Abstract
The interline power flow controller (IPFC) has two converter/inverters connected back to back with DC link. One of the converter is knows as series inverter which improve voltage quality of the load bus and second inverter known as shunt converter is used to compensate the reactive power of load and minimize the losses of the transmission line. In this work, the impact of the IPFC is seen in IEEE-3 Bus systems. The first one is connected between Load Bus or PQ-Bus and the Generating Bus or PV-Bus to inject voltage at certain angle. And it compensates reactive demand of the load using novel control approach. Moreover, the second converter of the IPFC is connected between Slack Bus and Load Bus to inject the compensating current using the Instantaneous Symmetrical Voltage Component Theory (ISVCT) based control algorithm. And it compensates the reactive demand of the load. The impact assessment of the IPFC on IEEE-3 Bus system is verified using MATPOWER.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
N.G. Hingorani, Introducing custom power. IEEE Spectr. 32(6), 41–48 (1995)
H. Fujita, H. Akagi, The unified power quality conditioner, the integration of series- and shunt-active filters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 12(2), 315–322 (1998)
A.K. Mehrdad, S. Soleymani, S.B. Mozafari, S.M. Hosseini, An approach to optimal allocation of SVC in power systems connected to DFIG wind farms based on maximization of voltage stability and system loadability. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 29(5), 2147–2157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3233/ifs-151690
S. Vahid, Z. Masoud, O. Mahmoud, An intelligent method to reduce losses in distribution networks using self-adaptive harmony search algorithm. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 30(3), 1393–1402 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3233/ifs-152052
H. Mehrjerdi, A. Ghorbani, Adaptive algorithm for transmission line protection in presence of UPFC. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 91, 10–19 (2017)
A. Vinkovic, R. Mihalic, A current-based model of an IPFC for Newton-Raphson power flow. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 79, 1247–1254 (2009)
M. Noroozian, L. Angquist, M. Ghandari, G. Andarson, Use of UPFC for optimal power flow. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 12(4), 1629–1634 (1997)
B. Bhattacharyya, S. Kumar, Approach for the solution of transmission congestion with multi-type FACTS devices. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 10(11), 2802–2809 (2016)
B. Singha, V. Mukherjee, P. Tiwari, Genetic algorithm optimized impact assessment of optimally placed DGs and FACTS controller with different load models from minimum total real power loss viewpoint. Energy Build. 126, 194–219 (2016)
A.Q. Ansari, B. Singh, M. Hasan, Algorithm for power angle control to improve power quality in distribution system using unified power quality conditioner. IET GTD 9, 1439–1447 (2015)
U. Koteswara Rao, M.K. Mishra, A new control strategy for load compensation in power distribution system, in International Conference on Power Systems, 2009, ICPS ‘09, Kharagpur, 2009, pp. 1–6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ansari, A.Q., Hasan, M., Islam, N. (2019). An Approach to Minimize the Transmission Loss and Improves the Voltage Profile of Load Bus Using Interline Power Flow Controller (IPFC). In: Malik, H., Srivastava, S., Sood, Y., Ahmad, A. (eds) Applications of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 698. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1819-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1819-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1818-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1819-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)