Skip to main content

Sustainable City Indicators in Malaysia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Development and Quantification of Sustainability Indicators

Abstract

At the district stages, sustainability is shaped by the place and the citizen’s demand. As a result, the authorities resolve to the progress of sustainability pointers that quantify the progress of a community or a city. A large number of existing studies in the broader literature have examined the obstacles and approaches towards achieving sustainable cites. Among the discussed issues are the development of indicators that assess the level of sustainability of a city. Sustainable city indicators are the tool used to gauge the progress of a community or a city on selected themes or subjects relating to sustainability. Despite decades of research, the effectiveness of the sustainable city indicators is still debatable. There exist various types of sustainable indicators being studied and implemented nationally and internationally. This chapter focuses on sustainability indicators focusing in Malaysia. It is to analyse the notional context of indicators for sustainable city applied by the Malaysian authorities. The chapter also looks into the implementation of sustainable city indicators by the Shah Alam City Council as a case study. The gathered data are analysed using content analysis. The findings deliver an overall insight of sustainable city indicators used worldwide and the implementation of sustainable city indicators in Malaysia. This research facilitates the local authorities, professionals and urban planners in revising and improving the current use of sustainable city indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ayres, R. U., Jeroen Van Den Bergh C. J. M. & Gowdy, J. M. (1998). Viewpoint: Weak versus strong sustainability. In Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers (pp. 98–103). Retrieved from http://www.tinbergen.nl.

  • Böhringera, C., & Jochemc, P. E. P. (2007). Measuring the immeasurable—A survey of sustainability indices. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booysen, F. (2002). An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development. Social Indicators Research, 59(2), 115–151. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016275505152

  • Brundtland, G. H. (1987). World commission on environment and development. Our Common Future. https://doi.org/10.1080/07488008808408783

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E. P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. W. L. (1976). The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations and Satisfaction. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, C. W., & Rixford, C. (1998). Lessons learned from the history of social indicators: Redefining progress. San Francisco: Redefining Progress. https://doi.org/10.2307/492843.

  • Crivits, M., Prové, C., Block, T., & Dessein, J. (2016). Four Perspectives of Sustainability Applied to the Local Food Strategy of Ghent (Belgium): Need for a Cycle of Democratic Participation? Sustainability, 8(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010055

  • de Albuquerque, M. F. C. (2016). The sustainable use of biodiversity and its implications in agriculture: The agroforestry case in the brazilian legal framework. In Legal Aspects of Sustainable Development (pp. 585–606). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26021-1_29.

  • Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2013). Sustainability Science for Strong Sustainability. Université Catholique de Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, S., & Neumayer, E. (2007). Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurement. Ecological Economics, 61(4), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.007

  • Fricker, A. (1998). Measuring up to sustainability. Futures 30(4):367–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(98)00041-X

  • Gasteyer, B. S., & Flora, C. B. (1999). Social Indicators : An Annotated Bibliography on Trends, Sources and Development, 1960–1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J., Pfeffer, K., Ros-Tonen, M., & Verrest, H. (2015). An inclusive development perspective on the geographies of urban governance. In Geographies of Urban Governance (pp. 217–228). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21272-2_11.

  • Hajer, M., Nilsson, M., Raworth, K., Bakker, P., Berkhout, F., de Boer, Y. etc. (2015). Beyond cockpit-ism: Four insights to enhance the transformative potential of the sustainable development goals. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(2), 1651–1660. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021651.

  • Jamalunlaili, A., Zulhafidz, M. Y., Mohd Zuwairi, M. Y., & Mohd Shakir, M. A. S. (2009). Urban Sprawl in Malaysia. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners,7:69–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment: Science and Policy, 47(3), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444.

  • Kjell, O. N. E. (2011). Sustainable well-being: A potential synergy between sustainability and well-being research. Review of General Psychology, 15(3):255–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024603

  • Kuhlman, T., & Farrington, J. (2010). What is Sustainability? Sustainability, 2(11):3436–3448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2113436

  • Land, K. C., & Ferriss, A. L. (2006). The sociology of social indicators. In 21st century sociology: A reference handbook. (pp. 518–526). United Kingdom: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen, M., Sébastien, L., & Bauler, T. (2016). The multiple roles of sustainability indicators in informational governance: Between intended use and unanticipated inffiuence. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.009

  • Leiby, J. (1970). Carroll Wright and Labor Reform: The Origin of Labor Statistics—James Leiby—Google Books. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancebo, F. (2007). Le développement durable en question(s). CyberGeo, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.10913.

  • Mari, S. M., & Jankovi, S. M. (2014). Towards a Framework for Evaluating Sustainable Society Index. Romanian Statistical Review, 62(3), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuleman, L., & Niestroy, I. (2015). Common but differentiated governance: A metagovernance approach to make the SDGs work. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(9):12295–12321. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912295

  • Morse, S., McNamara, N., Acholo, M., & Okwoli, B. (2001). Sustainability indicators: The problem of integration. Sustainable Development, 9(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.148

  • Nations, J., & Nigh, R. B. (1980). The evolutionary potential of lacandon Maya sustained-yield tropical forest agriculture. Journal of Anthropological Research, 36(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2007). Sustainability and well-being. In M. McGillivray (Ed.), Human well-being: Concept and measurement (pp. 193–213). Palgrave Macmillan UK: United Nations University. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625600_8.

  • Neumayer, E. (2012). Human development and sustainability. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(4):561–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2012.693067

  • O’Brien, C. (2012). Sustainable happiness and well-being: Future directions for positive psychology. Psychology, 3(12):1196–1201. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.312A177

  • Pope, J., Annandale, D., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2004). Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.03.001

  • Porter, M. E., Stern, S., & Artavia Loría, R. (2015). Social Progress Index, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosly, D., & Rashid, A. A. (2013). Incorporating happiness and well-being into sustainable development: Indicators framework. Malaysian Townplan Journal, 9(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, A. (1999). A survey of indicators of economic and social well-being. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks, Centre for the Study of Living Standards

    Google Scholar 

  • Smajgl, A., & Ward, J. (2013). The water-food-energy nexus in the Mekong region: Assessing development strategies considering cross-sectoral and transboundary impacts (Vol. 9781461461). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6120-3.

  • Strange, T., & Bayley, A. (2011) Sustainable development—linking economy, society, environment. Energy Policy, 39(10–2):6082–6099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.009

  • Valentin, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2000). A guide to community sustainability indicators. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(3), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00049-4

  • Veenhoven, R. (2002). Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 58(1–3):33–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Viederman, S. (1995). Knowledge for sustainable development: what do we need to know? In T. Trzyna (Ed.). A sustainable world: Defining and measuring sustainability (pp. 37–40). Sacra- Mentoo: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hauff, M. (2016). Sustainable development in economics. In Sustainability science (pp. 99–107). Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. C., & Wu, J. (2017). The problems of weak sustainability and associated indicators. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 24(1):44–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1136360

  • Wu, J. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28(6):999–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter is dedicated to Taylors University, UPM and Universiti Teknologi MARA. Appreciation to the co-researcher in the completion of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filzani Illia Ibrahim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ibrahim, F.I., Bakar, A.A., Omar, D. (2019). Sustainable City Indicators in Malaysia. In: Muthu, S. (eds) Development and Quantification of Sustainability Indicators. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2556-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics