Skip to main content

Biological Wastewater Treatment for Prevention of River Water Pollution and Reuse: Perspectives and Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Wastewater discharge with high biological oxygen demand (BOD) and high nutrient levels (e.g., nitrate, phosphate) affects water quality and is a major reason for degradation of water bodies, including rivers. In addition, metals and other toxic elements are also concentrated in aquatic bodies due to the continuous disposal of wastewater that is treated or partially treated. In many developing countries, wastewater treatment facilities are not fully operational due to energy crises and improper maintenance. However, under the provisions of the Environmental Protection Act, maximum permissible limits have been established for the disposal of different pollutants into surface water bodies. Therefore, the appropriate treatment of wastewater containing various pollutants is mandatory before its disposal into a body of water. Conventional methods of wastewater treatment use sewage treatment plants; however, they may be unable to treat wastewater properly and completely due to their higher cost and maintenance requirements. In this case, green plant-based technologies such as phytoremediation, the development of constructed wetlands, and algal pond systems may perform key roles in treating wastewater by removing nutrients and toxic metals before their discharge into rivers. By implementing plant-based, low-cost, and eco-friendly technologies for the treatment of wastewater at the source of origin up to a permissible level of discharge, we can prevent the pollution of surface water bodies and recycle the treated water in agriculture for irrigation, gardening, and other purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbasi SA, Ramasami EV (1999) Biotechnological methods of pollution control. University Press, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Homaidan AA, Al-Ghanayem AA, Areej AH (2011) Int J Water Resour Arid Environ:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias CA, Bubba MD, Brix H (2001) Phosphorus removal by sands for use as media in sub-surface flow constructed reed beds. Water Res 35:1159–1168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Assunção AG, Schat H, Aarts MG (2003) Thlaspi caerulescens, an attractive model species to study heavy metal hyper accumulation in plants. New Phytol 159(2):351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahar MM, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2013) Toxicity transformation and accumulation of inorganic arsenic species in microalga Scendesmus sp. isolated from soil. J Appl Phycol 25:913–917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birol E, Das S (2010) Estimating the value of improved wastewater treatment: the case of River Ganga, India. J Environ Manag 91:2163–2171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breen PF (1990) A mass balance method for assessing the potential of artificial wetlands for wastewater treatment. Wat Res 24:689–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breitholtz M, Naslund M, Strae D, Borg H (2012) An evaluation of free water surface wetlands as tertiary sewage water treatment of micro-pollutants. Ecotoxi Environ Saf 78:63–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bursali EA, Cavas L, Seki Y, Bozkurt SS, Yurdakoc M (2009) Chem Eng J 150:385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carty A, Scholz M, Heal K, Gouriveau F, Mustafa A (2008) The universal design, operation and maintenance guidelines for farm constructed wetlands (FCW) in temperate climates. Bioresour Technol 99:6780–6792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cherian S, Oliveira MM (2005) Transgenic plants in phytoremediation: recent advances and new possibilities. Environ Sci Technol 39(24):9377–9390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CPCB (2005) Performance status of common effluent treatment plants in India. Central Pollution Control Board, India

    Google Scholar 

  • CPCB (2007) Advance methods for treatment of textile industry effluents, Resource Recycling Series: RERES/&/2007. Central Pollution Control Board, India

    Google Scholar 

  • CPCB (2009) Forth report on status of water supply, sewage generation and treatment series in India. Central Pollution Control Board, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Craggs RJ, Adey WH, Jenson KR, St. John MS, Green GF, Oswald WJ (1996) Phosphorous removal from wastewater using and algal turf scrubber. Water Sci Technol 33:191–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis JB, Shutes RB, Revitt DM, Zhang TT (1994) Use of macrophytes for pollution treatment in urban wetlands. Resour Conserv Recycl 11:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA, Environmental (Protection) Act, India (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson MC, Chick AJ (1983) Testing the significance of aquatic plants to treat abattoir effluent. Wat Res 17:15–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritioff A, Greger M (2003) Aquatic and terrestrial plant species with potential to remove heavy metals from storm water. Int J Phytoremediation 5:211–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fulekar MH, Singh A, Bhaduri AM (2009) Genetic engineering strategies for enhancing phytoremediation of heavy metals. Afr J Biotechnol 8:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill LW, Ring P, Higgins NM, Johnston PM (2014) Accumulation of heavy metals in a constructed wetland treating road runoff. Ecol Eng 70:133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgetti L, Talouizte H, Merzouki M, Caltavuturo L, Geri C, Frassinetti S (2011) Genotoxicity evaluation of effluents from textile industries of the region Boulmane, Morocco: acase study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74:2275–2283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gochfeld M (2003) Cases of mercury exposure, bioavailability, and adsorption. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 56:174–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray NF (2008) Drinking water quality: problems and solutions. Cambridge University Press. EPA, Environmental (Protection) Act, India, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Guittonny-Philippe A, Masotti V, Höhener P, Boudenne JL, Viglione J, Laffont-Schwob I (2014) Constructed wetlands to reduce metal pollution from industrial catchments in aquatic Mediterranean ecosystems: a review to overcome obstacles and suggest potential solutions. Environ Int 64:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guntensbergen GR, Stearns F, Kadlec JA (1989) Wetland vegetation. In: Hammer DA (ed) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Lewis publishers, Chelsea, pp 73–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadad HR, Maine MA, Bonetto CA (2006) Macrophytes growth in a pilot-scale constructed wetland for industrial wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 63:1744–1753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howes BL, Teal JM (1994) Oxygen loss from Spartina alterniflora and its relation to salt marsh oxygen balance. Oecologia 97:431–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibraheem IBM (1998) Utilization of certain algae in the treatment of wastewater. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Science Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt, pp 197

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenssen PD, Maehlum T, Krogstad T (1993) Potential use of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in northern environments. Water Sci Technol 28:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan D, Christiaen D, Arad S (1988) Binding of heavy metals by algal polysaccharides. In: Stadler T, Mollion J, Verdus MC, Karamanos Y, Morvan H, Christiaen D (eds) Algal biotechnology. Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp 179–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartal B, Kuenen JV, Van Loosdrecht MCM (2010) Sewage treatment with anammox. Science 328:702–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lesage E, Mundia C, Rosseau DPL, Van de Moortel AMK, Du Laing G, Meers E, Tack FMG, De Pauw N, Verloo MG (2007) Sorption of Co, Cu, Ni, and Zn from industrial effluents by the submerged aquatic macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum L. Ecol Eng 30:320–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomax C, Liu WJ, Wu L, Xue K, Xiong J, Zhou J, McGrath SP, Meharg AA, Miller AJ, Zhao FJ (2011) Methylated arsenic species in plants originate from soil microorganisms. New Phytol 193:665–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma AN, Cheah SC, Chow MC (1990) Current status on treatment and utilization of palm oil industrial wasters in Malaysia. Special coordination meeting of the working group on environmental biotechnology, Kuala Lumpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Markandya A, Murty MN (2004) Cost benefit analysis of cleaning the Ganges: some emerging environment and development issues. Environ Dev Econ, Cambridge University Press 9(01):61–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masi F, Caffaz S, Ghrabi A (2013) Multi-stage constructed wetland systems for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 67:1590–1598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta SK, Gaur JP (2005) Use of algae for removing heavy metals ions from wasterwater, progress and prospects. Crit Rev Biotechnol 25:113–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra VK, Tripathi BD (2009) Accumulation of chromium and zinc from aqueous solutions using water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). J Hazard Mater 164:1059–1063

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald WJ (1988) Micro-algae and wastewater treatment. In: Borowitzka MA, Borowitzka LJ (eds) Micro-algal biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 305–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovecka M, Takac T (2014) Managing heavy metal toxicity stress in plants: biological and biotechnological tools. Biotechnol Adv 32:73–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peng KJ, Luo CL, Lou LQ, Li XD, Shen ZG (2008) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals by the aquatic plants Potamogeton pectinatus L. and Potamogeton malaianus Miq. and their potential use for contamination indicators and in wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 392:22–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson SB, Teal JM (1996) The role of plants in ecologically engineered wastewater treatment systems. Ecol Eng 6:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilon M, Cohu CM, Ravet K, Abdel-Ghany SE, Gaymard F (2009) Essential transition metal homeostasis in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:347–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Purushothaman P, Chakrapani GJ (2007) Heavy metals fractionation in Ganga River sediments. India Environ Monit Assess Sep 132:475–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rai UN (2004) Plantation on the banks of river ganga. Gandhi, Ganga, Giriraj. Navjivan Publishing House, Ahmedabad, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai UN, Singh NK, Shukla MK, Verma S, Prasad D, Khan SR (2010) Plant based Management of Ganga Water Pollution: constructed wetland for waste treatment and river front plantation. In: Pandey DD (ed) Environmental pollution: a threat to living world. Jaspal Prakashan, Patna, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai UN, Singh NK, Verma S, Prasad D, Upadhyay AK (2011) Perspectives in plant based management of ganga water pollution: a negative carbon technique to rehabilitate river ecosystem. Appl Bot Abs 31:64–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai UN, Prasad D, Verma S, Upadhyay AK, Singh NK (2012) Bio monitoring of metals in ganga water at different Ghats of Haridwar: implications of constructed wetland for sewage detoxification. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89:805–810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rai UN, Tripathi RD, Singh NK, Upadhyay AK, Dwivedi S, Shukla MK, Mallick S, Singh SN, Nautiyal CS (2013) Constructed wetland as an Ecotechnological tool for pollution treatment for conservation of Ganga River. Bioresour Technol 148:535–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rai UN, Upadhyay AK, Singh NK, Dwivedi S, Tripathi RD (2015) Seasonal applicability of horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetland for trace elements and nutrient removal from urban wastes to conserve Ganga River water quality at Haridwar, India. Ecol Eng 81:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rascioa N, Navari-Izzo F (2011) Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: how and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting? Plant Sci 180:169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin I (1996) Plant genetic engineering may help with environmental cleanup. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:3164–3166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed SC, Crites RW, Middlebrooks EJ (1995) Natural Systems for Waste Management and Treatment 2nded. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 173–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers KH, Breen PF, Chick AJ (1991) Nitrogen removal in experimental wetland treatment systems: evidence for the role of aquatic plants. Res J Water Polit Control Fed 63:934–941

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salt DE, Blaylock M, Kumar PBAN, Dushenkov V, Ensley BD, Chet I (1995) Phytoremediation: a novel strategy for removal of toxic metals from the environment using plant. Nat Biotechnol 13:468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz M, Lee BH (2005) Constructed wetlands: a review. Int J Environ Stud 62(4):421–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelef G, Azov Y, Moraine R, Oron G (1980) In: Shelef G, Soeder CJ (eds) Algal mass production as an integral part of wastewater treatment and reclamation system in algal biomass. Elsevier, pp 163–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheoran AS, Sheoran V (2006) Heavy metal removal mechanism of acid mine drainage in wetlands: a critical review. Miner Eng 19(2):105–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KP, Mohan D, Sinha S, Dalwani R (2004) Impact assessment of treated/untreated wastewater toxicants discharged by sewage treatment plants on health, agricultural, and environmental quality in the wastewater disposal area. Chemosphere 55:227–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh NK, Raghubanshi AS, Upadhyay AK, Rai UN (2016) Arsenic and other heavy metal accumulation in plants and algae growing naturally in contaminated area of West Bengal, India. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 130:224–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart WDP (1966) Nitrogen fixation in plants. Athlene Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sune N, Sanchez G, Caffarattia S, Maine MA (2007) Cadmium and chromium removal kinetics from solution by two aquatic macrophytes. Environ Pollut 145:467–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suresh B, Ravishankar GA (2004) Phytoremediation: a novel and promising approach for environmental cleanup. Crit Rev Biotechnol 24:97–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talke IN, Hanikenne M, Krämer U (2006) Zinc-dependent global transcriptional control, transcriptional deregulation, and higher gene copy number for genes in metal homeostasis of the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri. Plant Physiol 142:148–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tangahu BV, Abdullah SRS, Basri H, Idris M, Anuar N, Mukhlisin M (2011) A review on heavy metals (As, Pb, and Hg) uptake by plants through phytoremediation. Int J Chem Eng 2011:31. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/939161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993) Subsurface flow constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. A Technology Assessment. Office of Water, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyay AK, Singh NK, Rai UN (2014) Comparative metal accumulation potential of Potamogeton pectinatus and Potamogeton crispus: role of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants in tolerance and detoxification of metals. Aquat Bot 117:27–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyay AK, Singh NK, Singh R, Rai UN (2016) Amelioration of arsenic toxicity in rice: comparative effect of inoculation of Chlorella vulgaris and Nannochloropsis sp. on growth, biochemical changes and arsenic uptake. Ecoto Environ Saf 124:68–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyay AK, Singh NK, Bankoti NS, Rai UN (2017) Designing and construction of simulated constructed wetland for treatment of sewage containing metals. Environ Technol 38:2691–2699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang NX, Li Y, Deng XH, Miao AJ, Ji R, Yang LY (2013) Toxicity and bioaccumulation kinetics of arsenate in two freshwater green algae under different phosphate regimes. Water Res 47:2497–2506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong CM, Williams CE, Pittock J, Collier U, Schelle P (2007) World’s top 10 rivers at risk. WWF International, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Zhang J, Li P, Zhang J, Xie H, Zhang B (2011) Nutrient removal in constructed microcosm wetlands for treating polluted river water in northern China. Ecol Eng 37:560–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang DQ, Gersberg RM, Hua T, Zhu J, Tuan NA, Tan SK (2012) Pharmaceutical removal in tropical sub-surface flow constructed wetlands at varying hydraulic rates. Chemosphere 87:273–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is thankful to the Dean and Director of the School of Basic Sciences at Manipal University, Jaipur, India, for providing facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Singh, N.K., Gupta, G., Upadhyay, A.K., Rai, U.N. (2019). Biological Wastewater Treatment for Prevention of River Water Pollution and Reuse: Perspectives and Challenges. In: Singh, R., Kolok, A., Bartelt-Hunt, S. (eds) Water Conservation, Recycling and Reuse: Issues and Challenges. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3179-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics