Skip to main content

Energy Footprints of Food Products

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Footprints of the Food and Textile Sectors

Abstract

In numerous regions, ecological issues that are both local (for instance, high rates of urbanization, mechanical exercises, arrive utilize changes, or rural practices,) and worldwide (for instance, desertification, or deforestation) have significantly lessened the capacity of land to ingest CO2. A few endeavors have been made to orchestrate rules for natural footprints of food. The energy footprint, similar to the environmental footprint, is a marker of advance that can be utilized as methods for activating activity at the neighborhood level. It is an effectively comprehended idea as it scales the message down to the level of a person. It additionally legitimizes associations and cooperation among various partners to discover new, economical and less harming arrangements. The data exhibit that the impressions are critical, both locally, national and comprehensive and have comes about for overall sustenance security and condition prosperity and effectiveness. The writing about concurs that worldwide sustenance creation framework produces impressive natural impressions and the circumstance would likely get troubling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aide TM, Clark ML, Grau HR et al (2013) Deforestation and reforestation of Latin America and the Caribbean (2001–2010). Biotropica 46:262–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G et al (2013) Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: the national footprint accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol Indic 24:518–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne D, O’Regan B, Moles R (2009) Use of ecological footprinting to explorealternative domestic energy and electricity policy scenarios in an Irish city-region. Energ Policy 37:2205–2213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cederberg C, Henriksson M, Berglund et al (2013) An LCA researcher’s wish list—data and emission models needed to improve LCA studies of animal production. Animal 7:212–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CZ, Lin ZS (2008) Multiple timescale analysis and factor analysis of energyecological footprint growth in China 1953–2006. Energ Policy 36:1666–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow J, Kopp RJ, Portney PR (2003) Energy resources and global development. Science 302:1528–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalgaard R, Schmidt J, Halberg N, Christensen P, Thrane M, Pengue A (2008) LCA of Soybean Meal. Int J LCA 13:240–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufosse K, Gabrielle B, Drouet JL et al (2013) Using agroecosystem modelling to improve the estimates of N2O emissions in the life cycle assessment of biofuels. Waste Biomass Valor 4:593–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferng JJ (2002) Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints. Ecol Econ 40:53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzherbert EB, Struebig MJ, Morel A et al (2008) How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends Ecol Evolut 23(10):538–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flysjo A, Cederberg C, Henriksson M et al (2011) How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. J Life Cycle Assess 16:420–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez C, Witter SG, Hall CA et al (2000) The Costa Rican banana industry: can it be sustainable. Quantifying Sustain Dev: The Future of Trop Econ 563–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Hortenhuber S, Piringer G, Zollitsch W et al (2014) Land use and land use change in agricultural life cycle assessments and carbon footprints-the case for regionally specific land use change versus other methods. J Clean Prod 73:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hylander K, Nemomissa S, Delrue J et al (2013) Effects of coffee management on deforestation rates and forest integrity. Conserv Biol 27(5):1031–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson MZ (2008) Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security. Energy Environ Sci 2:148–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr RA (2010) Natural gas from shale bursts onto the scene. Science 328:1624–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Hanjra MA (2009) Footprints of water and energy inputs in food production—global perspectives. Food Policy 34:130–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kros H, Lesschen JP, Bannink A et al (2012) Review on calculation methodologies and improvement of mechanistic modelling of GHG emissions. DLO, Wageningen, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel CN, Borton DN (2002) Increased human energy use causes biological diversity loss and undermines prospects for sustainability. Bioscience 52:929–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald RI, Fargione J, Kiesecker J et al (2009) Energy sprawl or energy efficiency: climate policy on natural habitat for the United States of America. PLoS ONE 4:6802. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Herz M, Glickstein M et al (2002) Renewable energy: current and potential issues. Bioscience 52:1111–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponsioen TC, Blonk TJ (2012) Calculating land use change in carbon footprints of agricultural products as an impact of current land use. J Clean Prod 28:120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S et al (2008) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Int J LCA 13:290–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson S (2008) Conceptual modeling for simulation Part I: definition and requirements. J Oper Res Soc 59(3):278–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruf F, Schroth G (2004) Chocolate forests and monocultures: a historical review of cocoa growing and its conflicting role in tropical deforestation and forest conservation. In: Agro forestry and biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes. Island Press, Washington, pp 107–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Santek B, Gwehenberger G, Santek MI et al (2010) Evaluation of energy demand and the sustainability of different bioethanol production processes from sugar beet. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:872–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T et al (2006) Livestock’s long shadow. FAO, Rome, p 229

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart WM, Dibb DW, Johnston AE et al (2005) The contribution of commercial fertilizer nutrients to food production. Agron J 97(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoglehner G (2003) Ecological footprint—a tool for assessing sustainable energysupplies. J Clean Prod 11:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh JCJM, Verbruggen H (1999) Spatial sustainability, tradeand indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’. Ecol Econ 29:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlek P, Rodraguez-Kuhl G, Sommer R (2004) Energy use and CO2 production in tropical agriculture and means and strategies for reduction or mitigation. Environ Dev Sustain 6(1):213–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Lewan L, Hansson CB (1999) Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint. Ambio 28:604–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society, Gabriola Island, British Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann T (2009) A first empirical comparison of energy footprints embodiedin trade—MRIO versus PLUM. Ecol Econ 68:1975–1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yergin D (2006) Ensuring energy security. Foreign Aff 85:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Senthil Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Senthil Kumar, P., Saravanan, A. (2019). Energy Footprints of Food Products. In: Muthu, S. (eds) Energy Footprints of the Food and Textile Sectors. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2956-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics