Advertisement

Growing Through Partnerships

  • Linda HobbsEmail author
  • Coral Campbell
Chapter

Abstract

While partnerships in teacher education are essential for ensuring adequately preparing teachers, the effects of these partnerships are difficult to capture. The STEPS project analysed five models of a school-based approach to teaching primary science education. These five partnership models were developed to give pre-service teachers a supported, authentic experience of teaching science to school children. The effects of these teaching opportunities for pre-service teachers are explored in this chapter as “growth”: where growth occurs, how this is evidenced, and what is needed to enable growth. A series of vignettes documenting the experiences of pre-service teachers, teacher educators, teachers and principals were developed from interview data, from which a series of themes emerged. A meta-analysis of these themes revealed some common elements across the vignettes that seemed to mark the professional growth of the various stakeholders in terms of shaping their identity and confidence, praxis and relationships. Growth must be evident, measured and documented if the effort to initiate and maintain such partnerships is going to be worthwhile. The question of how to measure growth occurring as a result of partnerships is interrogated in this chapter through the use of data and is linked with current research literature. A growth model is presented, as is an accompanying set of variables that can be used to measure the effects of education-based partnerships.

Keywords

Partnerships Evidence of growth Science teacher education Interpretive framework Primary science Pre-service teachers Identity Confidence Praxis Relationships Enabling growth 

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandenburg, R. (2008). Powerful pedagogy: Self-study of a teacher educator’s practice. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.Google Scholar
  6. Darby, L. (2005). Science students’ perceptions of engaging pedagogy. Research in Science Education, 35, 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should know and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Department of Education. (2006). Principles of learning and teaching. Department of Education. Accessible http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/support/Pages/polt.aspx.
  9. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  10. Donaldson, G. (2011). Scotland’s future: Report of a review of teacher education in Scotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  11. Gee, J. P. (2010). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Goodlad, J. I. (1993). School-university partnerships and partner schools. Educational Policy, 7(1), 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herbert, S., & Hobbs, L. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ views of school-based approaches to pre-service primary science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 48, 777–809.Google Scholar
  14. Hobbs, L. (2013). Teaching ‘out-of-field’ as a boundary crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 271–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobbs, L., Campbell, C., Chittleborough, G., Herbert, S., Jones, M., Redman, C., et al. (2015). Interpretive framework. Available http://www.stepsproject.org.au.
  16. Hobbs, L., & Kelly, L. (2016). The heart of the educator: Aesthetic experience shaping knowledge, identity and passion. In A. Bellocchi, K. Otrel-Cas, & C. Quigley (Eds.), Beyond cognition in science education: Considering the role of emotions, well-being, and aesthetics (pp. 55–82). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Hooley, N. (2011). Steer clear of clinical model for education. Campus Review. Retrieved from http://www.campusreview.com.au/2011/06/steer-clear-of-clinical-model-for-teacher-education.
  18. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Vocational Training. (2007). Top of the class: Report of the inquiry into teacher education. Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=evt/teachereduc/report/fullreport.pdf.
  19. Howitt, C. (2007). Pre-service elementary teachers’ perceptions of factors in an holistic methods course influencing their confidence in teaching science. Research in Science Education, 37(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, M. (2008). Collaborative partnerships: A model for science teacher education and professional development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3).Google Scholar
  22. Jones, M., Hobbs, L., Kenny, J., Campbell, C., Chittleborough, G., Gilbert, A., et al. (2016). Successful university-school partnerships: An interpretive framework to inform partnership practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 108–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kruger, T., Davies, A., Eckersley, B., Newell, F., & Cherednichenko, B. (2009). Effective and sustainable university-school partnerships: Beyond determined efforts by inspired individuals. Canberra: AITSL.Google Scholar
  24. Lynch, D., & Smith, R. (2012). Teacher education partnerships: An Australian research-based perspective. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(11), 132–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lynch, D., & Smith, R. (2013). Teachers for the future: An unmet need. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity an Change, 1(1). Downloaded http://www.ijicc.net/images/issue1volume1/lynch%20and%20smith%20v1i1%20final.pdf.
  26. Palmer, D., Dixon, J., & Archer, J. (2015). Changes in science teaching self-efficacy among primary teacher education students. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(12), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Redman, C. (2014). The Melbourne Graduate School of Education Master of Teaching. In M. Jones & J. Ryan (Eds.), Successful teacher education: Partnerships, reflective practice and the place of technology (pp. 11–29). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rowley, G., Weldon, P., Kleinhenz, E., & Ingvarson, L. (2013). School-university partnerships in initial teacher preparation: An evaluation of the School Centres for Teaching Excellence initiative in Victoria. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  30. Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG). (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teacher. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
  31. Tytler, R. (2003). A window for a purpose: Developing a framework for describing effective science teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 33(3), 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tytler, R. (2009). School Innovation in Science: Improving science teaching and learning in Australian schools. International Journal of Science Education, 31(13), 1777–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van Manen, J. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London: The Althouse Press.Google Scholar
  34. Walsh, M. E., & Backe, S. (2013). School-university partnerships: Reflections and opportunities. Peabody Journal of Education, 88(5), 594–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ure, C. (2009). Practicum partnerships: Exploring models of practicum organisation in teacher education for a standards based profession. Final Report. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/system/files/resources/ALTCFinalReport_PracticumPartnerships_Electronic.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deakin UniversityWaurn PondsAustralia

Personalised recommendations