Abstract
Economists work with theories and models to depict the correlation between supply and demand. This all happens in a world where the provision of goods and services necessitates efforts and costs. In cooperation with economists—or on their own—economic geographers and spatial scientists add the element of space in their visions and models. They know that distances have to be covered in order to bring any good and most services to the consumer. Classical researches, namely H. von Thuenen, A. Weber, A. Loesch, and more recent scientists like E. Ullman, R. Abler, J. Adams and P. Gould and P. Dicken thus developed a vision of interactions in space, where transportation costs played a notable role. They helped to define optimal locations for producers (and consumers) in a homogenous or variably equipped economic landscape. A current look at such models proposed in the last 150 years gives the impression that classical and neoclassical spatial models have lost their relevance. Shrinking transportation costs and even a “collapse of time and space” have ironed out spatial differences and the protective effects of previous high transportation costs. Is this the end of all distributive and delimitating models which were based on distance and transport efforts, as voiced by some of today’s analysts? A solution comes from the findings of modern marketing approaches. Our Fig. 1.1 combines the marginal costs concept, based on the economies of scale, with the reality of segmented markets. Protected or trusted items fetch a better price, and this generally happens in the relative proximity to the producer. In contrast, when considering the economies of scale the supplier will be able to cope with lower revenues per unit in more distant markets. Transportation costs still do exist, but they are hidden behind current market strategies. With a coming perspective of increasing transportation costs again, resulting from rising energy prices, the relevance of transport- and trade-off models may appear again in the real world of producers and consumers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abler, R., J. Adams, and P. Gould. 1971. Spatial organization—The geographer’s view of the world. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Alonso, W. 1964. Location and land use. Towards a general theory of land rent. Cambridge, MA: HUP.
Beckmann, M.J. 2009. The pure theory of spatial markets. In New directions in regional economic development, ed. C. Karlsson et al., 34–46. Heidelberg.
Bozicnik, S., and K. Schliephake. 2005. Freight transport innovations of European railways. PROMET Traffic – Traffico (Zagreb) 17(1): 33–41.
Capello, Roberta. 2009. Space, growth and development. In Handbook of regional growth and development theories, ed. R. Capello, P. Nijkamp et al., 31 ff. Cheltenham.
Christaller, W. 1966. Central places in southern Germany. Englewood Cliffs, NJ (first published in German in 1933).
Granovetter, M., and R. Swedberg (eds.). 1992. The sociology of economic life. Oxford: OUP.
Hotelling, Harold. 1929. Stability in competition. Economic Journal 39: 41–57.
Ishikawa, T. 2007. An analysis of the relationship between manufacturer’s profit and spatial economic structure in the retail market. In Time and space in economy, ed. T. Asada and T. Ishikawa, 283–296. Tokyo: Springer.
Ishikawa, T. 2013. Effects of spatial retail structure on the manufacturing firm’s location. In Mobility in space and time (= Würzburger Geographische Manuskripte, vol. 80), ed. K. Schliephake et al., 1–12. Würzburg.
Janelle, D. 1991. Global interaction and its consequences. In Collapsing space and time, ed. S. Brunn and T. Leinbach, 49–81. London.
Kasperova, Valentina. 2009. Christallers central place theory. University of Wageningen. https://www.slideshare.net/ecumene/christallers-central-place-theory?next_slideshow=3.
Kramberger, T., et al. (eds.). 2016. Sustainable logistics and strategic transportation planning (= Advances in logistics, operations and management science). Hershey PA: IGI Global Eds.
Krugman, Paul. 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99 (3): 483–499.
Lloyd, P., and P. Dicken. 1990. Location in space. A theoretical approach to economic geography. London, New York.
Lösch, A. 1954. The economics of location. New Haven.
Lösch, A. 1962. Die räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft. Stuttgart (first published in 1940).
Minerva, G.A., and G.I.P. Ottaviano. 2009. Endogenous growth theories: Agglomeration benefits and transportation costs. In Handbook of regional growth and development theories, 86–97 Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1957. Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. London.
O’Farrell, P.N., and J. Markham. 1975. Commuting costs and residential location. Tijdschrift voor Econ. en Sociale Geographie 66: 66–74.
Rodrigue, Jean Paul, et al. 2017. The geography of transport systems. New York: Routledge.
Sabic—Saudi Basic Industries Corporation. Annual Report, Riyadh.
Schliephake, K. 2001. Passenger transport in Germany—Transport systems in competition. PROMET Traffic – Traffico 13(2–3): 187–198 (Zagreb, Portoroz & Trieste).
Schliephake, K., and T. Schenk. 2005. Verkehr und Mobilität. In Allgemeine Anthropogeographie (= Perthes Geographie Kolleg), ed. W. Schenk and K. Schliephake, 531–571. Gotha & Stuttgart.
Ullman, E.L. 1956. The role of transportation and basis for interaction. In Man’s role in changing the face of the earth, ed. W.L. Summers, 862–880. Chicago.
Von Thünen, J.H. 1966. The isolated state. Cambridge MA (Original version was published in 1826).
Weber, A. 1909a. Ueber den Standort der Industrien. Tuebingen.
Weber, A. 1909b. Theory of the location of industry. Chicago.
White Paper on Transport. 2011. Road map to a single European transport area. Luxembourg: European Union.
Wöhe, G., et al. 2016. Einführung in die Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Muenchen.
Wood, Andrew, and S. Roberts. 2011. Economic geography—Places, networks and flows. New York: Routledge.
World Energy Outlook (annually), Paris (IEA/OECD).
World Development Report. 1995, 2009, 2016. Washington DC.
World Trade Statistical Review. 2017. (annual). Washington DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schliephake, K. (2018). Transport Costs in Space—Geographical Models and Contradictions. In: Ishikawa, T. (eds) Locational Analysis of Firms’ Activities from a Strategic Perspective. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1684-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1684-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1683-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1684-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)