Skip to main content

The South Asian Direction of “OBOR” Strategy: Geopolitical Pattern, Indian Difficulties and Breakthrough Path

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Annual Report on the Development of the Indian Ocean Region (2017)
  • 523 Accesses

Abstract

Currently, the world pattern has been suffering the collision of global problems one after another, which makes the global governance more closely linked with the international order. In this context, the great power strategy is still affected by the inertial thinking formed during the cold war. What’s worse, the occurrence of various changes and crisis brings the internal and external development strategy of a country into dilemma. As an important move to explore the means of global governance and seek the deepened economic and security cooperation with countries along the route, “OBOR” is a deterministic choice made by Chinese government under the conditions of a rapidly changing world pattern and a rise in the uncertainty of the surrounding environment. China is the largest neighboring country of South Asia. Although a huge potential market demand for South Asia means broad cooperation space, the cooperation between China and South Asia is faced with more obstacles compared to Southeast Asia, Central Asia and other regions. It is with the misunderstanding and contrasting points of view based on “geopolitical imagination” that result in the missing of cooperation opportunities. With the background of OBOR initiative, the strategic position, the breadth as well as the depth of cooperation in South Asia not only depend on the geopolitical structure itself and its position in the regional and world pattern, but also depends on China’s geopolitical structure, China’s strategic position and interest demands in South Asia as well as the interaction between China and South Asian countries. The Indian difficulties of “OBOR” in the South Asian direction, after all, consist in the Sino-Indian relations. The solution of this problem requires the joint efforts of both sides. We have reason to believe that as long as China and India are ready to put efforts and take action to strengthen communication in humanities and seek cooperation in the economic and security field, the “dividends” of cooperation will overflow to the political field and become the lubricant of political trust, which will eventually push forward the development of Sino-Indian bilateral relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jin Canrong: A Correct Understanding of the Influence of “The Belt and Road” Strategy on the International Situation, http://news.gdufs.edu.cn/Item/87426.aspx]. Chinese how to take precautions?

  2. 2.

    The issuance of The Documents Concerning the Vision and Action of Jointing Building “The Belt and Road”, World Wide Web. http://world.huanqiu.com/hot/2015-03/6037723.html.

  3. 3.

    The Launch of the Planning for the Six Economic Corridor in the “The Belt and Road”, China.Com. http://www.china.com.cn/opinion/think/2015-05/28/content_35680924.html.

  4. 4.

    Zhu Cuiping: The Relationship and Mutual Influence Between the Strategy of China, the United States and the South Asia, South Asia Studies, third edition of 2016, page one.

  5. 5.

    Zhang Wenmu: India and Indian Ocean—From the Perspective of China’s Geopolitics. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2015 edition, page 102.

  6. 6.

    A. J. Cottrell, R. M. Burrell editor: Indian Ocean: Importance in the Politics, Economic and Military, Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 1976 edition, page 303.

  7. 7.

    Zhang Wenmu: India and Indian Ocean—From the Perspective of China’s Geopolitics. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2015 edition, page 347.

  8. 8.

    Panikkar: India and Indian Ocean: On the Influence of Sea Power on the History of India, the world knowledge press, 1965 edition, page 8.

  9. 9.

    A. J. Cottrell, R. M. Burrell editor: Indian Ocean: Importance in the Politics, Economic and Military, Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 1976 edition, page 303.

  10. 10.

    Song Dexing: The Geopolitical Structure of South Asia and the Security Strategy of India, South Asia Studies, 2004 edition, page 21.

  11. 11.

    Yang Siling: “The Belt and Road Initiative”: The Analysis Perspective of the Relations Between Countries in South Asia, Study on India Ocean Economy, fifth issue of 2015, page 10.

  12. 12.

    Yang Xiaoping: Security Architecture of South Asia: Structural Imbalance and Fracture Integration, World Economy and Politics, second issue of 2012, page 80.

  13. 13.

    Robert D. Kaplan: The Future of the Indian Ocean and the Power of the United States, translated by Wu Zhaoli, Mao Yue, Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2013, page 6.

  14. 14.

    Zheng Di: On the Penetration of “Islamic State of South Asia, World Wide Web, http://world.huanqiu.com/hot/2015-09/7512883.html.

  15. 15.

    Li Jinke, Madewen: On the Causes of the Generation and Constant Development of National Separatist Movement in the Northeast India, International Forum, fourth issue of 2008, page 73.

  16. 16.

    Pan Islamism, http://baike.baidu.com/link?url=vVKxFxg8s0yH49mD-CQkaFFiElFqe0ig5b3upLakbOKd_uR_hPLe7X3jkRCo9i3xbyC9Ufmid7wcP2v7EzIpnLQtKSGLS3Fgya_mZXaoJPEPHsN0O_uhPPEQ9TKr1WH3acJPfkJo1VmgsFBbW6gxOa.

  17. 17.

    Zhao Lingmin: Behind the Religious Conflicts in India, Southern People Weekly, August 28, 2012.

  18. 18.

    Wang Yi: Build a New International Relations with Cooperation and Win-win as the Core, International Studies, third issue of 2015, page 2.

  19. 19.

    Song Dexing: The Geopolitical Structure of South Asia and the Security Strategy of India, South Asia Studies, first issue of 2004, page 20.

  20. 20.

    Zhu Cuiping: The Relationship and Mutual Influence Between the Strategy of China, America and the South Asia, South Asia Studies, third issue of 2016, page 2.

  21. 21.

    [America] Nicholas ·John· Spykman: Peace Geography, translated by Liu Yuzhi, Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1965, page 41.

  22. 22.

    [America] Zbigniew ·Brzezinski: The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geopolitical Strategy, translated by China Institute of International Studies, Shanghai Century Publishing Group, 2007 edition, page 34.

  23. 23.

    Wang Jisi: Great Power Strategy: Research and Reflection on the International Strategy, CITIC Publishing Group, published in 2016, page 109.

  24. 24.

    Huang Renwei: “The Belt and Road Initiative” is the Experimental Field for the New Concept of International Order, People.com.cn, http://world.people.com.cn/n/2015/0705/c1002-27255803.html.

  25. 25.

    Zhu Hong, An Ning: Geography Return of National Major Development Strategy: On the Geopolitical Significance of “The Belt and Road”, Tropical Geography, the fifth issue of the thirty-fifth volume of 2015, page 607.

  26. 26.

    Yan Xuetong: The Core of “The Belt and Road” is Strategic Relations Rather Than Traffic Facilities, International Herald Tribune, June 19 of 2015.

  27. 27.

    Shi Yinhong: The Promotion of “The Belt and Road” Construction Requires “Prudent” Mentality, People.com.cn, http://world.people.com.cn/n/2015/0705/c1002-27256546.html.

  28. 28.

    Li Xiangyang: Implement and Uphold the Right Idea of Moral and Profit of “The Belt and Road”, China.com.cn, http://www.china.com.cn/opinion/think/2017-02/27/content_40368781.htm.

  29. 29.

    Zhang Yunling: Focus on “The Belt and Road Initiative”, Chinese Social Sciences, http://www.cssn.cn/jjx/jjx_gd/201407/t20140731_1274694.shtml.

  30. 30.

    Zhu Cuiping: The Relationship and Mutual Influence in the Strategy Between China, America and South Asia, South Asia Studies, third issue of 2016, page 5.

  31. 31.

    Iran Threatened to Blockade the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic channel of World Petroleum Transport, Xinhuanet.com, http://news.sohu.com/20070108/n247489865.shtml.

  32. 32.

    Li Zhonglin: On the Monroe Doctrine of the Indian Version, Observer, http://www.guancha.cn/america/2010_12_17_52282.shtml.

  33. 33.

    Wang Jisi: Great Power Strategy: Research and Reflection on the International Strategy, CITIC Publishing Group, published in 2016, page 110.

  34. 34.

    Wang Jisi: Great Power Strategy: Research and Reflection on the International Strategy, CITIC Publishing Group, published in 2016, page 98.

  35. 35.

    Zhu Cuiping: The Relationship and Mutual Influence in the Strategy Between China, America and the South Asia, South Asia Studies, third issue of 2016, page 5.

  36. 36.

    Zhu Cuiping: The Dilemma and Strategic Choice of Indian Modi Government’s Policy Towards China, South Asian Studies, third issue of 2015, page 10.

  37. 37.

    Xiong Lili, Beyond the “Hegemonic Balance of Power—China’s Diplomacy in the International System of the Asia Pacific Region, Contemporary World and Socialism”, fourth issue of 2010, page 125.

  38. 38.

    Zheng Lei, Liu Zhigao: Space Pattern of Direct Investment of China Along “The Belt and Road”, Progress in Geography, fifth issue of 2015, page 565.

  39. 39.

    Li Xiao, Li Junjiu: “The Belt and Road” and the Reconstruction of Geopolitical Economic Strategy, World Economics and Politics, tenth issue in 2015, page 55.

  40. 40.

    The Speech Delivered by Ambassador Sun Weidong on the Seminar of “China Pakistan Economic Corridor: Opportunities and Challenges”, March 6, 2017, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/cepk/chn/zbgx/t1444827.htm.

  41. 41.

    Transportation Infrastructure is of Priority in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor CRCC and REG anticipate the layout, people.com.cn, http://ccnews.people.com.cn/n/2015/0423/c141677-26891468.html.

  42. 42.

    Lin Minwang: Is the Relationship Between China and India, off track? Observer, http://www.guancha.cn/LinMingWang/2016_11_04_379443.shtml.

  43. 43.

    The Release of the Joint Statement Between China and India, xinhuanet.com, http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2015-05-15/164231837337.shtml.

  44. 44.

    China-Bangladesh Economic and Trade Cooperation Forum Was Held in Dhaka, http://www.ccpit.org/Contents/Channel_3434/2016/1016/704160/content_704160.htm.

  45. 45.

    Zhu Zhenxin, Yang Xiao: On the Progress of “The Belt and Road” (Policy chapter&; Country chapter), http://www.360doc.com/content/17/0221/16/37879896_630868414.shtml.

  46. 46.

    The Embassy in Maldives Held the First Seminar of “The Belt and Road”, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/zwbd_673032/gzhd_673042/t1417621.shtml.

  47. 47.

    Nepal Prime Minister: “The Belt and Road” Initiative is in Line with the Interests of Both Sides, people.com.cn, http://world.people.com.cn/n1/2016/0322/c1002-28218284.html.

  48. 48.

    Pang Zhongying, One of the Obstacles for “The Belt and Road” is India, Observer, http://www.guancha.cn/PangZhongYing/2015_03_04_310947.shtml.

  49. 49.

    Ma Jiali, India is the Largest Resistance Country for China’s Construction of “The Belt and Road”. http://finance.ifeng.com/a/20150618/13786192_0.shtml.

  50. 50.

    Lou Chunhao: The Theoretic Logic of “The Belt and Road” and Its Enlightenment to the Cooperation Between China and South Asia, Study on India Ocean Economy, fourth issue of 2015, page 17.

  51. 51.

    Han Zhaoying, Tian Guangqiang: India’s Strategic Concerns for the Maritime Silk Road in thr Twenty-first Century, Modern International Relations, ninth issue of 2015, page 16.

  52. 52.

    See Other Points of View on Such Issues in: Long Xingchun: A Good Grasp of the Real Intention of “The Belt and Road”, World Wide Web, http://opinion.huanqiu.com/opinion_world/2015-07/7003501.html.

  53. 53.

    Ye Hailin: Must China Strive to Win India’s Support to Participate in the Twenty-first Century Maritime Silk Road, http://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1295387?key=%B3%C9%B6%BC%D6%C6%D7%F7%BC%D9%B1%CF%D2%B5%D6%A4.

  54. 54.

    Mao Yue: See the Diplomatic Thinking Mode of India from Its Cognition and Response to “The Belt and Road”, International Forum, first issue of 2017, page 41.

  55. 55.

    Hu Shisheng: India’s Security Cooperation with America and Japan Aims to Attract Investment for the Rise, http://phtv.ifeng.com/a/20150615/41111400_0.shtml.

  56. 56.

    Liu Siwei, Yang Wenwu: The Focus on Security in the India Ocean Issue and the Participation of China and India, South Asia Studies, third issue of 2015, page 82.

  57. 57.

    C. Raja Mohan, SAMUDRA MANTHAN: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific, Oxford University Press 2013, P16.

  58. 58.

    Shivshankar Menon, CHOICE: Inside the Making of India’s Foreign Policy, Penguin Random House India, 2016, P177.

  59. 59.

    Srikanth Kondapalli,“ China tosses maritime silk route bait to India”, https://www.indiawrites.org/china-tosses-maritime-silk-route-bait-to-india/.

  60. 60.

    Ashley J. Tellis, OPPORTUNITIES UNBOUND: Sustaining the transformation in U.S-Indian Relations,Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2013, P10.

  61. 61.

    Vijay Sakhuja, Xi Jinping and the Maritime Silk Road: The Indian Dilemma, http://www.ipcs.org/article/china/xi-jinping-and-the-maritime-silk-road-the-indian-dilemma-4662.html.

  62. 62.

    India Fears to be Surrounded by China and Strengthen the Military Cooperation with America and Japan, reference news network, http://www.cankaoxiaoxi.com/world/20151016/966929.shtml.

  63. 63.

    Zhu Cuiping: The Influence of Geopolitical Imagination of India on Sino Indian Relations, Study of the Indian Ocean Economy, 2016.

  64. 64.

    Manjeet S. Sardesi, India’s China Policy, “Engaging the World: Indian Foreign Policy since 1947”, edited by Sumit Ganguly, Oxford University Press, 2016, P186.

  65. 65.

    Raja Mohan [Print]: Mr. Modi’s World: The Expansion of India’s Sphere of Influence, translated by Zhu Cuiping, Yang Yishuang, Social Sciences Academic Press, Page 199.

  66. 66.

    Ye Hailin: The South Asian Policy of India and Its Influence on the Promotion of “The Belt and Road”, Study on Indian Ocean Economy, 2016, page 8.

  67. 67.

    David·Brewster: Strategic Influence of “The Belt and Road” Initiative on South Asia and the Indian Ocean Region, Study on Indian Ocean Economy, 2016, page 8.

  68. 68.

    Raja Mohan [Print]: Mr. Modi’s World: The Expansion of India’s Sphere of Influence, translated by Zhu Cuiping, Yang Yishuang, Social Sciences Academic Press, Page 122.

  69. 69.

    Zhao Gancheng: Indian Factor in China's Peripheral Strategy, International Outlook, 2014, page 43.

  70. 70.

    Liu Zongyi: The International Challenges and Strategic Choice of Tibet’s Integration into “The Belt and Road”, Study on Indian Ocean Economy, 2017, page 32.

  71. 71.

    Ye Hailin: India’s Policy on the South Asia and Its Influence on the Promotion of “The Belt and Road”, Study on Indian Ocean Economy, 2016, page 10.

  72. 72.

    Zhao Gancheng: The Shaping of the International Pattern in South Asia and the Choice of China, South Asia Studies, 2010, page 28.

  73. 73.

    Zhang Wenmu:India and Indian Ocean-Based on the Geopolitical Perspective, Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2015 edition, page 307.

  74. 74.

    Zhu Cuiping: The Dilemma and Strategic Choice of the Indian Modi Government’s Policy Toward China, South Asian Studies, 2015, page 10.

  75. 75.

    Zhu Cuiping: The Dilemma and Strategic Choice of the Indian Modi Government’s Policy Towards China, South Asian Studies, 2015, page 10.

  76. 76.

    Li Ziguo: The Driving Force of the people-to-people Bond in “The Belt and Road”, http://www.faobserver.com/NewsInfo.aspx?Id=11891.

  77. 77.

    K. Yohm: [Print] The Influence of Burma on the Geopolitics of the Bay of Bengal, Indian Area Research, 2014, page 46.

  78. 78.

    The Speech Delivered by Xi Jinping on the India World Affairs Council, xinhuanet.com, http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2014-09/19/c_1112539621.htm.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cuiping Zhu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Social Sciences Academic Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhu, C. (2018). The South Asian Direction of “OBOR” Strategy: Geopolitical Pattern, Indian Difficulties and Breakthrough Path. In: Rong, W., Zhu, C. (eds) Annual Report on the Development of the Indian Ocean Region (2017). Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2080-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2080-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2079-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2080-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics