For faster and sustainable poverty reduction, there is a need for inclusive growth wherein people contribute to and benefit from economic growth. The importance of inclusive growth has been recognised both globally as well as in India. Although growth rates have gone up in India, the growth is not perceived to be inclusive for many groups such as Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), minorities and women as Indian society is stratified in terms of social, economic and human capital endowments. The Planning Commission of India has presented considerable evidence in support of the above and argued for inclusive growth in the country. It is now believed that rapid economic growth could exacerbate pre-existing inequalities rather than narrowing them in an inclusive way, and hence pro-poor and inclusive growth policies are needed.


Inclusive Growth Policies Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) Gram Panchayats Grama Sabhas Panchayat Raj Institutions (PRIs) 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Government of India (2006). Towards Faster and More Inclusive Growth: An Approach to the 11th Five-Year Plan. Planning Commission, Yojana Bhawan, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  2. Rajasekhar, D (2012). Local Self-Government in India: An Overview, Management Review, Vol 6, Issue 1, July.Google Scholar
  3. Heller, Patrick and Rao, Vijayendra (eds) (2015). Deliberation and Development: Rethinking the Role of Voice and Collective Action in Unequal Societies. The World Bank: Washington.Google Scholar
  4. Hirschman, Albert O (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organisations and States. Harvard University Press: Harvard.Google Scholar
  5. Lakha, Salim, Rajasekhar, D and Manjula, R (2015). Collusion, Cooption and Capture: Social accountability and Social Audits in Karnataka, India, Oxford Development Studies, 43 (3), pp 330–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rondinelli, Dennis A, Nellis John, R and Cheema G. Shabbir (1983). Decentralization in Developing Countries: A Review of Recent Experience. World Bank Staff Working Papers No. 581 and Mangament and Development Series No. 8. The World Bank: Washington.Google Scholar
  7. Blair, H. 2000 ‘Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries’, in World Development, January, Volume 28 Issue 1, pp. 21–39.Google Scholar
  8. Crook, Richard C and Alan Sturla Sverrisson (2001). Decentralisation and Poverty Alleviation in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis or, Is West Bengal Unique? IDS Working Paper 130. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
  9. Crook, Richard C and James Manor (1998). Democracy and Decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Manor, James (1999). The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralisation. Directions in Development Series. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  11. Rondinelli, Dennis, J S McCullough and R W Johnson (1989). Analyzing Decentralization Policies in Developing Countries: A Political Economy Framework. Development and Change (20): 1, pp. 57–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kulipossa (2004) Decentralization and Democracy in Developing Countries: An Overview. Development in Practice, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 768–779.Google Scholar
  13. Rondinelli, Dennis A (1983). Implementing Decentralisation Programmes in Asia: A Comparative Analysis. Public Administration and Development. Volume 3. pp. 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sharma, C K (2006). Decentralization Dilemma: Measuring the Degree and Evaluating the Outcomes. The Indian Journal of Political Science, Vol 67, No 1, pp. 49–64.Google Scholar
  15. Oates, Wallace E (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  16. Rajasekhar, D and Satapathy, Sachidananda (2007). The Functioning of Gram Panchayats in Karnataka. In T M Joseph (ed). Local governance in India: Ideas, Challenges and Strategies. Concept: New Delhi.Google Scholar
  17. UNDP (2003). Human Development Report – 2003, United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Aziz, Abdul (1993). Decentralised Planning: The Karnataka Experience. Sage: New Delhi.Google Scholar
  19. Duflo, Esther, Hanna, Rema and Ryan, Stephen P. (2012). Incentives Work: Getting Teachers to Come to School. American Economic Review; 102 (4): 1241–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Blair, Harry (1998). Spreading Power to the Periphery: An Assessment of Democratic Local Governance. USAID Program and Operations Assessment Report No. 21.Google Scholar
  21. Gaventa, John and Valderrama, Camilo (1999). Participation, Citizenship and Local Governance. Background note prepared for workshop on Strengthening Participation in Local Governance, Institute of Development Studies, Sussex, June 21–24.Google Scholar
  22. Lieten G K (1996). Panchayats in Western Uttar Pradesh: ‘Namesake’ Members. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 31 (39). pp. 2700–2705.Google Scholar
  23. Kudva, Neema (2003). Engineering Elections: The Experience of Women in “Panchayat Raj” in Karnataka, India. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 445–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Inbanathan, Anand (2003). Affirmative Action and Dalits: Political Representation in Panchayats. ISEC Working Paper No. 138, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru, India.Google Scholar
  25. Inbanathan, Anand and Sivanna, N (2010). Scheduled Castes, Legitimacy and Local Governance: Continuing Social Exclusion in Panchayats. ISEC Working Paper No. 257, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru, India.Google Scholar
  26. Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra and Duflo, Esther (2004). Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomised Policy Experiment in India. Econometrica. Vol. 72 (5): 1409–1443.Google Scholar
  27. Rajasekhar and Manjula (2011). Community Lighting at What Cost? Streetlight Services by Gram Panchayats in Karnataka. Bengaluru: Institute for Social and Economic Change (mimeo).Google Scholar
  28. Pal, Mahi (1998a). Women in Panchayats: Experiences of a Training Camp, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 33(4): 150–152.Google Scholar
  29. Pal, Mahi (1998b). Panchayats in Election Manifestos: A Comparative Analysis. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 33 (12): 631–632.Google Scholar
  30. Pal, Sudha (1998). Pradhanis in the New Panchayats: Field Notes from Meerut District. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 33 (18): 1009–1010.Google Scholar
  31. Mankar D M, L V Hirevenknagoudar and L Manjunath (2005). Knowledge Level and Role Performance of Women Panchayat Members About Improved Agriculture. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol. 18 (2): 193–197.Google Scholar
  32. Vijayalakshmi, V (2007). Differences and Identities: Women and Political Participation. In T M Joseph (ed.) Local Governance in India: Ideas, Challenges and Strategies, Concept Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  33. Government of India (2005). The National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005 (NREGA), Operational Guidelines 2008 (3rd edition), Ministry of Rural Development, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, Craig, Priya Deshingkar and Daniel Start (2003). Grounding the State: Poverty, Inequality and the Politics of Governance in India’s Panchayats, Working Paper 226, Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London.Google Scholar
  35. Babu M. Devendra, D Rajasekhar, B S Sreekantaradhya, (2011), Comprehensive District Development Plan for Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007–12), (Chikballapur District), Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru.Google Scholar
  36. Beseley, Timothy, Pande, Rohini and Rao, Vijayendra (2008). The Political Economy of Gram Panchayats in South India. In Gopal K. Kadekodi, Ravi Kanbur and Vijayendra Rao (eds) Development in Karnataka: Challenges of Governance, Equity and Empowerment. Academic Foundation: New Delhi.Google Scholar
  37. Issac, Thomas and Heller, Patrick (2003). Decentralisation, Democracy and Development: People’s Campaign for Decentralised Planning in Kerala. In Archon Fung and Erik Olin Wright (Eds). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Verso: London.Google Scholar
  38. Rajasekhar, D, M Devendra Babu and R Manjula (2012a). Are Checks and Balances in MGNREGS Effective? The Indian Journal of Social Work, 73 (4): 563–580, October.Google Scholar
  39. Rajasekhar, D, M Devendra Babu and R Manjula (2012b). Elite Capture in Grama Panchayats of Karnataka, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru, (Mimeo).Google Scholar
  40. Hansen, Susanne Dam (1999). NGO’s Role in Increasing People’s Participation in Local Decentralised Government. In D. Rajasekhar (ed.) Decentralised Government and NGOs: Issues, Strategies and Ways Forward, New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  41. Government of Karnataka (2002). High Power Committee for Redressel of Regional Imbalances (HPCFRRI), Government of Karnataka.Google Scholar
  42. Vadivelu, G Ananda (2008). Choosing ‘not’ to Participate: Evidence from Drought Prone Area Programme (DPAP) in Chitradurga, Karnataka. In Gopal K Kadekodi, Ravi Kanbur and Vijayendra Rao (eds.) on ‘Development in Karnataka: Challenges of Governance, Equity and Empowerment’, New Delhi: Academic Foundation.Google Scholar
  43. Asthana, Anand N (2008). Decentralisation and Corruption: Evidence from Drinking Water Sector, Public Administration and Development, 28: 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Alok, V N (2011). Role of Panchayat Bodies in Rural Development since 1959. Theme paper for 55th Members’ Annual Conference. Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  45. UNDP (n.d). Decentralisation in India: Challenges and Opportunities. HDRC Discussion paper series 1, UNDP, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  46. Falleti T G (2005). ‘A Sequential Theory of Decentralization: Latin American cases in Comparative Perspective’, The American Political Science Review, 99 (3): 327–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Deininger, Klaus, Songqing Jin, Hari K Nagarajan and Fang Xia (2015). Does Female Reservation affect long-term political outcomes? Evidence from rural India. The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 51, Issue 1.Google Scholar
  48. Ban, Radu and Rao, Vijayendra (2008). Tokenism or Agency? The Impact of Women Reservations on village democracies in south India. Economic Development and Cultural Change 56 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jayal, Niraja Gopal (2006). Engendering local democracy: The Impact of quotas for women in India’s Panchayats. Democratization, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, pp. 15–35.Google Scholar
  50. Robinson, Mark (1998), `Democracy, Participation, and Public Policy: The Politics of Institutional Design’, in Mark Robinson and Gordon White (Eds.) (1998), The Democratic Developmental State: Political and Institutional Design, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Kadekodi, Gopal, Kanbur, Ravi and Rao, Vijayendra (2007). Governance and the `Karnataka Model of Development. Economic and Political Weekly. 42 (8).Google Scholar
  52. Manjula, R, Rajasekhar D and Devendra Babu, M (2018). Quality of Governance in Grama Panchayats: Evidence from Karnataka. Journal of Rural Development (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Decentralisation and DevelopmentInstitute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC)BengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations