In-Situ Generation of Active Oxidants in Permeable Reactive Barriers

  • Xu Yang
  • Jingbo Yang
  • Qinhai Hu
  • Min Xia
  • Zucheng WuEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


The in-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) is an effective technology for the remediation of organic contaminated groundwater. However, the requirement of adding oxidants, e.g. persulfate or H2O2, externally obviously reduces the economical efficiency of the overall treatment process. The method of in-situ generation of oxidants can avoid the disadvantage of conventional ISCO. Herein, our study indicates that the active chlorine can be effectively produced in a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) reactor, i.e. PRB-type two-compartment electrochemical device under the electric field. COD, i.e. chemical oxygen demand, as an indicator of organic pollutants in water was degraded by the in-situ electrogenerated active chlorine through the electrolysis of NaCl solution. The amount of COD removed in the anode chamber was 104 mg/L after operating the two-compartment device at 7.0 V for 12 h under the given working conditions, and COD detected in the cathode chamber was near zero, meaning all COD is removable in effluent. The results show that the in-situ electrogeneration of oxidants technology can provide a promising option for the treatment of groundwater organic pollutants.


In-situ chemical oxidation Active chlorine Two-compartment electrochemical device 


  1. 1.
    Hashim MA (2011) Remediation technologies for heavy metal contaminated groundwater. J Environ Manag 92(10):2355–2388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liang SH (2011) In situ oxidation of petroleum-hydrocarbon contaminated groundwater using passive ISCO system. Water Res 45(8):2496–2506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Seol Y (2003) A review of in situ chemical oxidation and heterogeneity. Environ Eng Geosci 9(1):37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Virkutyte J (2002) Electrokinetic soil remediation - critical overview. Sci Total Environ 289:97–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yeung AT (2006) Contaminant extractability by electrokinetics. Environ Eng Sci 23(1):202–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yeung AT (2011) A review on techniques to enhance electrochemical remediation of contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater 195:11–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chung HI (2007) A new method for remedial treatment of contaminated clayey soils by electrokinetics coupled with permeable reactive barriers. Electrochim Acta 52(10):3427–3431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martinez-Huitle CA (2015) Single and coupled electrochemical processes and reactors for the abatement of organic water pollutants: a critical review. Chem Rev 115(24):13362–13407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Han ZY (2015) Pollutant identification and quality assessment of groundwater near municipal solid waste landfills in China. China Environ Sci 35(9):2843–2852Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xu Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jingbo Yang
    • 2
  • Qinhai Hu
    • 2
  • Min Xia
    • 1
  • Zucheng Wu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Environmental EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations