Abstract
Bacteria are able to produce and act in response to minute diffusible molecules called autoinducers (AI). These molecules amass as cell density enhancements and regulate the expression of set of genes to control diverse physiological functions by quorum sensing (QS). Several species of bacteria swap signal molecules to assist checking their own population densities. Until recently, it was contemplated that QS was an unusual phenomenon restricted to not many microbial species. Nevertheless, numerous novel exemplars of interbacterial and intrabacterial signaling mechanisms are documented. Amongst them, acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) and QS signaling systems are perhaps the best implicated diverse chemical languages used by both Gram-positive and Gram negative bacteria respectively. QS systems have primarily smudged the difference involving unicellular and multicellular life forms. Several QS systems exceptionally essential to medicine and agriculture. These QS microbes could be undoubtedly expensive tools for biologists to inquire and comprehend the progress of cooperation and cell to cell communication, wherein the realistic applications of this acquaintance will befall well-known in conjunction with basic acquaintance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hentzer, M., & Givskov, M. (2003). Pharmacological inhibition of quorum sensing for the treatment of chronic bacterial infections. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 112(9), 1300–1307.
Juhas, M., Eberl, L., & Tümmler, B. (2005). Quorum sensing: The power of cooperation in the world of Pseudomonas. Environmental Microbiology, 7(4), 459–471.
Miller, M. B., & Bassler, B. L. (2001). Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology, 55, 165–199.
Shrout, J. D., Chopp, D. L., Just, C. L., Hentzer, M., Givskov, M., & Parsek, M. R. (2006). The impact of quorum sensing and swarming motility on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation is nutritionally conditional. Molecular Microbiology, 62(5), 1264–1277.
von Bodman, S. B., Willey, J. M., & Diggle, S. P. (2008). Cell-cell communication in bacteria: united we stand. Journal of Bacteriology, 190(13), 4377–4391.
Waters, C. M., & Bassler, B. L. (2005). Quorum sensing: Cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 21, 319–346.
Zhang, L. H., & Dong, Y. H. (2004). Quorum sensing and signal interference: Diverse implications. Molecular Microbiology, 53(6), 1563–1571.
Acknowledgements
PVBC is grateful to Krishna University for providing necessary facilities to carry out the research work and for extending constant support.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pallaval Veera Bramhachari (2018). Introduction to Quorum Sensing Research in Diverse Microbial Systems. In: Pallaval Veera Bramhachari (eds) Implication of Quorum Sensing System in Biofilm Formation and Virulence. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2429-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2429-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2428-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2429-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)