dezert-Smarandache (DSm) rule of combination can be got through importing the commonality function, according to the results of model analysis, theorem proving and example comparison show the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. He Y, Wang GH, Guan X (2010) Information fusion theory with application. Publish House of Electronics Industry, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guan X, Sun GD, Guo Q (2014) Rader emitter parameter recognition based on inter number and evidence theory. Syst Eng Electron 36(7):1269–1274

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guo Q, Guan X, Pan LN, Sun GD (2015) An inference method for evidential networks of multiply connected structure based on mixed parameters and DSmT theory. J CAEIT 10(1):67–74

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fu YW, Yang W, Zhuang ZW (2013) Review on evidence modeling. Syst Eng Electron 35(6):1160–1167

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sun HJ, Yang JY (1999) A combination method for dependent evidences. Chin J Comput 22(9):1004–1007

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang J, Sun HJ (2009) Model for dependent evidences in DSmT framework. Comput Sci 36(8):260–263

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guo Q, He Y, Li XD (2015) Fast DSmT-DS approximate reasoning method. J Electron Inf Technol 37(9):2040–2046

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Z, Pan Q, Dezert J (2014) Credal classification rule for uncertain data based on belief functions. Pattern Recogn 47(7):2532–2541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abbas N, Chibani Y, Belhadi Z (2013) A DSmT based combination scheme for multi-class classification. In: Proceedings 16th international conference on information FUSION (ICIF), Istanbul, Turkey, July 9–12, pp. 1950–1957

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dezert J, Smarandache F (2015) Advances and applications of DSmT for information fusion. American Research Press, Rehohoth

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo Q, He Y, Guan X (2015) An evidence clustering DSmT approximate reasoning method based on convex function analysis. Digit Sig Process

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tan Ji-Wen, Zhan Hong, Wen Yan, Zhan Wei-Xia (2014) New method for multiple cues fusion combined DST and DSmT. Inf Technol J 13(2):393–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smarandache F., Dezert J., Martin A (2014) An alternative combination rule for evidential reasoning. In: Fusion 2014 Conference, pp. 91–94

    Google Scholar 

  14. Qin D, Miao Z, Wang Y (2014) Improved method based on DSmT and its applications in C4ISR system. J Univ Electron Sci Technol China

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rodríguez RM, Bedregal B, Bustince H (2016) A position and perspective analysis of hesitant fuzzy sets on information fusion in decision making: towards high quality progress. Inf Fusion 29:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun GD, Guan X, Yi X, Zhao J (2018) Innovative conflict measurement based on the modified weighted union kernel correlation coefficient. IEEE Access 6:30458–30472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun G D, Guan X, Yi X, Zhao J (2018) Belief intervals aggregation. Int J Intell Syst

    Google Scholar 

  18. Duan XS (1993) Evidence theory, decision making and artificial intelligence. China Renmin University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wen C, Xu X, Jiang H, Zhou Z (2012) A new DSmT combination rule in open frame of discernment and its application. Sci China Inf Sci 55(3):551–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smets P, Kennes R (1992) The concept of distinct evidence. In: Proceedings of the 4th conf on information processing and management of uncertainty in knowledge-based systems (IPMU), pp 789-794

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhao Jing .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jing, Z., Xin, G., Haiqiao, L. (2019). Fast Combination Method for Dependent Evidences in the Framework of Hyper-Power Sets. In: Zhang, X. (eds) The Proceedings of the 2018 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology (APISAT 2018). APISAT 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 459. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3305-7_166

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3305-7_166

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3304-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3305-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics