Skip to main content

Green Crimes as a Dark Side of Globalization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Globalization Conundrum—Dark Clouds behind the Silver Lining

Abstract

Globalization includes the increasingly global effects of human activity on the environment. It directly contributes to the destruction and degradation of Earth’s resources, with much of what we rely on for our livelihoods at risk from a new threat: green crimes (air pollution, water pollution, deforestation, and species declines and animal rights). Can green crimes be analyzed in terms of regions? In our opinion, yes, they must be. In addition to humans’ conflicts about these issues, governments ignore their own environmental regulations. In this study, green crimes were addressed using spatial econometrics; the GeoDa packet program was used to analyze and compare regions of the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aertgeerts, R., & Angelakis, A. (2003). State of the art report health risks in aquifer recharge using reclaimed water. World Health Organization Publication, SDE/WSH/03.08: Denmark. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/wastewater/wsh0308pref.pdf.

  • Annoni, P., & Kozovska, K. (2010). EU regional competitiveness index 2010. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: methods and models: Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishians.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial indicators.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x. Accessed 10 May 2018.

  • Axworthy, A. L., & Ross, F. K. (2006). The World Urban Forum 2006 Vancouver working group discussion paper. The Liu Institute for Global Issues at the University of British Columbia: England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykal, H., & Baykal, T. (2008). Küreselleşen Dünyada Çevre Sorunları. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(9), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). From industrial society to the risk society: Questions of survival, social structure and ecological enlightenment. Theory, Culture & Society, 9(2), 97–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (1995). The use and abuse of animals in criminology: A brief history and current review. Social Justice, 22(1), 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Can, T. (Ed.). (2013). Ormanın Kitabı. World Wildlife Fund–Türkiye, İstanbul. Retrieved from http://d2hawiim0tjbd8.cloudfront.net/downloads/wwf_ormanin_kitabi_web.pdf.

  • Chen, Y. (2008). On the four types of weight functions for spatial contiguity matrix. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 5(2), 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A. D., & Ord, J. K. (1973). Spatial autocorrelation. London: Pion. Progress in Human Geography, 19(2), 245–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A. D., & Ord, J. K. (1981). Spatial autocorrelation. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dönmez, B. (2013). Hayvanlara yönelik işlenen suçlar [Special issue]. Journal of Yaşar University, 8(21), 903–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, N., Stolton, S., Belokurov, A., Krueger, L., Lopoukhine, N., MacKinnon, K, … & Sekhran, N. (Eds.). (2010). Natural solutions: Protected areas helping people cope with climate change. IUCNWCPA, TNC, UNDP, WCS, The World Bank, and the World Wildlife Fund: Gland, Switzerland, Washington DC, and New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Naschie, M.S. (2000). On the unification of heterotic strings theory. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 11(4), 2397–2408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getis, A. (2009). Spatial weights matrices. Geographical Analysis, 41(4), 404–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, C., Gore, M., McGarrell, E., & Rivers, L. (2010). Introducing conservation criminology: Towards interdisciplinary scholarship on environmental crimes and risks. British Journal of Criminology, 50(1), 124–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagget, P. (1977). Locational analysis in human geography. Geographical Review, 57(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haining, R. P. (2009). Spatial autocorrelation and the quantitative revolution. Geographical Analysis, 41(4), 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, M., & White, R. (1998). Crime, ecophilosophy and environmental harm. Theoretical Criminology, 2(3), 345–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. (2018). IUCN red list of threatened species summary statistics. Retrieved from http://www.iucnredlist.org/about/summary-statistics/.

  • Keleş, R., & Hamamcı, C. (2005). Çevre politikası. Ankara: İmge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khokhar, T., & Tabary, M. E. (2016). Five forest figures for the international day of forests. The World Bank The Data Blog. Retrieved fromhttp://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/five-forest-figures-international-day-forests.

  • Lemieux, A., & Clarke, R. (2009). The international ban on ivory sales and its effects on elephant poaching in Africa. British Journal of Criminology, 49(4), 451–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Sage J (1999)The Theory and Practice of Spatial Econometrics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1990). The greening of criminology: A perspective on the 1990s. Critical Criminologist, 2(3–4), 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, N. (1998). A green field for criminology? A proposal for a perspective. Theoretical Criminology, 2(2), 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, N., Brisman, A., & Beirne, P. (2013). A guide to a green criminology. In N. South & A. Brisman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of green criminology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • TERI—The Energy and Resources Institute. (2015). Air pollution and health. Discussion paper by The Energy and Resources Institute: New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W.R. (1970). A Computer movie simulating urban growth in the detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W.R. (2004). Thirty five years of computer cartograms. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(1), 58–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (2016). World development indicators 2016. Washington, DC: The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0683-4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (2018). World bank open data. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org.

  • UNESCO, Universal Declaration of Animal Rights 17-10-1978. Retrieved from http://www.esdaw.eu/unesco.html.

  • Walters, R. (2010). Eco crime. In J. Muncie, D. Talbot, & R. Walters (Eds.), Crime: Local and global. Willan: Cullompton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellsmith, M. (2010). The applicability of crime prevention to problems of environmental harm: A consideration of illicit trade in endangered species. In R. White (Ed.), Global environmental harm: Criminological perspectives. Willan: Cullompton.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2008). Crimes against nature: Environmental criminology and ecological justice. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (Ed.). (2009). Environmental crime: A reader. Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2010). Globalization and environmental harm. In R. White (Ed.), Global environmental harm: Criminological perspectives. Willan: Cullompton.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2011). Transnational environmental crime: Toward an eco-global criminology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Group (2018). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org.

  • World Health Organization. (2018). Global health observatory data. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/gho/phe/en.

  • World Water Assessment Program. (2012). The United Nations World Water Development Report 4: Managing water under uncertainty and risk. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Water Assessment Program. (2018). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2018: Nature-based solutions for water. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Wildlife Fund—Turkey. (2015). İklim değişikliğinin türler üzerindeki etkisi. Retrieved from http://d2hawiim0tjbd8.cloudfront.net/downloads/iklim_degisikliginin_turler_uzerindeki_etkisi_raporu_1.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Işın Çetin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Çetin, I., Keser, H.Y., Ay, S. (2019). Green Crimes as a Dark Side of Globalization. In: Chakrabarti, G., Sen, C. (eds) The Globalization Conundrum—Dark Clouds behind the Silver Lining. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1727-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics