Skip to main content

Simulation Credibility Evaluation Based on Multi-source Data Fusion

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 946))

Abstract

Real-world system experiment data, similar system running data, empirical data or domain knowledge of SME (subject matter expert) can serve as observed data in credibility evaluation. It is of great significance to study how to incorporate multi-source observed data to evaluate the validity of the model. Generally, data fusion methods are categorized into original data fusion, feature level fusion, and decision level fusion. In this paper, we firstly discuss the hierarchy of multiple source data fusion in credibility evaluation. Then, a Bayesian feature fusion method and a MADM-based (multiple attribute decision making) decision fusion approach are proposed for credibility evaluation. The proposed methods are available under different data scenarios. Furthermore, two case studies are provided to examine the effectiveness of credibility evaluation methods with data fusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Min, F.Y., Yang, M., Wang, Z.C.: Knowledge-based method for the validation of complex simulation models. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 18(5), 500–515 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, C.Z., Mahadevan, S.: Role of calibration, validation, and relevance in multi-level uncertainty integration. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 148, 32–43 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mullins, J., Ling, Y., Mahadevan, S., Sun, L., Strachan, A.: Separation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic model validation. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 147, 49–59 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, Z.Q., Fu, Y., Yang, R.Y.: Model validation of dynamic engineering models under uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li, X., Chen, W., Chan, C.Y., Li, B., Song, S.H.: Multi-sensor fusion methodology for enhanced land vehicle positioning. Inf. Fusion 46, 51–62 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, Y.M., Hsueh, C.S., Wang, C.K., Wu, T.Y.: Sensor fusion, sensitivity analysis and calibration in shooter localization systems. J. Comput. Sci. 25, 327–338 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, J., Su, Y.H., Cheng, Y.W., Shao, X.Y., Deng, C., Liu, C.: Multi-sensor information fusion for remaining useful life prediction of machining tools by adaptive network based fuzzy inference system. Appl. Soft Comput. 68, 13–23 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Novak, D., Riener, R.: A survey of sensor fusion methods in wearable robotics. Robot. Auton. Syst. 73, 155–170 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. William, H., Xu, X., Prasanta, K.D.: Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202, 16–24 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, H., Bao, Y.Q., Ou, J.P.: Structural damage identification based on integration of information fusion and Shannon entropy. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 22, 1427–1440 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma, P., Zhou, Y.C., Shang, X.B., Yang, M.: Firing accuracy evaluation of electromagnetic railgun based on multicriteria optimal Latin hypercube design. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 45(7), 1503–1511 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McNab, I.R.: Pulsed power options for large EM launchers. In: 2014 17th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Launch Technology (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kheir, N.A., Holmes, W.M.: On validating simulation models of missile systems. Simulation 30(4), 117–128 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roy, C.J., Oberkampf, W.L.: A comprehensive framework for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200(25), 2131–2144 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, Y.C.: Transformation methods and assistant tools from data consistency analysis result to simulation credibility. Master dissertation, Harbin Institute of Technology, China (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61374164 and 61627810).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Ma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhou, Y., Fang, K., Ma, P., Yang, M. (2018). Simulation Credibility Evaluation Based on Multi-source Data Fusion. In: Li, L., Hasegawa, K., Tanaka, S. (eds) Methods and Applications for Modeling and Simulation of Complex Systems. AsiaSim 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 946. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2853-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2853-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2852-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2853-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics