Advertisement

Evaluation of Utilization of Wavelet Denoising Approach in Calibration of Hydrological Models

  • Maheswaran RathinasamyEmail author
  • Akash Choudary
  • Anuj Jaiswal
Conference paper

Abstract

Hydrological modeling can be very useful in studying the hydrology of the system and managing the water resources of the system in a sustainable way. Calibration of the hydrological model is an important step in model development and application. Calibration becomes difficult particularly when the input variables of the model is of poor quality and contaminated with noise. In order to improve the calibration and aid in modeling, denoising of the data has been used in past. In this study, a hydrological model for the Wainganga basin, India using SWAT coupled with wavelet denoising is developed. The model performance of the wavelet coupled SWAT model is compared with the simple SWAT model. For the purpose of the model calibration 8 years were used and the model validation was done using 3 years of data. The results from the study show that the wavelet-based denoising significantly improved the model performance and also aided model calibration.

Keywords

Wavelet denoising SWAT model Model calibration 

References

  1. 1.
    Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R.S., Williams, J.R.: Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development1. Wiley Online Library (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Srinivasan, R., Ramanarayanan, T.S., Arnold, J.G., Bednarz, S.T.: Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part II: model application1. Wiley Online Library (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, X., Srinivasan, R., Van Liew, M.: Multi-site calibration of the SWAT model for hydrologic modeling. Trans. ASABE 51(6), 2039–2049 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nourani, V., Rahimi, A.Y., Nejad, F.H.: Conjunction of ANN and threshold based wavelet denoising approach for forecasting suspended sediment load. Int. J. Manage. Inf. Technol. 3(1), 09–25 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, T.-W., Valdes, J.B.: Nonlinear model for drought forecasting based on a conjunction of wavelet transforms and neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng. 8(6), 319–328 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Partal, T., Kisi, M.: Long-term trend analysis using discrete wavelet components of annual precipitations measurements in Marmara region (Turkey). Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 31(18), 1189–1200 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Partal, T., Kisi. Wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model for precipitation forecasting. J. Hydrol. 342(1), 199–212 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shiri, J., Kisi, O.: Short-term and long-term streamflow forecasting using a wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model. J. Hydrol. 394(3), 486–493 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kisi, O., Shiri, J.: Precipitation forecasting using wavelet-genetic programming and wavelet-neuro-fuzzy conjunction models. Water Res. Manage. 25(13), 3135–3152 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adamowski, J., Chan, H.F.: A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting. J. Hydrol. 407(1), 28–40 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Belayneh, A., Adamowski, J.: Standard precipitation index drought forecasting using neural networks, wavelet neural networks, and support vector regression. Appl. Comput. Intell. Soft Comput. 6 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Özger, M., Mishra, A.K., Singh, V.P.: Long lead time drought forecasting using a wavelet and fuzzy logic combination model: a case study in Texas. J. Hydrometeorol. 13(1), 284–297 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J.R.: Soil and Water Assessment Tool User’s Manual Version 2000. GSWRL report 02-02, BRC report 02-06. Texas Water Resources Institute TR-192: College Station, TX. 438 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gassman, P.W., Reyes, M.R., Green, C.H., Arnold, J.G.: The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schwefel, H.-P., Rudolph, G.: Contemporary Evolution Strategies. Springer (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Santhi, C., et al.: Validation of the swat model on a large Rwer basin with point and nonpoint sources. Wiley Online Library (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grossmann, A., Morlet, J.: Decomposition of Hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 15(4), 723–736 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Donoho, D.L.: De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 41(3), 613–627 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Campisi-Pinto, S., Adamowski, J., Oron, G.: Forecasting urban water demand via wavelet-denoising and neural network models. Case study: city of Syracuse, Italy. Water Res. Manage. 26(12), 3539–3558 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maheswaran Rathinasamy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Akash Choudary
    • 2
  • Anuj Jaiswal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringMVGR College of EngineeringVizianagaramIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringIIT DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations