Managing Discussion Sessions (Q&A)

Part of the Springer Texts in Education book series (SPTE)


The Q&A or discussion session (hereafter ‘DS’) is considered to be a quintessential feature of not only the CP itself but one of the key events of the academic conference in general. The DS is where research hypotheses are truly tested—by the judgment of one’s peers. As a result, given the combination of the open-ended, unpredictable nature of these sessions along with the heightened possibility of facing criticism, DSs can be the most stressful part of the entire conference experience, particularly for NNES and novice presenters. In this chapter, we will discuss the academic foundations underlying DS discourse, some of the common DS coping strategies used by effective presenters, the expected role of discussants in DSs, and some of the vagaries associated with this distinctive conference speech event.


  1. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Guest, M. (2013). Japanese doctors at international medical conferences: Why the worry? Journal of Medical English Education, 12(3), 47–55.Google Scholar
  3. Skelton, J. (2007). The representation of truth in academic medical writing. Applied Linguistics, 18(2–1), 121–140. doi: Scholar
  4. Webber, P. (1997). From argumentation to argument: Interaction in the conference hall. ASp, 15–18, 439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Webber, P. (2002). The paper is now open for discussion. In E. Ventola, C. Shalom, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The language of conferencing (pp. 247–254). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MiyazakiMiyazakiJapan

Personalised recommendations