Do We Need New Legal Personhood in the Age of Robots and AI?
Do we need to give robots and AI entities a kind of legal personhood in a robotized society where activities with legal effect are increasingly performed by AI systems and autonomous robots? In this chapter, this question is considered by comparing the requirements of existing legal subjects, natural persons and (artificial) legal persons such as corporations and states. The relevance of free will, intelligence and consciousness of natural persons to acquire legal personhood are analysed and compared with other beings, animals and future AI entities. To give legal personhood to AI is also influenced by the human conviction that this would increase the risk to lose control and a “robot uprising.” Man, as always is afraid of technology getting out of hand and is convinced of their own superiority and therefore always wants to stay in control. In that context, the need for a certain legal personhood in a future legal framework, considering civil liability and even criminal liability is discussed as it is also subjected to considerations by the European Parliament, eventually leading to proposals in European law.
KeywordsArtificial intelligence Big Data Ethics Human control Privacy GDPR Legal personhood Subject Disruptive technologies Liability Singularity Robot law
- Asimov, I. (1976). The bicentennial man and other stories. London: Victor Gollancz Ltd.Google Scholar
- Asimov, I., & Silverberg, R. (1993). The positronic man. London: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Berriat Saint-Prix, J. (1829). Rapport et recherches sur les procès et jugemens relatifs aux animaux. Paris: Imprimerie de Selligue.Google Scholar
- Bodin, J. (1955). Les six Livres de la Republique (trans: M. J. Tooley). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Brownlie, I. (1990). Principles of public international law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Burkhart, L. (2016). Symposium—Governance of emerging technologies: Law, policy, and ethics. Jurimetrics, 56, 219–222. Available at: https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/science_technology/2016/governance_in_emerging_technologies.authcheckdam.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2017.
- Carlile, R. (1822). To the republicans of the island of Great Britain. Republican, 16(V).Google Scholar
- Clarke, A. C. (1973). Profiles of the future: An inquiry into the limits of the possible. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Darling, K. (2016). Electronic love, trust, & abuse: Social aspects of robotics. Workshop at the University of Miami, Conference “We Robot”, April 2016.Google Scholar
- Delvaux, M. (2017). Report PE582.443v01-00 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)) http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A8-2017-0005+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN. Accessed December 8, 2017.
- Descartes, R. (1973). Principia philosophiae. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
- Erven D onder de Linden en zoon. (1831). Boekzaal der geleerde wereld: En tijdschrift voor de Protestantsche kerken in het koningrijk der Nederlanden, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Future of Life Institute. (2017). An open letter to the United Nations convention on certain conventional weapons. Available at: https://futureoflife.org/autonomous-weapons-open-letter-2017/. Accessed August 21, 2017.
- Gardner, H. (1993). The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Geldart, W. M. (1911). Legal personality. Law Quarterly Review, 27, 90–108.Google Scholar
- Good, I. J. (1965). Speculations concerning the first ultraintelligent machine. In F. L. Alt & M. Rubinoff (Eds.), Advances in computers (Vol. 6, pp. 31–88). Cambridge: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Hildebrandt, M., & Gaakeer, J. (Eds.). (2013). Human law and computer law: Comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hobbes, T. (1651). Chapter xvi: Of persons, authors, and things personated. In Leviathan. London: Andrew Crooke.Google Scholar
- Kurzweil, R. (1990). The age of intelligent machines. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lovejoy, A. O. (1936). The great chain of being: A study of the history of an idea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Mayer, C. J. (1990). Personalizing the impersonal: Corporations and the bill of rights. Hastings Law Journal, 41(3), 577–667.Google Scholar
- Minors, D. (2017). Can you read my mind? Available at: https://www.wits.ac.za/news/latest-news/research-news/2017/2017-09/can-you-read-my-mind. Accessed October 11, 2017.
- Mori, M. (2012). The uncanny valley: The original essay by Masahiro Mori. https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/humanoids/the-uncanny-valley. Accessed October 15, 2017.
- Ohlin, J. D. (2005). Is the concept of person necessary for human rights? Columbia Law Review, 105, 209–249.Google Scholar
- Raskin, M. (2017). The law and legality of smart contracts. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 304(1). https://www.georgetownlawtechreview.org/the-law-and-legality-of-smart-contracts/GLTR-04-2017/. Accessed October 20, 2017.
- Richards, N. M., & King, J. H. (2014). Big data ethics. Wake Forest Law Review, 49, 393–432.Google Scholar
- Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Safi, M. (2017). Ganges and Yamuna rivers granted same legal rights as human beings. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/21/ganges-and-yamuna-rivers-granted-same-legal-rights-as-human-beings. Accessed May 13, 2017.
- Schaerer, E., Kelley, R., & Nicolescu, M. (2009). Robots as animals: A framework for liability and responsibility in human-robot interaction. In Robot and human interaction communication. RO-MAN 2009—The 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication. Journal Advanced Robotics, 24(13), 1861–1871.Google Scholar
- Science and Technology Committee. (2016). Robotics and artificial intelligence. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmsctech/145/14506.htm#_idTextAnchor014. Accessed October 25, 2017.
- Segrave, K. (2002). Vending machines: An American social history. Chicago: McFarland & Co.Google Scholar
- Shoyama, R. (2005). Intelligent agents: Authors, makers, and owners of computer-generated works in Canadian copyright law. Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, 4(2), 129–140.Google Scholar
- Solum, L. B. (1992). Legal personhood for artificial intelligences. North Carolina Law Review, 70(4), 1238–1239.Google Scholar
- Teubner, G. (2007). Rights of Non-humans? Electronic agents and animals as new actors in politics and law. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute.Google Scholar
- The Global Slavery Index. (2016). https://www.globalslaveryindex.org/findings/. Accessed October 12, 2017.
- Tjong Tjin Tai, T. F. E. (2016). Private law for homo digitalis, use and maintenance. In Preliminary advice for NVJ (p. 248).Google Scholar
- Vinge, V. (1993). The coming technological singularity: How to survive in the post-human era. NASA, Lewis Research Center, Vision, 21, 11–22. Available at: https://edoras.sdsu.edu/~vinge/misc/singularity.html. Accessed October 25, 2017.
- Von Bar, C., & Clive, E. (Eds.). (2009). Principles, definitions and model rules of European private law: Draft Common Frame of Reference (CDFR). Munich: Sellier. European Law Publishers GmbH.Google Scholar
- Voulon, M. B. (2010). Automatisch Contracteren. Dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
- Weschler, D. (1955). The range of human capacities. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
- Wiener, N. (1950). The human use of human beings. Houghton Mifflin: Eyre & Spottiswoode.Google Scholar