This chapter draws on the insights in previous chapters to present two visions for the use of partnerships in teacher education and the applicability of our STEPS Interpretive Framework as a language to inform and describe partnership work, and to show how education-focused partnerships can be set up to work most effectively in a range of other contexts. A discussion follows of how this framework contributes to the literature on partnerships follows as do some suggestions for limitations of their use.
KeywordsPartnership model Interpretive Framework Educational and non-educational contexts Limitations
- ACEN (2015). National strategy in work integrated learning in university education. Australian Collaborative Education Network. Retrieved September 2015 from http://cdn1.acen.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/National-WIL-Strategy-in-university-education-032015.pdf.
- AITSL. (2017). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs. Guideline: Primary specialisation (Program Standard 4.4). Melbourne: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Available online from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/tools-resources/resource/guideline-primary-specialisation.
- Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2015). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia, standards and procedures. Melbourne: AITSL.Google Scholar
- Kenny, J., Hobbs, L., Speldewinde, C., Jones, M., Campbell, C., Gilbert, A., et al. (2015). Establishing school university partnerships to teach science-does what worked for us work for you? Proceedings of the European Science Education Research Association: Engaging learners for a sustainable future (pp. 2029–2040, 31 August–4 September 2015), Helsinki, Finland. ISBN 978-951-51-1541-6.Google Scholar
- Kruger, T., Davies, A., Eckersley, B., Newell, F., & Cherednichenko, B. (2009). Effective and sustainable university-school partnerships: Beyond determined efforts by inspired individuals. Canberra: Teaching Australia–Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Limited.Google Scholar
- Peach, D., Cates, C., Jones, J., Lechleiter, H., & Ilg, B. (2011). Responding to rapid change in higher education: Enabling university departments responsible for work related programs through boundary spanning. Journal of Cooperative Education and Internships, 45(1), 94–106. This file was downloaded from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/46451/.
- Sveningsson, S., & Alvesson, M. (2003). Managing managerial identities: Organizational fragmentation. Discourse and Identity Struggle. Human Relations, 56(10), 1163–1193.Google Scholar
- Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG). (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Retrieved from http://www.studentsfirst.gov.au/teacher-education-ministerial-advisory-group.
- TEQSA. (2016). Work integrated learning guidance note. The Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA). Available online from http://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/GuidanceNote_WorkIntegratedLearning%201.0.pdf.