Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An EOQ Inventory Model with Remanufacturing and Dismantling for Parts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Operations Research in Development Sector

Part of the book series: Asset Analytics ((ASAN))

Abstract

A deterministic inventory model with constant demand and return on the base of economic order quantity (EOQ) is considered. We consider a firm that can manufacture new products and recover the value of a used product through remanufacturing with dismantling for parts. The firm provides product at a constant demand rate. Product consists of two parts. Each part is manufactured separately and placed in inventory, then two parts are assembled. The dismantling operation yields two spare parts. Products are returned according to the return rate, other products are disposed of. The returned product is dismantled for parts, any part is inspected whether it is usable or not and then is placed in inventory. Both parts are usable at the different rate. The usable parts are then remanufactured or directly reused, other parts are disposed of.

The work is supported by Saint Petersburg State University grant 15.61.208.2015.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akcali E, Cetinkaya S (2011) Quantitative models for inventory and production planning in closed-loop supply chains. Int J Prod Res 49(8):2373–2407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amelia L, Wahab DA, Che Haron CH, Muhamad N, Azhari CH (2009) Initiating automotive component reuse in Malaysia. J Clean Prod 17(17):1572–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andriolo A, Battini D, Grubbström RW, Persona A, Sgarbossa Fo (2014) A century of evolution from Harris's basic lot size model: survey and research agenda. Int J Prod Econ 155:16–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi D-W, Hwang H, Koh S-G (2007) A generalized ordering and recovery policy for reusable item. Eur J Oper Res 182:764–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dobos I, Richter K (2000) The integer EOQ repair and waste disposal model—further analysis. CEJOR 8(2):173–194

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dobos I, Richter K (2003) A production/recycling model with stationary demand and return rates. CEJOR 11:35–46

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dobos I, Richter K (2004) An extended production/recycling model with stationary demand and return rates. Int J Prod Econ 90(3):311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dobos I, Richter K (2006) A production/recycling model with quality consideration. Int J Prod Econ 104(2):571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferguson ME, Fleischmann M, Souza GC (2011) A profit-maximizing approach to disposition decisions for product returns. Decis Sci 42(3):773–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrão P, Amaral J (2007) Design for recycling in the automobile industry: new approaches and new tools. J Eng Des 17(5):447–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Govindan K, Shankar KM, Kannan D (2015) Application of fuzzy analytic network process for barrier evaluation in automotive parts remanufacturing towards cleaner production—a study in an Indian scenario. J Clean Prod 114:199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo Sh, Aydin G, Souza GC (2014) Dismantle or remanufacture? Eur J Oper Res 233:580–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasanov P, Jaber MY, Zolfaghari S (2012) Production, remanufacturing and waste disposal models for the case s of pure and partial backordering. Appl Math Model 36:5249–5261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jaber MY, El AMA (2009) The production, remanufacture and waste disposal model with lost sales. Int J Prod Econ 120(1):115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koh S-G, Hwang H, Sohn K-I, Ko C-S (2002) An optimal ordering and recovery policy for reusable items. Comput Ind Eng 43(1–2):59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Konstantaras I, Papachristos S (2006) Lot-sizing for a single-product recovery system with backordering. Int J Prod Res 44(10):2031–2045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Konstantaras I, Papachristos S (2008) A note on: Developing an exact solution for an inventory system with product recovery. Int J Prod Econ 111:707–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Konstantaras I, Scouri K (2010) Lot Sizing for a single product recovery system with variable setup numbers. Eur J Oper Res 203:326–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Konstantaras I, Scouri K, Jaber MY (2010) Lot sizing for a recoverable product with inspection and sorting. Comput Ind Eng 58:452–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu N, Kim Y, Hwang H (2009) An optimal operating policy for the production system with rework. Comput Ind Eng 56:874–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mabini MC, Pintston LM, Gelders LF (1992) EOQ type formulations for controlling repairable inventories. Int J Prod Econ 28:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nahmias S, Rivera H (1979) A deterministic model for a repairable item inventory system with a finite repair rate. Int J Prod Res 17(3):215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Richter K (1996) The EOQ repair and waste disposal model with variable setup numbers. Eur J Oper Res 96:313–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Richter K (1996) The extended EOQ repair and waste disposal model. Int J Prod Econ 45(1–3):443–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Richter K (1997) Pure and mixed strategies for the EOQ repair and waste disposal problem. OR Spectrum 19(2):123–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Richter K, Dobos I (1999) Analysis of the EOQ repair and waste disposal problem with integer setup numbers. Int J Prod Econ 59(1–3):463–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rogers DS, Tibben-Lembke RS (1998) Going backwards: reverse logistics trends and practices. University of Nevada, Reno, Center for Logistics Management

    Google Scholar 

  28. El Saadany AMA, Jaber MY (2008) The EOQ repair and waste disposal model with switching costs. Comput Ind Eng 55(1):219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. El Saadany AMA, Jaber MY (2010) A production, repair and waste disposal inventory model when returns are subject to quality and price considerations. Comput Ind Eng 58(3):352–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. El Saadany AMA, Jaber MY, Bonney M (2013) How many times to remanufacture? Int J Prod Econ 143:598–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schrady DA (1967) A deterministic inventory model for reparable items. Naval Res Logistics Q 14(3):391–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Souza GC (2013) Closed-loop supply chains: a critical review, and future research. Decis Sci 44(1):7–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Teunter RH (2001) Economic ordering quantities for recoverable item inventory systems. Naval Res Logistics 48(6):484–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tian J, Chen M (2014) Sustainable design for automotive products: dismantling and recycling of end-of-life vehicles. Waste Manag 34(2):458–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xia X, Govindan K, Zhu Q (2015) Analyzing internal barriers for automotive parts remanufacturers in China using grey-DEMATEL approach. J Clean Prod 87:811–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia

    Nadezhda Kozlovskaya, Nadezhda Pakhomova & Knut Richter

Authors
  1. Nadezhda Kozlovskaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nadezhda Pakhomova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Knut Richter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadezhda Kozlovskaya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India

    Arabinda Tripathy

  2. School of Management, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India

    Rabi Narayan Subudhi

  3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

    Srikanta Patnaik

  4. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, ICFAI Foundation of Higher Education University, Hyderabad, India

    Jyotiranjan Nayak

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kozlovskaya, N., Pakhomova, N., Richter, K. (2019). An EOQ Inventory Model with Remanufacturing and Dismantling for Parts. In: Tripathy, A., Subudhi, R., Patnaik, S., Nayak, J. (eds) Operations Research in Development Sector. Asset Analytics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1954-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation