Advertisement

Triaxial Tests to Characterize the Shear Strength Behavior of Mechanical Biological Treatment Waste in Hangzhou, China

  • Zhenying ZhangEmail author
  • Wenqiang Guo
  • Yingfeng Wang
  • Yuxiang Zhang
  • Hui Xu
  • Dazhi Wu
  • Kaifu Liu
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

Mechanical biological treatment (MBT) waste from the Tianziling landfill in Hangzhou, China, was collected for composition analysis, sample preparation, and conduction of triaxial unconsolidated-undrained and consolidated-undrained tests in an environmental geotechnical laboratory. The principal findings were as follows. (1) The component analysis indicated that the MBT waste comprised plastics, textiles, glass, lime soil, unidentified materials, and so on. (2) The triaxial compression test results showed that the deviatoric stress gradually increased with an increasing axial strain. The relationship between the deviatoric stress and axial strain took the form of a strain hardening curve. (3) The stress–strain relationship of the MBT waste conforms to the Duncan–Chang model. The ranges of the model parameters a and b were obtained. A power function relationship between the model parameters a and b and the confining pressure was established. (4) The values of the cohesion, internal friction angle, effective cohesion, and effective internal friction angle of the shear strength parameters were obtained. The cohesion c was 28.6 kPa, the internal friction angle φ was 23.3°, the effective cohesion c′ was 33.5 kPa, and the effective internal friction angle φ′ was 32.2°. These results can provide a theoretical basis for the stability analysis of MBT landfills.

Keywords

MBT Triaxial test Strain hardening Shear strength parameter Duncan–Chang model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Contract Nos. 51478436 and 51678532).

References

  1. 1.
    Qu Y, Zhang J, Zhu W, Pan T, Wang Q, Jin H (2015) Effect of biological treatment of municipal solid wastes. J Environ Eng 9(1):401–406Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu W, Zaixing Y, Meng F (2013) Land arrangement and utilization of closured waste landfill sites. Environ Sanit Eng 4(21):16–18Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xu S, Wang G, Wang Z (2010) Evaluation of tensile forces of geomembrane placed on waste landfill slope due to temperature variation and filling height. Rock and Soil Mechanics 31(10):3120–3124Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Powrie W, Beaven RP (1999) Hydraulic properties of household waste and implications for landfills. Geotech Eng 137(4):235–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kühle-Weidemeier M (2006) Geotechnical properties and emission behaviour of mechanically and biologically treated municipal solid waste landfill properties of MBT waste. Waste Consult International, LangenhagenGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fucale S, Jucá JFT, Muennich K (2015) The mechanical behavior of MBT-waste. Electron J Geotech Eng 20(13):5927–5937Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics (2014) CJJ/T 204-2013 technical specifications for soil and geotechnical test of domestic rubbish. China Architecture & Building Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feng S, Zhou Z, Chen Y, Zhan L (2005) Study on shear strength parameters of municipal solid waste. J Zhejiang Univ (Eng Sci) 39(7):987–991Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sivakumar Babu GL, Lakshmikanthan P, Santhosh LG (2015) Shear strength characteristics of mechanically biologically treated municipal solid waste (MBT-MSW) from Bangalore. Waste Manag 39:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhenying Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wenqiang Guo
    • 1
  • Yingfeng Wang
    • 1
  • Yuxiang Zhang
    • 1
  • Hui Xu
    • 1
  • Dazhi Wu
    • 1
  • Kaifu Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Zhejiang Sci-Tech UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations