Conference Presentation Introductions and Openings

Part of the Springer Texts in Education book series (SPTE)


In this chapter, we will discuss how to give effective openings in a CP. It is in the opening where the speaker can establish rapport with an audience, develop an interpersonal dimension, create a ‘voice’ for him or herself, ground the tenor, and provide the audience with the rhetorical structure of the CP. Therefore, effective openings are essential in determining effective CP performance. But which discursive, rhetorical, and linguistic choices are most frequent? And which would be most effective according to the presentation type and content? The generic, linguistic, and rhetorical features of introductions and opening CP moves might initially seem peripheral when the presenter naturally wishes to focus upon the research content, but the choice of opening gambit must be given thorough consideration by those presuming to teach CP skills to novice researchers and academics, as well as novice researchers who hope to successfully present at international academic conferences, as the explicit use of rhetorical moves and discourse markers in introductory sections will serve to both guide and engage the audience as well as to ‘position’ the speaker. Based on my observations, the most salient opening gambits included: opening directly into the research content, using rhetorical questions, shared research/academic knowledge, providing background information, and avoiding unnecessary self-introduction data, minimizing anecdotes, and limiting personal appeals to the audience. We will also look briefly at body language and posture concerns, followed by a short overview of how openings might best be managed in agnate conference speech events.


  1. Anderson, C. (2016). TED talks: The official TED guide to public speaking. London: Headline Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2003). Analysing the scientific conference presentation: A methodological overview of a multimodal genre. ASp, 39–40, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2005). The rhetoric of conference presentation introductions: context, argument and interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guest, M. (2014). 国際学会のためのサバイバル英語術, (Survival English for academic conferences: A candid guide for Japanese doctors). Tokyo: Medical View.Google Scholar
  5. Sanderson, T. (2008). Interaction, identity and culture in academic writing: The case of German, British and American academics in the humanities. In Annelie Ädel & Randy Reppen (Eds.), Corpora and discourse: The challenges of different settings (pp. 57–92). John Benjamins: Amsterdam, Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Shalom, C. (2002). The academic conference: A forum for enacting genre knowledge. In E. Ventola, C. Shalom, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The language of conferencing (pp. 51–68). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  7. Thompson, S. E. (1994). Frameworks and contexts: A genre-based approach to analyzing lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MiyazakiMiyazakiJapan

Personalised recommendations