Abstract
In numerous regions, ecological issues that are both local (for instance, high rates of urbanization, mechanical exercises, arrive utilize changes, or rural practices,) and worldwide (for instance, desertification, or deforestation) have significantly lessened the capacity of land to ingest CO2. A few endeavors have been made to orchestrate rules for natural footprints of food. The energy footprint, similar to the environmental footprint, is a marker of advance that can be utilized as methods for activating activity at the neighborhood level. It is an effectively comprehended idea as it scales the message down to the level of a person. It additionally legitimizes associations and cooperation among various partners to discover new, economical and less harming arrangements. The data exhibit that the impressions are critical, both locally, national and comprehensive and have comes about for overall sustenance security and condition prosperity and effectiveness. The writing about concurs that worldwide sustenance creation framework produces impressive natural impressions and the circumstance would likely get troubling.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aide TM, Clark ML, Grau HR et al (2013) Deforestation and reforestation of Latin America and the Caribbean (2001–2010). Biotropica 46:262–271
Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G et al (2013) Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: the national footprint accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol Indic 24:518–533
Browne D, O’Regan B, Moles R (2009) Use of ecological footprinting to explorealternative domestic energy and electricity policy scenarios in an Irish city-region. Energ Policy 37:2205–2213
Cederberg C, Henriksson M, Berglund et al (2013) An LCA researcher’s wish list—data and emission models needed to improve LCA studies of animal production. Animal 7:212–219
Chen CZ, Lin ZS (2008) Multiple timescale analysis and factor analysis of energyecological footprint growth in China 1953–2006. Energ Policy 36:1666–1678
Chow J, Kopp RJ, Portney PR (2003) Energy resources and global development. Science 302:1528–1531
Dalgaard R, Schmidt J, Halberg N, Christensen P, Thrane M, Pengue A (2008) LCA of Soybean Meal. Int J LCA 13:240–254
Dufosse K, Gabrielle B, Drouet JL et al (2013) Using agroecosystem modelling to improve the estimates of N2O emissions in the life cycle assessment of biofuels. Waste Biomass Valor 4:593–606
Ferng JJ (2002) Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints. Ecol Econ 40:53–69
Fitzherbert EB, Struebig MJ, Morel A et al (2008) How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends Ecol Evolut 23(10):538–545
Flysjo A, Cederberg C, Henriksson M et al (2011) How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. J Life Cycle Assess 16:420–430
Hernandez C, Witter SG, Hall CA et al (2000) The Costa Rican banana industry: can it be sustainable. Quantifying Sustain Dev: The Future of Trop Econ 563–593
Hortenhuber S, Piringer G, Zollitsch W et al (2014) Land use and land use change in agricultural life cycle assessments and carbon footprints-the case for regionally specific land use change versus other methods. J Clean Prod 73:31–39
Hylander K, Nemomissa S, Delrue J et al (2013) Effects of coffee management on deforestation rates and forest integrity. Conserv Biol 27(5):1031–1040
Jacobson MZ (2008) Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security. Energy Environ Sci 2:148–173
Kerr RA (2010) Natural gas from shale bursts onto the scene. Science 328:1624–1626
Khan S, Hanjra MA (2009) Footprints of water and energy inputs in food production—global perspectives. Food Policy 34:130–140
Kros H, Lesschen JP, Bannink A et al (2012) Review on calculation methodologies and improvement of mechanistic modelling of GHG emissions. DLO, Wageningen, Netherlands
McDaniel CN, Borton DN (2002) Increased human energy use causes biological diversity loss and undermines prospects for sustainability. Bioscience 52:929–936
McDonald RI, Fargione J, Kiesecker J et al (2009) Energy sprawl or energy efficiency: climate policy on natural habitat for the United States of America. PLoS ONE 4:6802. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006802
Pimentel D, Herz M, Glickstein M et al (2002) Renewable energy: current and potential issues. Bioscience 52:1111–1120
Ponsioen TC, Blonk TJ (2012) Calculating land use change in carbon footprints of agricultural products as an impact of current land use. J Clean Prod 28:120–126
Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S et al (2008) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Int J LCA 13:290–300
Robinson S (2008) Conceptual modeling for simulation Part I: definition and requirements. J Oper Res Soc 59(3):278–290
Ruf F, Schroth G (2004) Chocolate forests and monocultures: a historical review of cocoa growing and its conflicting role in tropical deforestation and forest conservation. In: Agro forestry and biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes. Island Press, Washington, pp 107–134
Santek B, Gwehenberger G, Santek MI et al (2010) Evaluation of energy demand and the sustainability of different bioethanol production processes from sugar beet. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:872–877
Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T et al (2006) Livestock’s long shadow. FAO, Rome, p 229
Stewart WM, Dibb DW, Johnston AE et al (2005) The contribution of commercial fertilizer nutrients to food production. Agron J 97(1):1–6
Stoglehner G (2003) Ecological footprint—a tool for assessing sustainable energysupplies. J Clean Prod 11:267–277
Van den Bergh JCJM, Verbruggen H (1999) Spatial sustainability, tradeand indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’. Ecol Econ 29:61–72
Vlek P, Rodraguez-Kuhl G, Sommer R (2004) Energy use and CO2 production in tropical agriculture and means and strategies for reduction or mitigation. Environ Dev Sustain 6(1):213–233
Wackernagel M, Lewan L, Hansson CB (1999) Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint. Ambio 28:604–612
Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society, Gabriola Island, British Columbia
Wiedmann T (2009) A first empirical comparison of energy footprints embodiedin trade—MRIO versus PLUM. Ecol Econ 68:1975–1990
Yergin D (2006) Ensuring energy security. Foreign Aff 85:69–82
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Senthil Kumar, P., Saravanan, A. (2019). Energy Footprints of Food Products. In: Muthu, S. (eds) Energy Footprints of the Food and Textile Sectors. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2956-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2956-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2955-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2956-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)