Abstract
Design-Expert V9 software was used to predict the cutting parameters that had an important effect for a particular response. Since the surface roughness for CFRP and Al2024 was recorded as two different responses, the analysis was conducted separately. The obtained results from the experiment are listed in Table 4.1 which is then used for further analysis using Design-Expert V9 software. The input variables were spindle speed, feed rate, and depth of cut; meanwhile, the responses were surface roughness for CFRP and Al2024. The analysis began with the analysis of CFRP machined surface and then followed by Al2024 machined surface.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Reference
Hills, R. G., Cruces, L., & Trucano, T. G. (1999). Statistical validation of engineering and scientific models : Background. Retrieved from http://www4.ncsu.edu/~rsmith/Hills-1.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mohamed, S.B., Rashid, R.A., Muhamad, M., Ismail, J. (2019). Learning from the Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Project. In: Down Milling Trimming Process Optimization for Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Plastic. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1804-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1804-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1803-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1804-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)