Abstract
This chapter considers how the Interpretive Framework was applied to Waikato University’s Community University–School Partnership (CUSP) program, retrospectively. As a well-documented partnership program, the Interpretive Framework was applied to the aspects of the project to see how these aligned. As well as highlighting the synergies between the Interpretive Framework and the CUSP, there were a number of differences which arose and these are discussed as considerations of adding further complexity to the Interpretive Framework.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, J. M. (2011). Stakeholders perspectives of the nature and role of assessment during practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 742–750.
Cobb, D., & Harlow, A. (2017). Rethinking the Associate Teacher and pre-service teachers relationships: Powerful possibilities for co-learning partnerships. In R. McNae, & B. Cowie (Eds.), Realising Innovative Partnership in Educational Research. Theories and Methodologies for Collaboration (pp. 61–66). Sense Publishers.
Cooper, B., & Grudnoff, L. (2017). Redesigning authentic collaborative practicum partnerships: Learnings from case studies from two New Zealand Universities. In M. Peters, B. Cowie, & I. Menter (Eds.), A companion to research in teacher education (pp. 223–236). Singapore: Springer.
Haigh, M., & Ell, F. (2014). Consensus and dissensus in mentor teachers’ judgments of readiness to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 1–12.
Harlow, A., Cooper, B., & Cowie, B. (2014). Collaborative University School Partnerships Research Brief: Hamilton—The first-year practicum experience, 2013. (pp. 1–11). [Research brief]. http://www.waikato.ac.nz/wmier/researchprojects/collaborative-university-school-partnerships/_recache. (The University of Waikato).
Harlow, A. with Short, C., Waititi, C., Maubach, C., Price, G., Cheesman, S., & Aitken, V. (2014). Collaborative University School Partnerships Research Brief: ARTS in CUSP—2013.
Hobbs, L., Campbell, C., Chittleborough, G., Herbert, S., Jones, M., Redman, C., Kenny, Gilbert, A. (2015). Interpretive Framework. Available http://www.stepsproject.org.au.
Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2010). Constructing CoRes—A strategy for building PCK in pre-service science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 341–355.
Hume, A., & Furness, J. (2017). A School-Researcher Partnership with Pragmatism at its Core. In R. McNae & B. Cowie (Eds.), Realising Innovative Partnerships in Educational Research. Educational Partnerships and Collaborations: SensePublishers, Rotterdam.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (2009a). Reading and writing standards for years 1–8. Wellington: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (2009b). Mathematics standards for years 1–8. Wellington: Learning Media.
Patton, M. (2011). State of the art and practice of developmental evaluation answers to common and recurring questions. New York: The Guilford Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cooper, B., Cowie, B., Campbell, C. (2018). A New Zealand Collaborative University–School Partnership: Applying the STEPS Framework. In: Hobbs, L., Campbell, C., Jones, M. (eds) School-based Partnerships in Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1795-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1795-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1794-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1795-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)