Skip to main content

Performance Comparison of SMO-Based Fuzzy PID Controller for Load Frequency Control

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 817))

Abstract

This paper presents dynamic performance comparison of a fuzzy logic-based proportional, integral, and derivative controller (FPID) with different membership functions such as triangular, trapezoidal, and Gaussian for load frequency control (LFC) in an interconnected two-area thermal power system. The parameters of controller are optimized by using spider monkey optimization (SMO) algorithm. The superiority of the proposed algorithm is established by comparing the results with popularly used algorithms like particle swarm optimization (PSO) and teaching–learning-based optimization (TLBO). Initially, the linearized model of the system is considered with reheat turbine; then, the study is extended by imposing nonlinearity such as generation rate constraints (GRC) and governor dead band (GDB). The result comparison is analyzed using various time domain specifications like peak undershoot, peak overshoot, and settling time of different area frequencies and tie-line power deviation between them applying a step load perturbation (SLP) of 1%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Elgerd, O.I.: Electric Energy Systems Theory: An Introduction, 2nd edn. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kundur, P.: Power System Stability and Control. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi (2009) (8th reprint)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohn, N.: Some aspects of tie-line bias control on interconnected power systems. Trans. Am. Inst. Electr. Eng. Part III Power Appar. Syst. 75(3), 1415–1436 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elgerd, O.I., Fosha, C.E.: Optimum megawatt-frequency control of multiarea electric energy systems. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 4, 556–563 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghoshal, S.P.: Optimizations of PID gains by particle swarm optimizations in fuzzy based automatic generation control. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 72(3), 203–212 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kocaarslan, I., Ertuğrul, Ç.: Fuzzy logic controller in interconnected electrical power systems for load-frequency control. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 27(8), 542–549 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Panda, G., Panda, S., Cemal, A.: Automatic generation control of interconnected power system with generation rate constraints by hybrid neuro fuzzy approach. Int. J. Electr. Electron. Eng. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saikia, L.C., Nanda, J., Mishra, S.: Performance comparison of several classical controllers in AGC for multi-area interconnected thermal system. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 33(3), 394–401 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sahu, R.K., Panda, S., Pradhan, S.: A hybrid firefly algorithm and pattern search technique for automatic generation control of multi area power systems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 64, 9–23 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sahu, R.K., Panda, S., Sekhar, G.T.C.: A novel hybrid PSO-PS optimized fuzzy PI controller for AGC in multi area interconnected power systems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 64, 880–893 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sahu, B.K., et al.: Teaching–learning based optimization algorithm based fuzzy-PID controller for automatic generation control of multi-area power system. Appl. Soft Comput. 27, 240–249 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sahu, B.K., Pati, S., Panda, S.: Hybrid differential evolution particle swarm optimization optimized fuzzy proportional–integral derivative controller for automatic generation control of interconnected power system. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 8(11), 1789–1800 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sahu, R.K., Panda, S., Padhan, S.: A novel hybrid gravitational search and pattern search algorithm for load frequency control of nonlinear power system. Appl. Soft Comput. 29, 310–327 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sahu, R.K., Panda, S., Pradhan, P.C.: Design and analysis of hybrid firefly algorithm-pattern search based fuzzy PID controller for LFC of multi area power systems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 69, 200–212 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sahu, B.K., et al.: A novel hybrid LUS–TLBO optimized fuzzy-PID controller for load frequency control of multi-source power system. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 74, 58–69 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bansal, J.C., et al.: Spider monkey optimization algorithm for numerical optimization. Memetic Comput. 6(1), 31–47 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta, K., Deep, K., Bansal, J.C.: Spider monkey optimization algorithm for constrained optimization problems. Soft. Comput. 21(23), 6933–6962 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debasis Tripathy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix [8, 12]

f = 60 Hz; R1 = R2 = 2.4 Hz/pu.; TG1 = TG2 = 0.08 s; TT1 = TT2 = 0.3 s; B1 = B2 = 0.425 p.u. MW/Hz; Tr1 = Tr2 = 10 s; Kr1 = Kr2 = 0.5 TP1 = TP2 = 20 s; KP1 =  KP2 = 120 Hz/p.u. MW T12 = 0.545, a12 = −1.

Appendix

Population size (n) = 50, number of iteration = 100, and number of runs = 20.

Control parameters for SMO: LLlim = (n/2) = 25, GLlim = ((n * d)/2) = 250. MG. = 10, pr = 0.1–0.9 increasing linearly.

Control parameters for PSO: Inertia weight (w), decreases linearly from 0.9–0.1; acceleration coefficients (c1 = 2, c2 = 2).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tripathy, D., Barik, A.K., Choudhury, N.B.D., Sahu, B.K. (2019). Performance Comparison of SMO-Based Fuzzy PID Controller for Load Frequency Control. In: Bansal, J., Das, K., Nagar, A., Deep, K., Ojha, A. (eds) Soft Computing for Problem Solving. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 817. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1595-4_70

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics