MGNREGS, Elite and Access to Benefits



One of the important problems of self-targeted programmes is capture by elites and especially when the programme is as massive as MGNREGS. The chapter explores whether the MGNREG programme has been hampered with elite capture. If there is elite or programme capture, we will discuss how it takes place and who these elites are.


  1. Kumar, Parmod (2018). Employment Generation under MGNREGA: Spatial and Temporal Performance across States. In Bhattarai M., Viswanathan P., Mishra R., Bantilan C. (eds) Employment Guarantee Programme and Dynamics of Rural Transformation in India, India Studies in Business and Economics, Springer, Singapore.Google Scholar
  2. Manjula, R (2016). Decentralised Governance and Poverty Alleviation: A Study of MGNREGS in Karnataka, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Mysore.Google Scholar
  3. Government of India (2005). The National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005 (NREGA), Operational Guidelines 2008 (3rd edition), Ministry of Rural Development, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  4. Gaventa, John and Valderrama, Camilo (1999). Participation, Citizenship and Local Governance. Background note prepared for workshop on Strengthening Participation in Local Governance, Institute of Development Studies, Sussex, June 21–24.Google Scholar
  5. Crook, Richard C and James Manor (1998). Democracy and Decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Harish, B.G., N. Nagaraj, M.G. Chandrakanth, P.S. Srikantha Murthy, P.G. Chengappa and G. Basavaraj (2011). Impacts and implications of MGNREGA on Labour Supply and Income Generation for Agriculture in Central Dry Zone of Karnataka, Agricultural Economics Research Review, Vol. 24 (conference number), pp. 485–94.Google Scholar
  7. Berg, Erlend, D Rajasekhar and R Manjula (2013). Talking to Ghosts: Quantifying Forged Employment Records in NREG. Paper presented at CSAE Conference 2013 on ‘Economic Development in Africa’ held at University of Oxford, UK, during March 17–19.Google Scholar
  8. MoRD (2008). MGNREGA Guidelines document, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India, New Delhi. Accessed March 24, 2010.
  9. Bhatia, Bela and Jean Dreze (2006). Employment Guarantee in Jharkhand: Ground Realities, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XLI (29): 3198–3202, July 22nd.Google Scholar
  10. Rajasekhar, D, M Devendra Babu and R Manjula (2012). Are Checks and Balances in MGNREGS Effective? The Indian Journal of Social Work, 73 (4): 563–580, October.Google Scholar
  11. Rajasekhar, D, Salim Lakha and R Manjula (2013). How effective are Social Audits under MGNREGS? Lessons from Karnataka, Sociological Bulletin, 62 (3): 431–455, September – December.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dreze, Jean (2011). ‘Dantewada: Guarantee Withdrawn’, in Reetika Khera (ed.) The Battle for Employment Guarantee, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Manjula, R and D Rajasekhar (2015). Participation of Scheduled Caste Households in MGNREGS: Evidence from Karnataka, ISEC Working Paper 339, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru.Google Scholar
  14. Subbarao, Kalanidhi, Carlo del Ninno, Colin Andrews and Claudia Rodriguez-Alas (2013). Public Works as a Safety Net: Design, Evidence and Implementation, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  15. Zimmerman, Laura (2012). Labour market impacts of a large-scale public works Program: Evidence from Indian Employment Guarantee Scheme, IZA DP No. 6858, September.Google Scholar
  16. Pani, N. and Chidambaran G. Iyer (2011). Evaluation of the Impact of Processes in the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme in Karnataka, Bengaluru: National Institute of Advance Studies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Decentralisation and DevelopmentInstitute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC)BengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations